The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

Laboratory Research Scientist

Posted by , on 20 September 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

OVERVIEW

 

We are seeking a highly motivated and collaborative Laboratory Research Scientist in the area of human embryology and stem cell biology to join Dr. Kathy Niakan’s laboratory. The lab has identified several signalling pathways that may be operational in the human embryo to regulate the establishment or maintenance of pluripotent epiblast progenitor cells that can be coaxed to self-renew indefinitely as embryonic stem cells in vitro. The role will involve further characterising the function of these signalling pathways in the human embryo and testing their sufficiency to establish alternative human embryonic stem cells.

 

The successful candidate is likely to be collaborative, energetic, focused, and productive individual. Excellent organisational, analytical, and communication skills are essential.

 

Dr Niakan’s laboratory focuses on understanding the mechanisms of lineage specification in human embryos and the derivation of novel human stem cells. The post holder will report directly to the Group Leader, Kathy Niakan. Details of research projects currently being undertaken can be seen at: http://www.crick.ac.uk/kathy-niakan

 

PROJECT SUMMARY

 

The pluripotent epiblast of the early human embryo has the unique potential to give rise to the entire fetus in vivo and can self-renew indefinitely as embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in vitro. Understanding how this lineage is established is of fundamental biological importance and has significant clinical implications for both infertility treatment and the use of hESCs to treat various diseases. We have identified several components of key signaling pathways that are highly expressed in the epiblast, and whose activity leads to the proliferation of these pluripotent cells in vivo. Based on our preliminary data, we have been awarded an Insight to Innovate Grant to follow up these observations, in collaboration with commercial organisations.

 

The aim of this project is to further characterise how these factors regulate human pluripotency and embryogenesis. We also seek to establish novel culture conditions for human pluripotent stem cells by modulating these signaling pathways during stem cell derivation. In collaboration with our commercial partners, we will evaluate if these conditions better maintain pluripotency of existing hESCs, and how this may translate to improved derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or more efficient directed differentiation protocols.

 

Please note: all offers of employment are subject to successful security screening and continuous eligibility to work in the United Kingdom.

 

To apply please visit https://goo.gl/2meLrn

 

This role closes on  Wednesday 11th October 2017 at 23:30 pm.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Categories: Jobs, Research

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

Post-doc position studying myogenesis in the Zebrafish embryo

Posted by , on 20 September 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

A postdoctoral research position is available starting in the first half of 2018 for a biologist to work with Asst. Prof. Timothy Saunders’ group at the Mechanobiology Institute, Singapore (http://labs.mbi.nus.edu.sg/mod/). The Saunders lab studies the fundamental processes shaping organs and tissues during development.

One major focus in the lab is myogenesis in the developing Zebrafish embryo. We are part of a major five-year grant focused on understanding non-canonical roles of receptor tyrosine kinases in cell regulation, including in vivo. The project will involve live-imaging myogenesis on confocal and light-sheet microscopes and developing detailed four-dimensional maps of myotome development. Reagents, including optogenetic and novel live-markers, will need to be created as part of the project.

Candidates should have extensive experience in at least two of: (1) Zebrafish genetics and general fish capabilities; (2) Biochemistry and construct design; and (3) Quantitative imaging methods and image analysis.  The candidate must be prepared to learn the necessary skills to perform this challenging project.

The project is in collaboration with Prof. Philip Ingham, at the Living Systems Institute, Exeter, UK and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Opportunities are available for lab placements in Prof. Ingham’s lab as part of the project. This offers an opportunity for a dedicated researcher to develop a truly interdisciplinary collaboration.

Interested candidates should contact Timothy Saunders (dbsste@nus.edu.sg), including a CV.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Postdoctoral position – Mechanics of mammalian morphogenesis – Maitre lab at Institut Curie

Posted by , on 19 September 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

Location:
Institut Curie, located in the center of Paris, is an internationally renowned institution bringing together physicists, chemists, biologists, bioinformaticians and clinicians.

Position:
Jean-Leon Maitre, head of the “Mechanics of mammalian development” team (science.institut-curie.org/team-maitre/), is seeking a motivated postdoc with a strong interest in interdisciplinary research.

The candidate will study the morphogenetic events occurring before implantation of the embryo, which requires an approach at the interface between biology and physics (Maître et al, Nat. Cell Biol., 2015; Maître et al, Nature, 2016; Maître, Biol. Cell, 2017). The candidate’s work will include developmental biology techniques with recovery, culture and manipulation of mouse embryos; biophysical techniques such as high-resolution microscopy and micropipette manipulation of embryos; data and image analysis.

Skills:
Prior experience with mouse, advanced microscopy, molecular biology and/or image analysis will be extremely valuable, but on-the-job training will be additionally provided. The ideal candidate should feel comfortable working in an interdisciplinary and international environment.

The position is funded by the ERC for 24 months initially.

Interested candidates should contact jean-leon.maitre@curie.fr

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Allometry in a Simple Cell Network

Posted by , on 19 September 2017

A post by Jasmin Imran Alsous, on work done in collaboration with Paul Villoutreix and Alexander M. Berezhkovskii in the Shvartsman lab.


I started working on Drosophila egg chambers from the day I joined the Shvartsman lab. Egg chambers are small clusters of cells that eventually develop into mature oocytes in the abdomen of the female fruit fly. Perhaps not surprisingly, because the development of gametes, oocytes (or sperm), within such clusters is a conserved feature from insects to mammals, there is much to learn from probing their development within these simpler organisms. As I was taught how to dissect out the egg chambers and take images of the ovarioles – these are strings of egg chambers lined in a chronologically ordered array (Figure 1B) – I knew that regardless of what my project(s) turned out to be, it would have to involve these clusters: their structure was simple and images of the fluorescently labeled egg chambers were really beautiful. Both features meant I would not quickly tire of collecting data and could explain my research to non-biologists and non-scientists in general with little difficulty.

 

Interesting Phenomena in Developing Egg Chambers

Most questions we asked in the lab about how these egg chambers develop arose naturally from simply observing these structure as they formed and grew. First, the egg chamber is a cluster of exactly 16 germline cells that are enveloped by an epithelium. These 16 cells arise from a single founder cell that undergoes four synchronous and incomplete divisions: the cells remain connected through bridges, called ring canals, that allow for intercellular transport and communication (Figure 1A). One of these cells becomes the oocyte, and the other 15 develop into endoreplicating nurse cells that synthesize RNA, proteins, and organelles; these are then transported to the oocyte. Because the divisions are stereotypic, each of the 16 cells is uniquely identifiable, so one of the earliest questions we asked was whether the cells are packed or spatially arranged in a stereotypic manner also (this became the subject of another project). Second, as the egg chamber develops and grows, it does so non-uniformly, i.e. the tremendous gain in volume, by roughly 4 orders of magnitude, is distributed unequally among the 16 cells (Figure 1B). Interestingly, previous studies dating back to the late 50s had made note of this, and I was amazed at how much was known about the egg chamber already – its structure, its cell type composition, the specialized functionalities of the oocyte and nurse cells, its various stages of development –  and frankly, a lot of the questions I was interested in were either posed in one way or another in these initial studies or inspired by them. However, without a proper sample size and comprehensive quantification, which would have been impossible without today’s imaging technologies, it was unclear whether there was a pattern to this nonuniformity, and by which mechanism it arose. The project was then to answer these two questions, and it eventually culminated in our recent Current Biology paper, “Collective Growth in a Small Cell Network”.

 

Figure 1. Differential Growth in the Drosophila Egg Chamber [1]. (A) Schematic representation of the four rounds of divisions that give rise to the  egg chamber. The cells (nodes) remain connected by ring canals (edges). One of the cells with 4 ring canals becomes the oocyte; the other 15 become nurse cells. (B) Volume renderings of two ovarioles with egg chambers arranged chronologically from youngest (left) to oldest (right). Membranes (gray) and nuclei (red) are fluorescently labeled. Each egg chamber is a cluster of 16 germline cells connected as shown in (A) and is encapsulated by an epithelium. Throughout oogenesis, egg chambers grow by ~4 orders of magnitude, with unequal distribution of volume among the germline cells (yellow arrowheads). Scale bar, 10 um.
 

 

Differential Growth: Examples & Mechanisms

This phenomenon, of parts in growing objects growing at different rates, is not an unfamiliar one. Perhaps some of the clearest examples of that are the disproportionately large deer or elk antlers and fiddler crab claws (Figure 2A, B). These structures are evidently growing at faster rates than the animal’s other body parts. Another example closer to home is a human baby during postnatal development: born with a relatively large head and small limbs, the toddler develops into an adult with a proportionally smaller head and larger limbs (Figure 2C).

 

Figure 2. Familiar Examples of Differential Growth. (A) A fiddler crab with a disproportionately large claw [2]. (B) An elk with outsized antlers [3]. (C) Postnatal development of human babies: the final shape of the adult is unobtainable by pure dilation of the toddler [4].
 

 

How such spatiotemporal patterns arise in growing organisms have fascinated researchers since Huxley and Thompson’s times [5, 6], and recently, studies have come up with potential mechanisms to explain these emergent collective growth patterns in model systems. For example, studies have shown that the size discrepancy between the Drosophila wings and halteres, which are a second and smaller pair of appendages (~fivefold fewer cells) used for balance and steering, can be explained by intrinsic differences, i.e. expression of the gene ultrabithorax (ubx) in the imaginal discs in the larva that give rise to the halteres, but not the ones that give rise to the wings (Figure 3A) [7]. Another elegant study showed that the difference in size between the fore and hind wings on butterflies, P. coenia, can be explained by competition for resources among the growing wing appendages (Figure 3, top). This was best exemplified by experiments that surgically removed the patch of cells that give rise to the hind wings: in such butterflies, the researchers noted a compensatory increase in the size of the forewings (Figure 3, bottom) [8]. Although these model systems are considerably simpler than whole organisms, they are still relatively complex: both systems comprise thousands of cells and the developing structures are not independent, but are parts of a whole.

 

Figure 3. Mechanisms for Spatiotemporal Growth Patterns in Model Systems. (A) Schematic showing the imaginal discs in the larva (left) that give rise to the wings (gray) and the halteres (magenta). The halteres are much smaller than the wings in the adult fly (right) due to expression of the gene ultrabithorax in all the cells of their imaginal discs. (B) Top: Schematic showing the imaginal discs in the caterpillars of P. coenia (left) that give rise to the fore-and hindwings in the adult butterfly (right). Bottom: Surgical removal of the imaginal discs that give rise to the hindwings result in a compensatory increase in the size of the forewings.

 

A Correlation & An Observation

Motivated by these examples, we set out to quantify the nonuniformity of cell sizes in the growing egg chamber, and if possible, to describe and mechanistically explain the emergent pattern. To that end, we collected a large number of 3D confocal images of egg chambers that were immunostained to reveal their cell membranes, nuclei and ring canals. Using the stereotypic structure of the cell lineage tree, and starting with the oocyte, labeled as cell 1, we identified and annotated each of the 16 cells (Figure 4A, B). Furthermore, using nuclear and membrane volume measurements of reconstructed egg chambers, we had previously found that nuclear and cell volume correlate strongly, so for our subsequent measurements, we used nuclear volume as a proxy for cell volume – a much more easily measurable parameter than cell volumes: obtaining cell volumes required reconstructing the 3D shapes of each cell in the egg chamber, which involved drawing contours that traced the outlines of the cells’ membranes – a painstakingly slow process because the cells are irregularly shaped and thus far the process has not been automated. These reconstructions also revealed that the nurse cells are spatially organized into layers dictated by the number of ring canals separating any given nurse cell from the oocyte: arranged from posterior (closest) to anterior (furthest) of the oocyte, the numbers of nurse cells that the layers contain are 4, 6, 4, and 1 (Figure 4C).

 

Figure 4. A Layered Arrangement of Cells and an Emergent Pattern of Cell Sizes [1]. (A) Volume-rendered egg chamber showing its 3D structure, with fluorescently labeled nuclear envelopes (gray) and ring canals (red). The oocyte lies at the most posterior location of the egg chamber. (B) The ring canal tree, with nodes (cells) colored based on the number of edges (ring canals) from the oocyte (cell 1, gray). The tree’s invariant structure renders each germline cell uniquely identifiable. (C) Color-coded membrane-based reconstruction of a young egg chamber showing front and back views. Also shown is the layered spatial organization of nurse cells separated from the oocyte by one ring canal (blue), by two ring canals (red), by three ring canals (green), and by four ring canals (yellow), away from the oocyte. (D) A plot of each nurse cell’s average nuclear volume rank (1 = largest) as a function of distance from the oocyte across egg chambers sampled from all stages of oogenesis prior to stage 10 (n = 41). Nurse cells exhibit differential growth, and four groups of nurse cell sizes emerge that correlate with the spatial organization of the cells illustrated in (C). Error bars indicate SE. Scale bars in (A) and (C), 10 um.
 

 

A Pattern of Cell Sizes

Collecting the data was a two-step process. First, we uniquely identified and labeled each of the cells in each collected 3D image of an egg chamber. Second, we collected nuclear volume measurements for each of those cells. To normalize for variations in growth among different egg chambers, we then ranked each nurse cell within each egg chamber by its nuclear volume. This gave us a vector of 15 rank entries, labeled 1–15, with 1 being largest and 15 smallest, and allowed us to calculate an average rank for each cell across all egg chambers. Once we had that data, it was unclear how to proceed or what correlations to look for: cell size as a function of ring canal number? Or cell size as a function of distance from the oocyte as defined on the lineage tree? Both factors were possible and had been proposed as potentially affecting cell size to some degree. After much plotting, it became clear that distance to the oocyte on the lineage tree was the primary factor affecting cell size (Figure 4D). Namely, we found that cells closer to the oocyte rank more highly and that, naturally, four groups of cell sizes emerge that correlate with their layered spatial organization relative to the oocyte. Interestingly, the number of ring canals each cell has appeared to not have much of an influence on cell size, within or across groups (Figure 5A, B).  More importantly, we found that this pattern of cell sizes emerges from uniform initial conditions, only after the 16 cells are enveloped by the epithelium. These measurements, although critical, were more difficult to make: the divisions that give rise to the cyst take place inside a germarium, which is a structure at the vary anterior tip of the ovariole. This structure contains the stem cell niche and is extremely packed and crowded: identifying separate cysts and labeling the cells from 1-16 required high resolution images in x, y and z, a lot of zooming in and forgoing any sense of urgency.

 

Figure 5. Number of Ring Canals is Not the Primary Factor Affecting Cell Size [1]. A) A plot of each cell’s average rank as a function its ring canal number. B) A plot of intra-group average rank for each of the 16 germline cells; cells within a group were ranked relative to each other. There is no specific nurse cell nuclear volume distribution within a group that can be explained by the number of ring canals each cell has (in parenthesis). Error bars indicate SE (n=41).
 

 

Origin of This Pattern

Having established the pattern of cell sizes, our next step was to come up with the simplest mathematical model that can both explain our observations and make predictions. This process of developing and writing out the model was perhaps the most exciting, but the most iterative: the model was written and re-written more times than I can remember, mainly because at each iteration, we found that the model could be simplified further. In fact, the final version that appears in the paper is a model that exhibits how differential growth arises already in a 2-cell system, and how groups of cell sizes arise in a 4-cell system; these results are easily generalizable to the 16-cell system and there was little need to write out the equations for all 16 cells in the main body of the paper (these made their cumbersome way to the supplementary material).

We started with a coarse-grained model whose variables corresponded to cell volumes,  which increase according to Monod-like kinetics: proportional to the product of the current cell volume of cell  and a monotonically increasing function of the intracellular concentration of some limiting component (Figure 7B). Intuitively, differences in the cellular concentrations of the limiting factor result in different specific growth rates among the cells. Notably, we were unsure as to what that limiting component was: was it a nutrient, a protein, an organelle? Were there several limiting components? The study alluded to in figure 3B that established that the size discrepancy between the fore and hind wings in the butterfly was due to competition for resources remained “deliberately vague” as to the nature of the shared components, so we felt emboldened to do just the same. Figuring out the nature of that component became an item on the future works agenda.

We then postulated that this component is exchanged among the cells and that this exchange is polarized, such that the probability of being transported through a ring canal connecting any two cells is higher in the direction of the more posterior cell, i.e. the cell closer to the oocyte. Here we also defined the parameter v, which quantifies the asymmetry of transport through the ring canals such that when transport is polarized in the posterior direction, v<1.  Notably, this bias in transport across the ring canals is made possible by a polarized network of microtubules that is set up following specification of the oocyte and that extends from the oocyte to the nurse cells through the ring canals, connecting all cells within the germline cyst (Figure 6A) [9, 10]. Furthermore, several particle tracking studies in developing egg chambers showed that particles diffuse randomly in the cytoplasm of the cell, and while particles can diffuse bi-directionally across a ring canal, once at a ring canal, these particles exhibit a posterior bias in their translocation (Figure 6B) [11, 12, 13, 14].

 

Figure 6. Inter- and Intra-cellular Transport. (A) Schematic of an egg chamber illustrating the network of microtubules (MTs) that extends from the oocyte to the nurse cells through the ring canals (modified from [9]) (B) Particles diffuse randomly in the cytoplasm of the cell, and while particles can diffuse bi-directionally across a ring canal (gray spots), once at a ring canal, these particles exhibit a posterior bias in their translocation (green arrows).
 

 

We also assumed that concentrations within the cell cluster equilibrate rapidly and can therefore be considered at steady state on the much longer timescale of growth of the cyst. This assumption was based on the difference between our estimate of the time it takes a diffusing particle to reach a circular window of some radius on the wall of a cell with some volume, and the time scale for growth. The former was estimated to be around 10 minutes; the latter, ~ 3 days. Note that it helped that our advisor and our collaborator (SYS and AMB) had co-authored a paper on the kinetics of escape through a small hole – one of the main results of that paper was an analytical expression for the rate constant of escape, k, in terms of the problem’s parameters: the diffusion constant, D, of the particle, the hole radius, a, and the cavity volume V : k=4Da/V [15].

We then wrote out equations illustrating how the fluxes between any two connected cells balance, and given that the fluxes can be expressed in terms of a rate constant for diffusion multiplied by the cellular concentration of our limiting component, this gave us relationships that related (1) the concentrations between any two anterior and posterior cells separated by either a single ring canal and (2) the intercellular concentration of any anterior cell relative to the oocyte, cell 1. Based on these assumptions alone, the model explained both the observed pattern of differential growth and the emergence of groups in wild type egg chambers. Specifically, when transport is polarized toward the founder cell, i.e. v<1, the 2-cell system gives us differential growth (Figure 7C), and the 4-cell system gives us both differential growth and emergence of (three) groups (Figure 7D). These results were easily generalizable to the 16-cell cyst.

 

Figure 7. A Biophysical Model for Differential Growth and Emergence of Groups [1].
 (A) Schematic representation of the ring canal tree arranged to highlight the anterior nurse cells’ spatial organization as it relates to the posterior oocyte (A, anterior; P, posterior). Each cell (node) is numbered (1–16), and each layer j is labeled (B) A plot of the specific growth rate, f(c), as a function of concentration, c, showing the linear and saturated regimes. (C) Schematic representation of a 2-cell cluster whose cells are connected by a ring canal. Each cell i, of volume V, grows according to the growth law shown. Diffusing particles of concentration, c, in the cells’ cytoplasm that arrive at the ring canal have a higher probability of being transported from an anterior (A) cell to the more posterior (P) cell than in the opposite direction. The result is that two cells, initially of uniform size, will grow at unequal rates, with cell 1 (posterior) getting larger than cell 2 (anterior). (D) Schematic representation of a 4-cell cluster whose cells are connected by ring canals. Allowing for polarized transport in the posterior direction, the 4-cell cluster model leads both to differential growth and to the emergence of 3 groups of cell sizes that correlate with the spatial arrangement of the layers relative to cell 1.
 

Our model also made a prediction, namely, that in the absence of a polarized transport network and polarized transport (v=1), cells in the growing cluster would be of the same size. We therefore examined mutants that fail to set up a polarized microtubule cytoskeleton for transport. Luckily, there are several such mutants available but we chose egalitarian (egl) in which no oocyte is specified, the formation and maintenance of a polarized microtubule network are disrupted, and all 16 cells develop into polyploid nurse cells [9]. We showed that in such mutants, the group-wise arrangement of cell sizes observed in wild type egg chambers was absent: the average size ranks of cells from virtually all groups overlap. These results suggested that the relative absence of both differential growth and emergence of groups of cell sizes is attributable to the absence of a polarized transport within the cluster.

 

Allometric scaling

We were pretty happy with the model: it was simple, had few assumptions and could explain our observations in both wild type and mutant egg chambers. But we wondered whether we had extracted all of what the model had to offer, and we had not. By making an additional assumption, namely that we were in the linear regime of the proposed growth law (shown in Figure 7B), we could extract a quantitative relationship between the volumes of cells belonging to different layers in the cell network in terms of already-defined problem parameters.

 

Figure 8. Allometric Scaling in Collective Cell Growth [1]. To extract v, we fit the logarithmic form of the equation shown in the figure to data pairs of nuclear volumes of nurse cells from consecutive layers j and j + 1. The extracted value of v is consistent with biased transport toward the posterior oocyte. The insets show representative color-coded membrane-based reconstruction of a young, roughly spherical egg chamber (bottom left), an egg chamber beginning to elongate (middle), and an older ellipsoidal egg chamber (top right). Scale bars, 10 um.
 

This result now predicted a specific quantitative pattern for a thus far qualitative observation, namely, that the pattern of decreasing cell sizes with distance from the oocyte at any moment in time can be quantified with an allometric-type relationship. The only parameter here was v, which linked a process occurring at the molecular scale, transport of an intracellular limiting component, to an observable phenotype, cell size. To estimate v, took the natural logarithm of both sides of the equation in the previous paragraph: the value of v was then given by the slope of the line that best fits through pairs of nuclear volumes of nurse cells from consecutive layers j and j + 1; each egg chamber has 52 such pairs (Figure 8). This lead to v =0.86±0.01. For this value of , which is less than 1, transport is polarized (biased towards the oocyte), and a growing egg chamber will have four groups of nurse cells that exhibit a posterior-to-anterior gradient of decreasing cell sizes, which is consistent with what we observed experimentally.

We were particularly happy with this result because in addition to deriving the quantitative relation between volumes of cells from different layers, we also extracted the parameter characterizing the extent of polarized transport within the cluster, thus linking a subcellular molecular process to an emergent pattern of collective cell growth. It is not often that one can link processes that span different scales in biology, regardless of how phenomenological the starting model is, and being able to come back full circle to Huxley’s allometries is cool.

This paper was perhaps one of the most rewarding project I had been involved in so far – mainly because we finally answered basic questions about growing egg chambers that we had been interested in for quite some time, and because the model that explained our results was relatively simple and could be dissected and understood to the end. Perhaps the biggest challenge in writing up the paper was deciding how to most clearly explain our experimental observations and theoretical results to a broad community of cell, developmental, and quantitative biologists, as well as applied mathematicians: we wanted to avoid writing a cumbersome paper but not at the risk of imprecision. However, having several lab mates, collaborators and, of course, co-authors from various backgrounds who read and re-read the manuscript streamlined that process and ensured that we used the most correct yet simplest terminology, so thanks friends.

 

References

[1] Imran Alsous, J., Villoutreix, P., Berezhkovskii, A.M., and Shvartsman, S.Y. (2017). Collective growth in a small cell network. Current Biology. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.038.

[2] Australian National University. “Size Doesn’t Matter to Fighting Fiddler Crabs.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 8 January 2008. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080101192723.htm>.

[3] “Deer Antler Velvet—What Is It, How Does It Work?” National Geographic, 1, February 2013 <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/01/130130-deer-velvet-antler-spray-science-health-football-sports/>.

[4] “Growing up (and out, and sideways, and around)…” Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP), 23, December 2013.  < http://vertpaleo.org/Society-News/Blog/Old-Bones-SVP-s-Blog/December-2013/Growing-up-(and-out,-and-sidways,-and-around).aspx>.

[5] Thompson, D.W. (1917). On Growth and Form (Cambridge University Press).

[6] Huxley, J.S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth (Methuen).

[7] Crickmore, M.A., and Mann, R.S. (2006). Hox control of organ size by regulation of morphogen production and mobility. Science 313, 63-68.

[8] Nijout, F.A., and Emlen, D.J. (1998). Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. PNAS 95, 3685-3689.

[9] Theurkauf, W.E., Alberts, B.M., Jan, Y.N., and Jongens, T.A. (1993). A central role for microtubules in the differentiation of Drosophila oocytes. Development 118, 1169–1180.

[10] Theurkauf, W.E., Smiley, S., Wong, M.L., and Alberts, B.M. (1992). Reorganization of the cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis: implications for axis specification and intercellular transport. Development 115, 923–936.

[11] Bohrmann, J., and Biber, K. (1994). Cytoskeleton-dependent transport of cytoplasmic particles in previtellogenic to mid-vitellogenic ovarian follicles of Drosophila: time-lapse analysis using video-enhanced contrast microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 107, 849–858.

[12] Nicolas, E., Chenouard, N., Olivo-Marin, J.C., and Guichet, A. (2009). A dual role for actin and microtubule cytoskeleton in the transport of Golgi units from the nurse cells to the oocyte across ring canals. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 556–568.

[13] Snee, M.J., and Macdonald, P.M. (2004). Live imaging of nuage and polar granules: evidence against a precursor-product relationship and a novel role for Oskar in stabilization of polar granule components. J. Cell Sci. 117, 2109–2120.

[14] Shimada, Y., Burn, K.M., Niwa, R., and Cooley, L. (2011). Reversible response of protein localization and microtubule organization to nutrient stress during Drosophila early oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 355, 250–262.

[15] Grigoriev, I.V., Makhnovskii, Y.A., Berezhkovskii, A.M., and Zitserman, V.Y. (2002). Kinetics of escape through a small hole. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9574.

 

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Images, Lab Life, Research, Science Art

In Development this week (Vol. 144, Issue 18)

Posted by , on 19 September 2017

Here are the highlights from the current issue of Development:

 

Separating nematode species by spermatogenesis

Embedded Image

During spermatogenesis, unnecessary organelles and cytoplasmic components are shed from developing sperm in order to streamline them for optimal motility. These components are partitioned into structures known as ‘residual bodies’, which subsequently separate from the sperm and are lost. In the nematode worm C. elegans, this partitioning occurs immediately after the meiotic divisions, thus accelerating the process of sperm production. On p. 3253, Diane Shakes and colleagues exploit the interspecies diversity in spermatogenesis among nematodes to reveal how cellular components become partitioned. Focussing on the role of microtubules and actin, they characterise the process in C. elegans and in another nematode species, Rhabditis sp. SB347, and find important mechanistic variations between the two. In Rhabditis, which produces small spermatocytes, two rather than four sperm are generated during meiosis; the rest of the genetic material is partitioned into residual bodies. Interestingly, this mirrors oocyte production and resulting polar-body formation in females. These results provide insight into both the conserved and divergent mechanisms that underpin partitioning during spermatogenesis, and reveal how these segregation mechanisms can be modulated to achieve differences between species.

 

Sending signals through SMADs: how blood flow shapes arteries

Embedded Image

During organogenesis, mechanical forces can induce transcriptional and cytoskeletal changes in cells that help shape tissues as they develop. However, the mechanisms allowing cells to sense and respond to these mechanical signals are poorly understood. In the cardiovascular system, endothelial cells, which line the arteries, are able to change their shape in response to high or low blood flow through an artery, resulting in a change to the vessel’s diameter. On p. 3241, Kristy Red-Horse and colleagues investigate how mechanical signals are transduced by endothelial cells to regulate the size of arteries, and show that SMAD4 signalling mediates this response. When SMAD4 is deleted in mice, coronary artery size is increased, subsequent to the onset of blood flow. They also show that in human coronary artery endothelial cells cultured in vitro, knockdown of SMAD4 leads to defects in flow-guided cell elongation and migration. Additionally, they find that these cells undergo increased proliferation when exposed to shear stress. Their data directly link BMP/SMAD signalling to endothelial changes in response to mechanical force. These results increase our understanding of how forces can regulate tissue development during embryogenesis, and might be important in developing treatments for human vascular pathologies.

 

Opening up: new insights into chromatin decondensation

Embedded Image

During heat shock, cells respond to temperature stress by opening their chromatin, allowing the transcription of genes that enable them to cope with the sudden change in the environment. How chromatin becomes decondensed to permit active transcription during this process is not clear. Recently, a model based on experiments in Drosophila has been proposed, whereby histone H2Av is deposited and subsequently phosphorylated by JIL-1 kinase, followed by recruitment of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1). PolyADP-ribosylation of chromatin then takes place, which loosens its structure. This permits phosphorylation of serine 10 in the tail of histone H3 (H3S10p), again by JIL-1 kinase, which is required for the function of the transcriptional machinery. On p. 3232, Kristen Johansen and colleagues test this model using null mutants and find that H2Av phosphorylation and chromatin opening can occur in the absence of JIL-1 kinase, and that H3S10p still occurs in a PARP-1 knockdown mutant. In light of these findings, the proposed model breaks down. Instead, the authors find that PARP-1 can be recruited by H3S10p independently of H2Av, providing insight into an alternative mechanism for opening up of chromatin structure to permit active transcription in Drosophila.

 

Histone demethylase functions in fertility

Embedded Image

The acquisition and removal of epigenetic marks can help modulate gene expression during development by altering chromatin structure. Di- or tri-methylation of histone H3 on lysines 9 and 36 (H3K9/36) is associated with gene repression and silencing, since these marks induce a closed chromatin state. Kdm4a is an enzyme that demethylates H3K9/36, and functions to prevent the build-up of methyl groups at these sites in order to maintain active transcription. On p. 3264, Kristian Helin and colleagues now reveal a role for Kdm4a in female fertility. They show that this histone demethylase is expressed in all tissues of the female reproductive system, including the oocyte. While mice lacking the enzyme are able to ovulate and fertilise embryos normally, pregnancies fail because the embryos do not implant in most cases. Although the morphology of the reproductive tract is not altered in these animals, gene expression analysis shows that genes important for uterine receptivity are downregulated. Furthermore, maternal Kdm4a is also required in the oocyte to generate viable embryos, with knockout embryos arresting within the first few days after fertilisation. These results provide insight into how chromatin regulation through epigenetic factors can impact on physiological processes, including fertility.

 

PLUS…

 

An interview with George Daley

Embedded ImageGeorge Daley is Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Professor of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, and Caroline Shields Walker Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. A former Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator and President of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) from 2007-2008, his lab works on the biology and clinical application of stem cells, with a particular focus on hematopoiesis. He was awarded the Public Service Award at the ISSCR 2017 meeting in Boston, where we caught up with him to discuss his move from the lab to the clinic and back again, his quest to derive human hematopoietic stem cells in vitro, and his advocacy for science in uncertain political times. Read the Spotlight article.

 

Metabolism in time and space – exploring the frontier of developmental biology

EES_logoIn May 2017, a diverse group of scientists assembled at the EMBO/EMBL Symposium ‘Metabolism in Time and Space’ to discuss how metabolism influences cellular and developmental processes. The speakers not only described how metabolic flux adapts to the energetic needs of a developing organism, but also emphasized that metabolism can directly regulate developmental progression. Overall, this interdisciplinary meeting provided a valuable forum to explore the interface between developmental biology and metabolism. Read the Meeting Review by Alena Krejci and Jason Tennessen.

 

The enigma of embryonic diapause

Embryonic diapause – a period of embryonic suspension at the blastocyst stage – is a fascinating phenomenon that occurs in over 130 species of mammals, ranging from bears and badgers to mice and marsupials. It might even occur in humans. During diapause, there is minimal cell division and greatly reduced metabolism, and development is put on hold. Yet there are no ill effects for the pregnancy when it eventually continues. Multiple factors can induce diapause, including seasonal supplies of food, temperature, photoperiod and lactation. The successful reactivation and continuation of pregnancy then requires a viable embryo, a receptive uterus and effective molecular communication between the two. In their Primer article, Marilyn Renfree and Jane Fenelon provide an overview of the process of diapause, focusing on recent molecular data.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Research

Postdoc position in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-based Cell Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes

Posted by , on 19 September 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

The goal of this project is to engineer therapeutically active islet-like aggregates for future cell therapy phase 1 trials in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).

Job Description:
We are looking for a postdoctoral candidate with a strong cell biological and cell signaling background in directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cell biology. Experience in differentiation towards pancreatic lineages is a merit. The candidate is expected to work on the engineering of human pluripotent stem cell-derived islet of Langerhans-like aggregates with functional properties close to human islets. The functionality and therapeutic potential of the aggregates will be tested in vitro and in vivo in mice. The candidate is expected to use state-of-the-art genetics, molecular and cell biological, and tissue engineering experimental strategies. The candidate will work together with a dedicated team of scientists and technicians who together will tackle bottle-necks towards implementing the phase 1 clinical trials in T1D.
Qualifications:
The candidate is required to hold a PhD degree in pluripotent stem cell/developmental biology. A few years of postdoctoral experience in the same areas is a merit. The candidate should also have hands on experience in human pluripotent stem cell maintenance and differentiation, 3D culture of pluripotent stem cells, various cell and molecular biological methods, flow cytometry and live-cell imaging. Finally, we are looking for applicants with a good record of peer reviewed scientific publications, grant writing skills and an interest in team work.
Employment Conditions:  
The position is for 2 years with a possible extension. The employment is planned to start as soon as possible or upon agreement with the chosen candidate.
The terms of employment are set according to the Agreement between the Ministry of Finance and The Danish Confederation of Professional Associations or other relevant professional organization. The position will be at the level of postdoctoral fellow and the basic salary according to seniority is 32.700-34.400 DKK/month. A supplement could be negotiated, dependent on the candidate´s experiences and qualifications. In addition, a monthly contribution of 17.1% of the salary is paid into a pension fund.
Applicants recruited from abroad may be eligible for a special researcher taxation scheme. In all cases, the ability to perform the job will be the primary consideration, and thus we encourage all – regardless of their personal background and status – to apply.
For further information contact Professor Henrik Semb, Henrik.semb@sund.ku.dk
International applicants may find the following links useful: UCHP’s international dept. ISM on http://ism.ku.dk/  and Work In Denmark on https://www.workindenmark.dk/
Application instruction: 
The application must be submitted online and in English, by clicking on “Apply online” below.
The closing date for applications is 23.59pm, November 1st 2017. 
The application must include:
  • Cover letter detailing the basis on which the applicant scientific qualifications meet the requirements for this position.
  • Curriculum vitae.
  • List of references (full address, incl. email and phone number)
  • Diplomas – all relevant certificates.
  • List of publications.
Application procedure:
After the expiry of the deadline for applications, the authorized recruitment manager selects applicants for assessment on the advice of the Appointments Committee. All applicants are then immediately notified whether their application has been passed for assessment by an expert assessment committee. Selected applicants are notified of the composition of the committee and each applicant has the opportunity to comment on his/her assessment. You may read about the recruitment process on http://employment.ku.dk/faculty/recruitment-process
DanStem and The University of Copenhagen wish to reflect the diversity of society and welcome applications from all qualified candidates, regardless of personal background.
Founded in 1479, the University of Copenhagen is the oldest university in Denmark. With 37,000 students and 9,000 employees, it is among the largest universities in Scandinavia and one of the highest ranking in Europe. The University consists of six faculties, which cover Health and Medical Sciences, Humanities, Law, Science, Social Sciences and Theology.  

APPLY NOW

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Two postdoc positions (1x Bioinformatics and 1x wet lab) in single cell biology of cell fate commitment at University College London

Posted by , on 19 September 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

Two postdoc positions (1x bioinformatics and 1x wet lab) are available at University College London. Our lab studies how cell fate choice and proportioning is robust and reproducible, despite the fact that extensive cell-cell variation is generated by noise and stochasticity, which can cause heterogeneous gene network activity. Therefore to understand how cell fate choice and patterning are achieved during development and regeneration, we are trying to determine:

(1) How are the gene networks that regulate differentiation affected by noise and stochasticty?
(2) Do differentiating cells all follow the same path towards the differentiated state?

Until recently, however, it has been impossible to follow the behaviour of entire gene networks in individual cells, or to follow their temporal changes in activity in individual cells as they differentiate along different linages. Single cell gene expression analysis, together with novel computational reconstruction of gene network dynamics provides this opportunity. Therefore, in this project you will use powerful new single cell RNA-sequencing approaches to follow changes in gene expression over time in individual differentiating cells.

You will join a multidisciplinary team led by Professor Chris Thompson, following our move to UCL in September 2017. This work builds upon our recent discovery of a novel robust developmental circuitbased on an ultradian cell fate oscillator. The approaches used in the lab include transcriptomics, functional genomics, molecular genetics, live cell imaging, and mathematical modeling.

Key Requirements
Candidates with extensive experience of using either computational genomic approaches (Position 1) or wet lab approaches (Position 2) to understand the molecular basis of gene networks will be considered. You should currently hold or be about to obtain a PhD in Computational, Cell, Molecular or Developmental Biology.

The post funded by the Wellcome Trust and is available for 18 months in the first instance (with possibility of extension).

(Grade 7, Salary (inclusive of London allowance) £34,635 – £41,864 per annum)

If you would like to discuss the post please contact Professor Chris Thompson, christopher.thompson@ucl.ac.uk

To learn more about our work visit: https://thethompsonlab.wordpress.com

For any queries regarding the application process, please contact Biosciences Staffing on biosciences.staffing@ucl.ac.uk and quote the reference 1670534

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

New Intern on the Node

Posted by , on 18 September 2017

Hello readers of the Node! My name is Sarah and I’m delighted to meet the Node readership as the new intern on the Node, hopefully I will be communicating and interacting with many of you over the next three months.

Please allow me to introduce myself and tell you a little bit about myself. I am currently undertaking a BBSRC PhD in Dr Thomas Pratt’s research lab at the University of Edinburgh. A component of this programme is a three-month internship to allow us to experience careers outside the traditional academic job trajectory and I am fortunate enough to undertake my internship with the Node. My background is developmental neurobiology, with my PhD focusing on understanding the concert of genes that act to control human foetal cerebral cortex development and how disruptions to this can contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders.

For years now I have been fascinated by the incredible complexity of all aspects of development and how the multitude of processes acts flawlessly in concert to generate the complete organism. The Node is a place that encompasses the vast spectrum of development; from the computational modelling, single cell studies, to complete organisms into one space for biologists to learn, explore new avenues of research and simply enjoy the wonder of it all. I am so excited to be a part of this online community for all researchers and I hope I can contribute to making it a more enjoyable resource for you all.

Thumbs up (7 votes)
Loading...

Tags: ,
Categories: News

Postdoctoral Fellowship in the Cell Biology of Tubulogenesis and its impact on Cell Differentiation at the Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology (DanStem)

Posted by , on 15 September 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen

 

Background

The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology – DanStem has been established as a result of a series of international recruitments coupled with internationally recognized research groups focused on insulin producing beta cells and cancer research already located at the University of Copenhagen. DanStem addresses basic research questions in stem cell and developmental biology and has activities focused on the translation of promising basic research results into new strategies and targets for the development of new therapies for cancer and chronic diseases such as diabetes and liver failure. Find more information about the Center at http://danstem.ku.dk/.

Job Description
We are looking for a postdoctoral candidate with a strong developmental biology/cell signaling background and/or a biological image processing background to study the cellular and molecular mechanisms of lumenogenesis and tubulogenesis and their role in balancing cell proliferation and differentiation of multipotent progenitors in the developing pancreas. The candidate is expected to use both in vivo (mouse) and in vitro (human pluripotent stem cells) experimental models. The position is for 2 years with possible extension. The employment is planned to start December 1st 2017 or upon agreement with the chosen candidate.

Qualifications
The candidate is required to hold a PhD degree in stem cell/developmental/cell biology/biological image processing. A few years of postdoctoral experience in the same areas is a merit. A candidate with biological background should also have hands on experience in mouse genetics, micro dissection of mouse embryonic organs, human pluripotent stem cell culture and differentiation, live-cell imaging, quantitative image analysis. A candidate with image processing background should have experience with segmentation and tracking in large 3D datasets and an interest in learning to work with the biological techniques described above. Finally, we are looking for applicants with a good record of peer reviewed scientific publications and grant writing skills.

Employment Conditions
The terms of employment are set according to the Agreement between the Ministry of Finance and The Danish Confederation of Professional Associations or other relevant professional organization. The position will be at the level of postdoctoral fellow and the basic salary according to seniority is 32.700-34.400 DKK/month. A supplement could be negotiated, dependent on the candidate´s experiences and qualifications. In addition a monthly contribution of 17.1% of the salary is paid into a pension fund. Applicants that are recruited from abroad may be eligible for a special researcher taxation scheme. In all cases, the ability to perform the job will be the primary consideration, and thus we encourage all – regardless of their personal background and status – to apply.

For further information contact Professor Henrik Semb, henrik.semb@sund.ku.dk

Foreign applicants may find the following links useful: www.ism.ku.dk (International Staff Mobility) and www.workingconditions.ku.dk.

Application Instruction
The application must be submitted in English, by clicking on “Apply online” below. Only online applications will be accepted. The closing date for applications is 23.59pm, November 1st 2017.

The application must include:

  • Cover letter detailing the basis on which the applicant scientific qualifications meet the requirements for this position.
  • Curriculum vitae.
  • List of references (full address, incl. email and phone number)
  • Diplomas – all relevant certificates.
  • List of publications.

Application procedure
After the expiry of the deadline for applications, the authorized recruitment manager selects applicants for assessment on the advice of the Appointments Committee. All applicants are then immediately notified whether their application has been passed for assessment by an expert assessment committee. Selected applicants are notified of the composition of the committee and each applicant has the opportunity to comment on his/her assessment. You may read about the recruitment process at http://employment.ku.dk. DanStem and The University of Copenhagen wish to reflect the diversity of society and welcome applications from all qualified candidates, regardless of personal background.

Apply online

Link for general info on the recruitment process: http://employment.ku.dk/faculty/recruitment-process 

Founded in 1479, the University of Copenhagen is the oldest university in Denmark. With 37,000 students and 9,000 employees, it is among the largest universities in Scandinavia and one of the highest ranking in Europe. The University consists of six faculties, which cover Health and Medical Sciences, Humanities, Law, Science, Social Sciences and Theology.
Part of the International Alliance of Research Universities (IARU), and among Europe’s top-ranking universities, the University of Copenhagen promotes research and teaching of the highest international standard. Rich in tradition and modern in outlook, the University gives students and staff the opportunity to cultivate their talent in an ambitious and informal environment. An effective organisation – with good working conditions and a collaborative work culture – creates the ideal framework for a successful academic career.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Jobs

Mechanical control of the inner ear development

Posted by , on 14 September 2017

Prologue

Molecular biological approaches to understanding the complex gene networks regulating development often resemble attempts to understand a Monet painting by looking at it up close. We find the links within a disorganized array of brush strokes and shapes but may miss the big picture. Our recent study is an example of how one must sometimes take few steps back to admire the water lilies.

 

Why do we study inner ear development?

The subject of our investigation is a vestibular sensory organ—the utricle (Fig. 1). Our ability to perceive accelerations and to orient ourselves in three-dimensional space relies upon the operation of this and four other vestibular organs within the inner ear (Utricle and Saccule balance and equilibrium). Despite the differences in their functions, the vestibular organs as well as the hearing organ, or cochlea, are populated by the same type of mechanosensitive receptors—the hair cells. Mammals develop a specific number of these cells during embryonic development; no additional hair cells are formed throughout life, and once lost, these sensory receptors cannot be restored naturally. Hair cells are vulnerable to many environmental and health hazards that are prevalent in industrialized countries: loud noises, certain antibiotics, and anticancer drugs. As a result, deficiencies of hearing and balance often occur owing to the irreversible loss of hair cells. Regeneration of the sensory receptors represents a promising approach for treating these disorders. However, understanding the molecular basis of sensory organ development is a necessary first step towards making this treatment a reality.

 

Figure 1. In this preparation of the sensory portion of the utricle, hair cells are labeled in green. Supporting cell nuclei and a subset of the hair cell nuclei are labeled in red.

 

The original idea for our work

The size of each of the inner ear sensory organs, such as the utricle, shows miniscule variation, suggesting a tight control of growth. Whereas many molecular pathways that stimulate sensory cell proliferation during early development have been identified, the growth control mechanism that arrests proliferation in these organs has not been understood. By combining computational modeling and molecular biology we sought to investigate this mechanism in the utricle (Gnedeva et al., 2017).

Instead of looking first at the molecular, “up close” level by investigating the gene-expression changes accompanying development of the utricle, we decided to take a few steps back and to apply a macroscopic, engineering approach to understand the mechanisms controlling its growth. By measuring the changes in area of the utricle during development starting at embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5), we found that the organ’s growth slows as the utricle approaches its final size by postnatal day 2 (P2) (Fig. 2). In other words, the rate of the organ’s growth correlates negatively with its size. This observation suggested a self-regulatory mechanism of epithelial growth and implied a negative-feedback mechanism—a previously unexplored possibility of growth control in sensory organs of the inner ear.

 

Figure 2. In this preparation of the sensory portion of the utricle, supporting cells are labeled in green (left panels). A decrease in the slope of the curve representing the area of the utricle as a function of time (graph on the right) demonstrates that the growth rate decreases as the organ approaches its final size.

 

Surprisingly, in biological systems only two major self-regulatory negative feedback mechanisms are known to regulate organ growth. The first was discovered when in vitro studies demonstrated that many cell types produce morphogens that suppress their own proliferation. One of the first examples of such molecules is a member of the TGF-β family of morphogens—myostatin, which is produced by skeletal muscles to inhibit their growth. Many homologous molecules have since been discovered to control growth in various other tissues.

The second mechanism of growth control is related to mechanical constraints. It has long been observed that cells cease to proliferate in culture when they fill up the available space. The molecular basis of this phenomenon, called contact inhibition of cell growth, has recently been discovered. In brief, cell-cell contacts, as well as changes in pressure and tissue stiffness, can activate the Hippo signaling pathway. The Hippo kinase cascade subsequently targets the transcriptional cofactors Yap and Taz, resulting in their degradation; this in turn inhibits cell growth and proliferation.

In our work we created morphogen-limited and elasticity-limited computational models to incorporate each of the two growth control mechanisms and to explore which one of them is more dominant in regulating cell proliferation in the utricle.

 

What did we discover?

Because the models included the negative-feedback control of growth, they could both accurately reproduce the observed pattern of utricular area expansion. To distinguish between the models, we developed an ex vivo culture system that allowed for manipulation of the elastic force independently of the morphogen concentration in the system.

We found that reducing the mechanical constraints normally present during development led to a striking expansion of utricular area (Fig. 3). This demonstration that elastic force retards the growth of the utricle suggested the involvement of the Hippo signaling cascade. Our experimental data confirmed this prediction: the excessive growth observed in low-stiffness conditions was triggered by the accumulation and nuclear translocation of Yap protein—the direct target of Hippo signaling (Fig. 3).

 

Figure 3. Force controls cell proliferation in the utricle. In these preparations of the sensory portions of utricles (top panels), supporting cells (SCs) are labeled in green and proliferating cells are labeled in white. The supporting cell nuclei of growth-arrested utricles, which have been subjected to mechanical constraints, show limited cytoplasmic Yap staining (bottom left panel). In contrast, an actively growing utricle with low mechanical constraints demonstrates nuclear Yap localization (bottom right panel).

 

We confirmed that the pattern of cell proliferation normally observed in the developing utricle can be explained by the distribution of the forces in the tissue, as predicted by the model, and accords with the expression pattern of Yap protein. Importantly, we also found that the role of Yap is not limited to development; nuclear Yap translocation is also induced during the limited regeneration observed in the utricle. Because cell proliferation is a first step necessary for recovery of the inner ear sensory functions, we predict that altering Hippo signaling might induce regeneration. The strength of this approach, as opposed to gene therapy, is that the kinases in the Hippo pathway can be targeted pharmacologically. Although further investigation of the role of Hippo signaling in the inner ear is required, biochemical manipulation of this pathway might aid in the recovery of hearing and balance after the loss of hair cells.

 

In conclusion

Methodological advances during the past few decades have progressively specialized and separated the branches of biological research. Although this specialization has led to great progress in our understanding of living matter at a deeper level, the separation has come at a cost. It is increasingly clear that a cross-disciplinary approach can restore a broader perspective and facilitate the investigation of complex biological systems. Our work constitutes another example of the benefits of such an approach. A combination of mathematical and biological methodologies has allowed us to uncover a growth control mechanism regulating the development of sensory epithelia in the inner ear. Our hope is that building upon our original model, for example by adding the processes of cell differentiation and cell death, can yield an understanding of other aspects of inner ear development, such as the mechanism of pattern formation and regeneration in the system.


All the illustrations are adopted from the original article:

Gnedeva K.*, Jacobo A.*, Salvi J., Petelski A., and Hudspeth A. J. Elastic force restricts the growth of the murine utricle. eLife in press (2017). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.25681

* These authors contributed equally to the manuscript

Thumbs up (4 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Research, Science Art