The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

BSDB Gurdon Summer Studentship Report (12)

Posted by , on 24 October 2017

BSDBlogoEstablished  by the British Society for Developmental Biology in 2014, The Gurdon/The Company of Biologists Summer Studentship scheme provides financial support to allow highly motivated undergraduate students an opportunity to engage in practical research during their summer vacation. Each year, ten successful applicants spend eight weeks in the research laboratories of their choices, and the feedback we receive is outstanding. 

Our first report from the 2017 group of student awardees comes from Josie Elliott (student at University of Oxford), who undertook her studentship with Alison Woollard at the Dept. of Biochemistry in Oxford.

What is the role of wrt-2 and wrt-4 in left-right asymmetry in C.elegans?

Once upon a time a genetic screen identified a signalling pathway that caused Drosophila melanogaster embryos to develop a ‘lawn’ of denticles rather than forming them only at parasegment boundaries. Thus the so-called Hedgehog signaling pathway was born (Nusslein-Volhard & Wieschaus, 1980). This pathway has revealed itself to be one of the core signal transduction pathways in regulating animal development. Through gene duplication and diversification events, different types of hedgehog proteins have been found across vertebrates. The brilliantly named Sonic Hedgehog ligand is the best studied ligand present in mammals. Loss of expression of Sonic Hedgehog in mice causes defects in left right asymmetry (Levin et al., 1995).

The story was expanded into C.elegans by bioinformatics (Burglin, 1996). A search of the C.elegans genome for homologues of the carboxyl terminal ‘hog’ domain revealed a family of proteins which did not contain the amino terminal ‘Hedge’ domain but instead a novel domain dubbed ‘Wart’. Thus the warthog (wrt) genes were named. Further genome analysis revealed genes which contained the amino wart domain but lacked the carboxy hog domain. Together this made a family of ten warthog genes.

Previous research in my lab (the Woollard lab in the Biochemistry department at the University of Oxford) had linked the wrt-2 branch of the warthog family (figure 2) to defects in left right asymmetry, with wrt-2 and wrt-4 giving the highest penetrance phenotypes. However it was found that the GFP marker used in the previous strains to help quantify another phenotype (related to vulval development) caused defects of its own. This is where I come in. My project was to cross and create strains of worms without this GFP background and then requantify the left right asymmetry defects. I studied the single mutants wrt-2, wrt-4, wrt-8, as well as the double mutants wrt-4;wrt-2, wrt-8;wrt-2, wrt-8;wrt-4 and the triple mutant wrt-8;wrt-4;wrt-2. The double and triple mutant strains I created myself. The combined mutations allow investigation into redundancy between the genes, giving a glimpse into their evolutionary history. The wrt-7 gene has been shown to have no expression pattern and is likely a pseudogene, so due to my limited time in the lab I didn’t quantify the wrt-7 mutations.

Fig. 2 The tree presents the origin of the ‘Wart’ domain in C. elegans’ most distant relative in the Rhabditiada order, Brugia malayi, as well as its two closet relatives in the Caenorhabditis genus, C. briggsae and C. remanei. A multiple sequence alignment of Wart domains was used to generate this unrooted Neighbour Joining tree (default setting Clustal_X). Results of 1000 bootstrap trials are shown. Figure from Emily Baker’s dissertation.

On a side note: the C.elegans species is great. They’re heamaphrodites so you can just leave them on an agar plate to reproduce by themselves. Males do exist – enabling you to perform genetic crosses. They’re transparent, so no need to dissect anything. You can even freeze them and they’ll be alright in liquid nitrogen until someone needs them!

At first glance C.elegans may not seem very asymmetric. However one source of left right asymmetry is the relative positioning of the gonads and intestine either side of the vulva in the worm. This is best shown through pictures. In the wildtype worm (figure 3d) the picture in the lefthand plane shows that in the anterior part of the worm one can see intestinal cells and the intestinal lumen going down the centre. In the posterior part of the worm one can see the U shaped gonad that migrates away from the vulva (just visible in the bottom left hand corner of that picture) along the body, turns twice then travels back along the body (schematic figure 3c). The top picture of a whole worm (figure 3d) shows the opposite situation (the worm is laying on its other side) where the gonad can be seen at the anterior part of the body and the intestine at the posterior.

Fig. 3 a) L1 stage animal. b) L4 stage animal. The gonad turns twice due to the migration of the distal tip cell (DTC). c) Commencement sees the gonad arms depart from the ventral midpoint and travel along the ventral sides of the worm (red arrow); firstly turning to the dorsal side of the animal and secondly along the anteroposterior axis (yellow arrow) until they meet again, this time at the dorsal midpoint (blue arrow). The gonad migration at the anterior end of the worm is the mirror-image. Furthermore, the anterior gonad is located on the right-hand lateral side of the worm (shown as the bottom plane), whereas the posterior gonad lies along the left-hand lateral side (top plane); however, this is not shown in the image. d) Arrowhead points to vulva. The right-hand lateral side is shown and therefore the anterior, but not the posterior, gonad arm is visible. The alternate scenario in which the posterior gonad is visible in the top plane of view is hypothetically depicted; in which instance, the anterior gonad would be hidden from view by the intestine. Scale bar = 25μm. Figure taken from Emily Baker’s dissertation.

Thus the anterior/posterior distribution of gonad and intestine gives us a tool to study and quantify left right asymmetry in worms. After discussions with Emily (a recent biology graduate who had been working on the project before me) we decided to only quantify worms in which the posterior gonad was visible down the microscope. Thus, worms which I counted looked like those in the two lefthand plane pictures in figure 3d. This decision, although arbitrary in itself, allows our results when published to be more understandable and easier to replicate.

The pictures shown in figure 4 demonstrate some of the mutant phenotypes scored in this project. Basically I was looking for gonad tissue poking through anterior intestine tissue and intestine tissue poking through posterior gonad tissue. Worms with this phenotype were scored as mutant and were also further divided into anterior or posterior defects.

Fig. 4 Top left shows the anterior gonad of a wrt-2;wrt-4 worm in which gonad tissue can be seen as well as intestine. Bottom left shows the anterior gonad of a wrt-8 worm in which gonad can be seen above and below the intestine cells. Top right shows the posterior gonad of a wrt-2;wrt-4 worm in which the gonad has migrated unsuually thus intestine tissue can be seen. Bottom right shows the posterior gonad of a wrt-2;wrt-4 worm in which half the gonad has disappeared to the other side of the worm. Photos taken by me on a Zeiss microscope.

One of the most enjoyable parts of this project has been pipetting alongside Emily, who worked on this project before me and is continuing to develop it. In my 8 weeks I have seen first hand a small portion of the amount of research that has gone into studying the warthog genes. However chatting with Emily I have seen how my short project may in future count towards producing a scientific paper. At the moment Emily is taking the story of warthog genes in C.elegans back to its bioinformatics heart, producing a phylogenetic tree of all the warthog genes across the nematode family – trying to link evolution with phenotype. She is also expanding from the wrt-2 branch of the gene family into as many other members as she can get her hands on.

The highlight of my time in the project has been having so much independence in the lab, deciding day to day, week to week how I wanted to spend my time. This has been a fantastic insight into the life of a researcher and totally different to undergraduate labs. The lowlight would have to be the Saturday when I broke a pipette and in the process spilled a box of pipette tips all over my desk…

Thank you so much to everyone in the Woollard lab for being more friendly and welcoming than I could have hoped for.

Josie Elliott

Thumbs up (6 votes)

Tags: , ,
Categories: Societies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get involved

Create an account or log in to post your story on the Node.

Sign up for emails

Subscribe to our mailing lists.

Most-read posts in May

Do you have any news to share?

Our ‘Developing news’ posts celebrate the various achievements of the people in the developmental and stem cell biology community. Let us know if you would like to share some news.