Review: Electric shock
Posted by Eva Amsen, on 7 February 2013
Last year, Matter launched, after a successful Kickstarter campaign, as a magazine that publishes only long, well-written articles related to “science, technology and the ideas shaping our future”. Each issue is one article, which costs $0.99 to access. (On my iPad, they ‘re categorized as books, and are each about 40 pages long, which I think justifies both the price and the fact that I’m filing this under “book review”.)
The latest issue is of Matter is about online scammers, but the one before that was about developmental biology! Or rather, “Electric Shock”, written by Cynthia Graber, is about a biologist. It profiles the life of Michael Levin and his work in understanding the role of bioelectricity in organ regeneration.
Matter’s audience is broad, and most of them are not biologists, so when Graber describes Levin’s work, she also has to explain the basics of developmental biology: “One cell divides into two, two into four, four into eight, continuing until there are dozens, thousands, millions of them. In the process, some cells transform into blood, others into bone; some into tissue, others into tendon.”
The specific work described in the article is a study published in Communicative and Integrative Biology last month, as an addendum to an earlier paper from the Levin lab in The Journal of Neuroscience. Their earlier work had shown that tadpole tails can regenerate in response to regulated ion transport, and that bioelectric signals can induce ectopic eyes in tadpoles, but now they also achieved regeneration in (older) developing frogs’ legs!
In “Electric Shock”, Graber describes not just the work itself, but the context. Why did Levin become interested in bioelectricity? What was he like as a child? How does he spend his time outside of the lab? We learn that Levin takes his parents to Florida each year, for a few weeks in March. He brings along a lot of reading material on those trips, to think about his work from new angles, and discusses it with his family. “…at night, he explains his thoughts to his father over dinner. “If I can’t explain my ideas to a very smart non-expert then I haven’t really fleshed them out properly anyway,” he says.””
I love reading profiles of researchers that go beyond what’s in the scientific literature. In this case, I was especially amused because the very week that this issue of Matter came out, we also published one of Levin’s papers in Development, so he was suddenly everywhere! His most recent Development paper was about planarian regeneration, which wasn’t covered in the Matter piece, but we also published the frog ectopic eye work last year, and it was great to get a glimpse into the lab where the work was done.
Read the original article:
Electric Shock – by Cynthia Graber
Papers mentioned in this review:
Tseng A. & Levin M. (2013). Cracking the bioelectric code: Probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation, Communicative & Integrative Biology, 6 (1) e22595. DOI: 10.4161/cib.22595
Tseng A.S., Beane W.S., Lemire J.M., Masi A. & Levin M. (2010). Induction of Vertebrate Regeneration by a Transient Sodium Current, Journal of Neuroscience, 30 (39) 13192-13200. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3315-10.2010
Beane W.S., Morokuma J., Lemire J.M. & Levin M. (2013). Bioelectric signaling regulates head and organ size during planarian regeneration, Development, 140 (2) 313-322. DOI: 10.1242/dev.086900
Pai V.P., Aw S., Shomrat T., Lemire J.M. & Levin M. (2012). Transmembrane voltage potential controls embryonic eye patterning in Xenopus laevis, Development, 139 (2) 313-323. DOI: 10.1242/dev.073759
(Disclaimer: I contributed to the Matter Kickstarter campaign and as a result I am on their massive editorial board and get to be part of crowdsourced topic suggestions for the magazine. However, I was not involved in commissioning this piece, and was as pleasantly surprised as anyone to suddenly find a profile of a developmental biologist in a broader media publication!)

The annual 
Idoia Quintana studies shark brain development in Spain, and travelled to Scotland recently to learn how to work with mouse brains, so she could do some 
Stephanie Vanderweide travelled from California to Montreal in the middle of the Canadian winter to learn how to

Identifying methods by which pancreatic β-cells can be produced is of major therapeutic importance. Whether there are adult pancreatic cells with the potential to make new β-cells is a matter of much debate. During embryonic development, the transcription factor Ptf1a initially marks multipotent progenitors, before becoming restricted to acinar cells. Here (
During epithelial wound healing, actin assembles at the leading edge of cells that border the wound, forming dynamic protrusions and, in some cases, an actomyosin cable. Together, these actin-rich structures are essential for wound closure. The process of dorsal closure in Drosophila shares many characteristics with wound healing and is a convenient system for cell biological analysis. Building on earlier results showing that the apical polarity determinant Par3/Bazooka (Baz) is lost from the leading edge of cells during dorsal closure, Tom Millard and colleagues (
Neural crest (NC) cells arise in the neural tube (NT), undergo an epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and migrate away along defined routes, differentiating into multiple lineages. Precisely how NC cells exit the NT, and whether their fate is predetermined by their initial position within the NT, has been controversial. To address these issues, the Kulesa and Bronner laboratories performed a collaborative study (
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) enables dosage compensation between XX females and XY males, and its absence causes lethality, owing to defects in extra-embryonic tissues. However, it has also been shown that some genes are able to escape XCI in these tissues. Here, Catherine Corbel, Edith Heard and colleagues reconcile these findings and show that the inactive X (Xi) in one particular extra-embryonic cell type – trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) – has an unusual chromatin status (
On
Using a similar gene targeting approach, Evelyne Fischer and colleagues (
Freddy Radtke and colleagues review the role of Notch signaling in stem cells, comparing insights from flies, fish and mice to highlight similarities, as well as differences, between species, tissues and stem cell compartments. See the Review article on p.
Zhu and Huangfu discuss how studies of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can complement classic approaches using model organisms, and how hPSCs can be used to recapitulate aspects of human embryonic development ‘in a dish’. See the Review on p.
The Woods Hole image voting