Site update and dates for your calendar

Posted by on September 15th, 2011

Scheduled Node Maintenance:

This weekend (September 16-18) we’re upgrading the system that the Node runs on (WordPress), so you may not be able to access the site at times. Everything should be working again on Monday, but as always, if you spot anything unusual, let us know.

Update 18/9: the site upgrade is now complete, and everything works - as far as we can tell (again, do let us know if something seems weird.)

Dates for your calendar
In the recent survey about the Node, a few people asked to be kept up to date of various scholarships and registration deadlines. Here is a selection of upcoming dates of interest, but this is by no means an exhaustive list. We’ll try to do these once in a while, but don’t hesitate to write your own posts to let people know about similar deadlines, or leave a comment below. Also make sure to check the eligibility of all scholarships and grants before applying.

Conference registration deadlines.
Keystone announced a few upcoming deadlines for conference abstract submissions, including dates for the following meetings:
September 19 – abstract & scholarship deadline for “Angiogenesis: Advances in Basic Science and Therapeutic Applications” (January 16-21, 2012)
September 20 – abstract & scholarship deadline for “Epigenomics” joint with “Chromatin Dynamics” (January 17-22, 2012)
September 21 – abstract & scholarship deadline for “Cardiovascular Development and Regeneration” (January 22-27, 2012)
October 6 - abstract & scholarship deadline for “Gene silencing by small RNAs” (February 7-12, 2012)

Grants and fellowships:
October 11 - The NSF announced an application deadline of October 11 for Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology (PRFB). For 2012 this fellowship is limited to certain areas: (1) Broadening Participation in Biology; (2) Intersections of Biology and Mathematical and Physical Sciences; and (3) National Plant Genome Initiative Postdoctoral Research Fellowships.
November 1 – Sir Henry Wellcome PostDoctoral Fellowships. See their website for other grant deadlines.
November 18 – NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP)

Travel funding:
September 30 – Deadline for The Company of Biologists Direct Travel grants, which fund travel for conference attendance.
October 31 - EDEN has research exchange funds available for US-based eco-evo-devo researchers (graduate students, postdocs, faculty).
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Tags
Category Funding, News, Resources | No Comments »

Development of electroreceptors: a “sixth sense”

Posted by on May 23rd, 2011

Hi there! My name is Melinda, and I’m a postdoctoral researcher at Cambridge University in the UK in the lab of Dr. Clare Baker (http://www.pdn.cam.ac.uk/staff/baker/). I’ve just wrapped up my research trip to work on paddlefish embryos in the southeastern state of Georgia in the United States, generously funding by the Development Travelling Fellowship award!

We are used to experiencing the world with five senses: sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing. Many of these sensory systems are generated by placodes, which are regions of thickened ectoderm found in the embryonic head that generate a variety of peripheral sense organs, such as the otic and olfactory placodes, which form the inner ear and nasal epithelium, important for hearing and smelling, respectively. Hearing and balance are mediated by the mechanical displacement of tiny ¨hairs¨ on specialized sensory ¨hair cells¨ in our inner ears (also simply called mechanoreceptors).  In fish and aquatic amphibians, a series of lateral line placodes generates the lateral line system, which also contains modified mechanoreceptor hair cells, much like those found in the inner ear. These are used to detect changes in the local water environment important for prey or predator detection and schooling behaviors. In addition to the mechanoreceptors, another type of modified hair cell can be found in all major aquatic vertebrate groups: these are the electroreceptors, distributed in fields of “ampullary organs” on either side of the lateral lines of mechanosensory hair cells.

As the name suggests, electroreceptors allow animals that possess them to detect weak electric fields in water. Similar to mechanoreceptors, this is also used to find prey and for orientation. However land vertebrates (including reptiles, birds and mammals), as well as frogs and most modern bony fish (such as teleosts), have lost this ancient ¨sixth sense¨. They are still found in many aquatic vertebrates including jawless fish (lampreys), cartilaginous fish (sharks, rays), primitive bony fish (e.g. sturgeon, paddlefish), and even some amphibians (salamanders). Interestingly, in a few groups of modern bony fish, such as catfish and “electric fish”, electroreceptors have been independently “re-invented”. Although an evolutionarily ancient sense, electroreceptors were only discovered in the 1950s, and very little is known about their development or formation, i.e., how they develop in the embryo, what genes control their development, and what makes the difference between the sensory hair cells that detect changes in electric fields and those that detect water movement.

That’s where the North American paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) can help! This is truly an incredible animal. It has the most electroreceptors of any living vertebrate: between 50,000 and 70,000 “ampullary organs” per adult, many of them located on their rostrum or “paddle”, which is an extension of their cranium that accounts for nearly a third of their total body length (typically 1-2 meters).  Although a vulnerable or “threatened” species, conservation and farming efforts have made this primitive fish commercially viable as a source of caviar (No, I’ve never tried it…maybe it’s just me, but I’m not crazy about the idea of eating what I study), thus allowing us to obtain embryos for studying hair cell, and more specifically, electroreceptor development.

Now, contrary to what people initially think about my “field” trips, I don’t even see the adult fish! I go to the lab of collaborator Marcus Davis at Kennesaw State University, which is located on the outskirts of Atlanta, Georgia. The actual process of fertilizing the embryos is done in Missouri at Osage Catfishieries (osagecatfisheries.com) by the Kahrs family, a terrific family owned business that we’ve worked with over the years. Fertilization is external, so mature adults are injected with hormones that, along with weather conditions, dictate whether they are ready to be squeezed  (or in the case of males “milked” for sperm). So like buying from Amazon, I get an approximate delivery date and anxiously wait until I get an email saying the box of embryos is on the way. Once there, our game faces come on and, it’s at least 14 days of working all kinds of hours to ensure we maximize the one or two clutches we get per year. That means all experimental manipulations (e.g. injections, electroporations, drug treatments) need to be done in a short amount of time, in addition to the husbandry and collection of fixed specimens for future work. To say it´s intense at times is an understatement.

For me, one of the biggest challenges working at this university is that they are still in “transition” from their previous role as a small two-year college to a large four-year undergraduate college trying to advance scientific research. To give you an idea of what this means, there are no graduate students or postdocs, and I am the first postdoctoral researcher to ever visit this department. While I do get to interact with other faculty and undergraduate students, for the most part, I work alone. While I appreciate the chance to get caught up on all the podcasts I let pile up, it’s a very different environment to what I’m familiar with. Also as a former “commuter” school, it is located just off the major interstate, convenient for drivers, but not close to town. So any excursions require driving, thus making it more difficult to explore the area when you are limited for time.

However, two of my favorite things about going to Georgia (besides working on paddlefish, of course) are southern food and spring thunderstorms. Coming from England, I know drizzling rain. But in Georgia, with little warning, thunder and lightening just roll in. It can be quite a show and then 15 minutes later it’s completely gone and if it’s still daylight, the sun comes back out. Usually, it’s no big deal and quite normal around here. This year was different though. Across much of the southern United States, many states experienced the worst storms and tornados in nearly four decades! Luckily, the area I was visiting was spared much of the destruction: we only had a couple of power outages, but it did make for a few sleepless nights. All in all, not a bad season.

To see a juvenile paddlefish eating, check out this video I took:

GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Tags , ,
Category Funding, Research | 2 Comments »

Science – The Bigger Picture

Posted by on May 1st, 2011

This is a retelling of the student and post-doc workshop from the second day of the BSDB/BSCB joint spring meeting that took place in Canterbury at the University of Kent. The session emphasised the need for accurate science and scientific involvement in public communication. It ended up a bit longer than I’d intended, but this is something I’m really enthusiastic about and felt it needed to be shared in detail. I hope you find it helpful.




Panellists:

Dr Peter Wilmshurst – A consultant cardiologist, known for his refusal to falsify or withhold data in pharmaceutical studies. He was being sued for libel and slander by NMT medical until the company entered liquidation in April.

Rose Wu – A representative for the charity Sense about Science which works tirelessly despite limited funding to improve the public image of science, aids accurate reporting of scientific issues in the media and campaigns for further government support for research.

Dr Jenny Rohn – A UCL post-doc by day. Also known for her punditry, she runs the popular science communication website lablit.com has been interviewed numerous times for tv and radio. She has published numerous stories and editorials and two fictional novels Experimental Heart and The Honest Look, communicating science through the engaging and emotional personal lives of scientists. She was also central to the campaign to save UK science funding.

Read the rest of this entry »
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Category Discussion, Education, Funding, News, Research | No Comments »

Travel fellowships deadline approaching

Posted by on April 21st, 2011

The next deadline for Development’s travelling fellowships is coming up on April 30, and Development would like to encourage you to apply if you are a graduate student or postdoc planning to work for a few months in a distant lab. Have a look at the fellowship site for the full requirements, and read these stories from previous recipients on the Node:

Tetyana (from the Ukraine) went to India:
Research Snippets from the Land of the Tiger
The Maggot Meeting 2010

Cristian (from Chile) went to Germany:
Developing Science in a Far Country: The Paradoxes of Life

Shreeharsha (from India) went to Japan:
Research in the Land of the Rising Sun

Dávid (from Hungary) went to Japan:
Nippon

Terry (from the US) went to Israel:
International Experience

Giovanni (from Italy) is currently in the Netherlands:
A nice Lab Experience in Amsterdam


If you’re planning a lab exchange as part of your research, don’t forget to apply for travel funding before April 30. Good luck!



GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Category Funding | No Comments »

Wellcome to the Node

Posted by on April 19th, 2011



Hello ‘the Node’, it’s very nice to be here. :) This is the first of my cross-posts between the Wellcome Trust and The Node talking about myself and the research I’m doing in my PhD. You can find my first posts for the Wellcome Trust here and here. I try to write in a way that is accessible to all, so I hope you enjoy them.

Hopefully, science permitting, you’ll be seeing a lot more of me around here and I’m looking forward to meeting many of you at the upcoming BSDB-BSCB spring meeting.

Me, myself and my PhD

Hi, I’m Jonathan Lawson and I’m here to share my experiences as a developmental biology PhD student in Cambridge. I’m 23 and have already spent four years in Cambridge as an undergraduate, which gave me a BA/MSci in Biochemistry. Although I spend a lot of time in the lab, outside of work I spend a lot of time dancing and my other major passion is baking. I am currently web editor for the student run Cambridge science magazine BlueSci. I am writing these blogs as part of a collaboration between The Node and my benefactors, the Wellcome Trust.

My course is one of the Trust’s Four-year PhD Programmes, it is unusual in that, in the first year, we have a choice of labs we can join, spread across different departments at the University. Each student chooses three labs to join, each for a short nine-week project. This is too short a time to make any significant contributions, but it does allow you to get a good idea of what work is going on in the lab, and whether you will fit in well with the social dynamic. At the end of the first year we choose to join one of these labs for our full 3-year PhD project. This allows students to better understand a lab, and the work, before joining for the long-term, the idea being that students generally feel happier and are more likely to complete their PhD.

Read the rest of this entry »
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Category Careers, Education, Funding, Lab Life, Research | 1 Comment »

Australia Rallies Against Cutbacks To Medical Research Funding

Posted by on April 12th, 2011

Last week, news that the Australian government was planning to slash the budget for medical research by more than half over the next three years leaked out and rocked the scientific community. Only one out of seven grants submitted to the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia’s major funding body for medical research, is approved with at least another three deemed good enough for funding but ultimately rejected anyway due to lack of funds. With the potential upcoming cuts to medical funding, the NHMRC will only be able to fund one out of ten grants it reviews.

Rally in Melbourne

The gravity of this news cannot be understated. It is a sad disaster. Medical research is of prime importance especially when we take into account terrible disorders such as cancer, HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and infectious diseases which our generation has to face. Cutting funding means saying no to progress against fighting those diseases and the many others. It means leaving people who can be saved to die. Yes, it is a murderous decision.

Developmental biology will not be spared from those cuts. Important and possibly life-changing research related to stem cells, for instance, will be halted, discontinued or rejected, plain and simple. Who will be affected? Well, it could be me, you, your family or friends… it could be anyone.

If the government (elected by the people, for the people) does not realize that it is going to spill its own people’s blood by cutting medical research funding, then it is up to the people to send them a message. And so it did. Rallies were organized today in several major Australian cities including Melbourne, Sydney, Canberra and Adelaide with more to follow in Perth, Darwin and Hobart later this week. A Twitter rally—that successfully trended #protectresearch, the Twitter hashtag adopted by the movement—was also carried out online.

I was at the Melbourne rally where an estimated 4000 demonstrators assembled in front of the State Library. Banners were everywhere, raised high up by outstretched arms, or rulers, meter rules or pipettes. Yes, scientists are an innovative bunch. “Medical research keeps my blood pumping,” “SOS: Save Our Science,” “Cut the nonsense, not the funding!” or “Gillard [the Australian prime minister], we’ll cure your dementia (no seriously… we will)!” were flung around.

Amidst the chorus of “Cures not cuts” and “research saves lives,” were a number of guest speakers. One of them was Nerissa Mapes, a 34-year-old woman who has been living with Parkinson’s disease for the past six years. She addressed the crowd with what was a poignant and deeply powerful speech. Her speech stressed on the important role scientists play in society. It was a wonderful way to remind us all that medical research is for the people. She concluded with this:

“There is no cure for Parkinson’s disease. But there is hope. And hope gives us courage. Don’t let them take this hope away from us.”

Medical research saves life. Cutting its funding is like handling death sentences at will.

For more information visit the Discoveries Need Dollars’ website, twitter or facebook page.

Image credit: strangehours (from flickr).
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Tags
Category Funding | No Comments »

Travel funding

Posted by on March 17th, 2011

If you’re attending a conference later this year and need help funding your travel, you can apply for one of the Company of Biologists’ Direct Travel grants. The maximum amount of these grants has just been increased to £600 for international travel and £300 for travel in the same country as resident. (The website still lists the old amounts.)

-Deadline for the next round is March 31st.
-Applicants must be a PhD student or junior (in first three years post PhD and in first postdoctoral position) postdoctoral researcher.
-Applications will not be considered from those eligible to apply for travel grants from the British Society for Developmental Biology (BSDB) or any other Company of Biologists grant-aided source.

In addition, Development also offers fellowship awards of up to £2500 for PhD students and postdocs to travel to another lab for a collaborative exchange. You can find out more about those Travelling Fellowships on the Development website, and the application deadline for the next round of these awards is April 30.
We’ve featured some reports from previous recipients of the Travelling Fellowships on the Node, so you can read their experiences.

Both the Direct Travel Grants and the Travelling Fellowships are open to applicants from any country.

(image by Duncan Harris on Flickr.)
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Category Funding | No Comments »

Stem Cells versus Progenitors

Posted by on February 13th, 2011

With so much research focusing on stem cells, I’ve been wondering lately whether researchers are overlooking other important, multipotent cell groups, specifically what are called “progenitor” cells. But then another part of me wonders whether these two groups are so very different from each other. Technically, the main difference between stem cells and progenitors is their lifespan, with progenitors’ being much shorter, but the line here seems blurry; most adult stem cells cannot be cultured for extensive amounts of time before they differentiate or senesce.

I was reminded of the issue of stem cells versus progenitors by a paper that came out earlier this month in The Journal of Clinical Investigation that showed, surprisingly, that patients with androgenic alopecia (AGA), or male pattern baldness, had a normal number of hair stem cells in their scalps, but a depleted number of different hair progenitor cells. The progenitors now look like a likely culprit for AGA. It’s been well-studied how stem cells in hair follicles give rise to new hairs over time, and it’s known that progenitors derived from these stem cells play key roles in this process, but it had not been studied with relation to AGA previously. It’s possible that the stem cells in bald AGA scalps are somehow dysfunctional or inactivated, and this could cause the loss of progenitor cells, but it still needs to be looked into (If you’d like to read more detailed coverage of this paper, I wrote a technical blog post about it on my blog All Things Stem Cell and a layman article on it for my column Biology Bytes.)

I wonder what would have happened to this recent study if when the researchers had found out that the number of hair stem cells was the same in haired and bald scalps, they then moved on to investigating other, maybe non-cellular suspects, without looking at the progenitors. Perhaps they would have then discovered a molecular abnormality in the stem cells, and then suspected the downstream progenitor groups. I just can’t help but wonder how many other diseases and biological phenomena have been investigated with a primary focus on the stem cells involved, when in some cases the progenitors may be a better initial indicator for what’s changed in the system. Or maybe using the terms “stem cells” and “progenitors” is really splitting hairs; stem cells vary significantly in potency and proliferation capacity from group to group, so maybe we should just expand the already expansive term “stem cells” to encompass a broader range of cells. While I like to think that a cell type’s name doesn’t affect whether a researcher studies it, I’d imagine it’s easier to get funding for “stem cell” research than “progenitor cell” research (or, with some funding agencies it may be the other way around), and this may definitely affect a researcher’s focus with funding as tight as it is.
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Tags , , ,
Category Discussion, Funding, Research | 3 Comments »

News roundup

Posted by on January 31st, 2011

Just a quick roundup of some interesting bits of news.

Embryo research in France
This one’s rather interesting to read together with the interview with Margaret Buckingham we posted last week. France has very strict regulations in place for research on embryos or ESCs. Now, Nature reports that researchers in France are urging their government to authorize ESC/embryo research.
(This will be an interesting story to follow. If you’re in France, are you affected by this regulation? If so, would you like to write about it on the Node? Get in touch if you’d like to keep your colleagues around the world in the loop.)

EMBO installation grants
In December, EMBO announced that they’ve awarded Installation Grants to six researchers, allowing them to set up research groups in the Czech Republic, Poland, Portugal and Turkey. Many of the recipients are working, or have worked, in areas related to developmental biology: Szymon Świeżewski and Tomasz Wilanowski set up labs in Poland to study ncRNA-based gene regulation and Grainyhead-like transcription factors respectively. Alena Krejčí is starting a group in the Czech Republic to study Notch signalling in cellular metabolism, after a postdoc with Sarah Bray in Cambridge, and Cory Dunn moved to Turkey to work on mitochondrial DNA damage after a postdoc with Iva Greenwald at Columbia.

Research Blogging
We found a nice blog post about a Development paper on the Sanford-Burnham blog, with interviews with the authors. It’s also listed on Research Blogging - a site that indexes blog posts about peer reviewed research.
If you search for “developmental biology” on Research Blogging, you’ll find a few familiar posts, as we use this on the Node as well. We love to hear your stories behind papers (in any journal), and if you don’t have your own (or institutional) blog, you’re more than welcome to use the Node to show off your work.

Heard any other news that the Node should cover? Please sign up and post it yourself, to prevent delays
GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Tags , , , , , , ,
Category Funding, News, Research | No Comments »

Skip your postdoc?

Posted by on January 20th, 2011

A friend of mine went straight from his PhD in computational (pharmaco)chemistry to an investigator position, and I have heard an unconfirmed second-hand story of one other person recently making this transition in a life science related area. But by and large, most PI jobs require that you have done at least one postdoc, and the suggestion of people skipping this stage entirely seems like an urban myth. Historically, however, a PhD degree is itself enough for an academic position, and in several fields (most notably the humanities) this is still the case.

By requesting applicants to do one or more postdocs, the need for them is propagated further, but the NIH is now trying to break the mold by introducing a grant specifically meant to skip your postdoc. They describe it as follows:

“Although traditional post-doctoral training is likely most appropriate for the majority of new Ph.D.s and M.D.s, there is a pool of talented young scientists who have the intellect, scientific creativity, drive and maturity to flourish independently without the need for traditional post-doctoral training. Reducing the amount of time they spend in training would provide them the opportunity to start highly innovative research programs as early in their careers as possible. “

Of course, this still requires them to find an institute that will hire them without the ubiquitously desired “postdoctoral research experience”, but arriving at the door with an NIH grant under your belt should help.

The deadline for this new grant is this Friday. Are any of you applying? What do you think of this idea? Let us know via the poll below.

(poll closed and archived)


GD Star Rating
loading…
Share

Tags ,
Category Careers, Discussion, Funding | 3 Comments »


Copyright 2010 - 2012 The Company of Biologists Ltd

Company of Biologists