The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

Book Review: Developmental Biology, A Very Short Introduction

Posted by , on 1 March 2012

Book Info:  Developmental Biology: A Very Short Introduction by Lewis Wolpert. Aug 2011. 152 pages. ISBN: 9780199601196 (Paperback) Price: $11.95 /£7.99

Book coverThe very first sentence Lewis Wolpert writes in Developmental Biology: A Very Short Introduction communicates the sense of wonder that seeps amongst developmental biologists: “that we develop from a single cell, the fertilized egg, just one tenth of a millimeter in diameter—smaller than full stop—is amazing. That egg has all the information to develop into a human being.”

And with this sentence begins a marvelous journey into the world of life. Wolpert navigates effortlessly in the complexities of the flowering of life to eloquently synthesise the process of development. From the cell to the embryo to the fetus, Wolpert fabulously explains the process through which life sprouts and develops into a mature organism. Make no mistake though, this book is no popular science. It is very much an academic look into the field of developmental biology.

But what makes this book so different from the developmental biology volumes on library shelves is obviously its size. At 152 pages, it makes up for a quick read and is a good book to carry around if you are new to the field. Major concepts are concisely explained and the illustrations are sometimes all you need to understand what’s going on (I mean what better way to understand the development of genitalia in humans than a diagram).

For an academic book, Developmental Biology: A Very Short Introduction is refreshingly refreshing! Why? Because Wolpert is not only interested in explaining concepts here and there. Instead, he wants to provide readers with an overall and complete view of developmental biology. He wants us to see how the different concepts, mechanisms, processes intertwine with one another to culminate into incredibly sophisticated vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. He explains, synthesises and ultimately frames everything into the bigger picture. Not only is this style exciting and makes for a better read but it also makes for better understanding because Wolpert always tells you where he is going. Wolpert even asks some atypical questions. For example, can an embryo be considered a human? Or is DNA really the blueprint of life?

However the book does not come without its headaches—literally. I got headaches while reading the book for two very different reasons. Firstly, the book does not shy away from jargons (it is after all an academic book) and it’s hard to keep up. Although jargons are dutifully explained, they keep cropping up again and again until eventually my brain became impermeable to them new rather complicated words. Secondly and perhaps more disappointingly: the book has a pungent ammonia smell which gives those old tabloid newspapers a run for their money. Oxford University Press (the publisher) really does a disservice to this wonderful text which is a big shame.

Nonetheless this book remains a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the development of life. Just make sure that you have a couple of aspirins by your side when you read this book.

Thumbs up (5 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , ,
Categories: Book Reviews

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

New Community Resource: WIREs Developmental Biology

Posted by , on 1 March 2012

The Society for Developmental Biology (SDB) has partnered with Wiley-Blackwell to publish a new web-based encyclopedic resource for developmental biologists—WIREs Developmental Biology­.  This collection of invited peer-reviewed review articles encompasses the vast field of developmental biology with content chosen by an expert team of editors.  It is an online-only publication open to all for its first two years of publication and thereafter to subscribers and SDB members.

The Editors-in-Chief are three outstanding developmental biologists: John C. Gerhart (University of California, Berkeley), Gail R. Martin (University of California, San Francisco), and Eric F. Wieschaus (Princeton University).

In an announcement in the Winter 2012 issue of SDB e-news, Gerhart said, “WIREs Developmental Biology offers a dynamic and integrated approach to its encyclopedic coverage of the field exposing the interconnectivity of developmental processes.”  Describing the projects origins he said, “This venture grew from conversations held in the Society [SDB] well over a decade ago regarding the need for an authoritative discipline-encompassing publication” that was “updateable and interactive.”

WIREs articles can be browsed either by topic or issue. The WIREs model takes advantage of the web platform with embedded links within articles out to scientific databases and other relevant sites.  Additionally, under the “Resources” tab readers can find further reading, videos, and links to our companion learning resources at SDB CoRe (see Node article here).  As the field grows, content will continue to be expanded and existing articles updated.  There are also opportunities for community interaction through article comments.

Go ahead and dive into the content at WIREs Developmental Biology. Patterning, organogenesis, stem cells, and evolution are just a few of the topics.   A range of organisms are represented including plants, worms, frogs, flies, and even humans.  Take advantage of this new encyclopedic resource for your teaching needs and your own enrichment in the field of developmental biology.

Thumbs up (6 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Education, Resources

Wellcome Trust: Epigenomics of Common Diseases

Posted by , on 1 March 2012

Building on the success of last year’s event, ECD 2012, which will take palce on 12-15 October 2012, will bring together scientists from the fields of epigenomics, genetics and bioinformatics to discuss the latest developments in this fast-moving field. The meeting will discuss recent advances focusing on genome-wide approaches that are revolutionizing the field.

Scientific organising committee:
Stephan Beck, University College London, UK
Susan Clark, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Australia
Andy Feinberg, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
Anne Ferguson-Smith, University of Cambridge, UK

Venue: Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA

Date: 12-15 October 2012

https://registration.hinxton.wellcome.ac.uk/display_info.asp?id=298

Further information on this Wellcome Trust Scientific Conference, and a list of invited speakers, will be available soon. To be kept updated, please contact us at scientificconferences@hinxton.wellcome.ac.uk.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Events

This Month on the Node – February 2012

Posted by , on 29 February 2012

Even with an extra day, February is always over before you know it. Nevertheless, a lot of interesting content appeared on the Node in this short month. Have a look at some of these highlights:

Resources

Michael Barresi shared an educational approach he’s been using in the undergraduate developmental biology course he teaches:

“My students have been interacting with leading scientists in the field of developmental biology holding organized Q&A video conferences focused on current and seminal research articles. I am posting this to the Node as since I started using this pedagogical approach I have been recording these discussions, and with full consent provided, I have established an online repository of these recordings via my lab website.”

The videos are all on his site, and you can find out more in his post on the Node.

Earlier this month, Nishal Patel posted a list of freeware for scientists, highlighting several free tools that can be very useful in the lab, such as Dropbox for accessing files from different computers, Doodle for scheduling meeting, or OMERO for managing microscope images. See his full list here.

Research

Tracy Chong described her work on the hermaphroditic reproductive system of planarians, and the long journey the animals made from Sardinia to her final published BMC Developmental Biology paper.

Victoria Hatch discussed an interesting Nature paper that suggests a correlation between blood-borne factors and neurogenic decline in mice.

Erin Campbell’s monthly image feature this time focused on neuron precursor cell divisions and cerebral cortex development, from a recent Development paper.

Jobs and careers

Natascha Bushati interviewed Andrea Hutterer about her career in science management. She shares how it can be difficult to move from research to a career away from the bench:

“My scientific CV was good, but I had virtually no other relevant experience. Many employers appreciate even the smallest amount of experience more than a fantastic scientific CV, so what you really need when coming out of a PhD or postdoc is to get a foot in the door.”

If you’d rather stay in research, you’re in luck: a new postdoc position at Thomas Jefferson University was posted on the Node a few days ago. Remember, if you’re looking for a developmental biologist to join your lab, you can easily add your own job posting if you have a Node account. And if you’re looking for a job, you can subscribe to the job-specific RSS feed.

Meetings and courses

Some meetings and courses were announced on the Node front page (including the chick meeting that was rescheduled after last year’s earthquake in Japan), but as usual, keep an eye on the events calendar and see what’s coming up.

Once you’ve registered to attend a conference, take a look at these tips from the GSA to make sure you get the most out of it. And when you come back, you write about the meeting on the Node, like Katherine Brown did at the EuroSyStem conference in Slovenia.

Finally, at the end of last month, Ger Sabio wrote a detailed post about the International Course on Developmental Biology in Chile:

“For me, all of the faculty of the course were extremely good professors: Their lectures were very clear and they were all very open to questions or doubts and were very watchful and helpful in the lab. Eric [Wieschaus], however, was something else. I can’t actually explain how or why, but, as an example, he took it upon himself to single handedly sharpen most of our pincers to ease embryo peeling and larval dissection!”

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Highlights

Young Embryologist Meeting 2012 (YEM:2012)

Posted by , on 29 February 2012

 

4th Young Embryologist Meeting

Friday 1st June 2012

UCL Institute of Child Health, London

 

Registration and Abstract Submission NOW OPEN (until March 31st)

 

 

 

The 4th Young Embryologist Meeting (YEM:2012) will take place on the 1st of June 2012 in the Kennedy Lecture Theatre at UCL’s Institute of Child Health, London. It will be a full day event from 10am to 5pm.

 

At the annual YEM, we aim to facilitate the discussion of various topics of developmental biology in a relaxed and cordial atmosphere. YEM:2012 is free and open to everyone, though preference is given to PhD students and post-docs for talks and posters. This year, we are pleased to welcome Professor Liz Robertson (Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford) as our keynote speaker. We will also have a Q&A Session about publishing, with Katherine Brown (Executive Editor of Development), Katie Ridd (Senior Editor of Nature Communications), and David Wilkinson (Editor in Chief of Mechanisms of Development) as panel members.

 

Registration and abstract submission close on 31st March 2012. To find out more about the meeting, to register, or to submit an abstract for a talk or poster, please visit the Young Embryologist Network website:

 

www.youngembryologist.org

 

 

If you would like to get more out of your research and meet your fellow researchers, join the YEN! Sign up to our mailing list for updates on future events by emailing: youngembryologistnetwork@gmail.com

Join the YEN Facebook group or follow YEN on Twitter @YEN_Tweets

 

 

.

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Events

Science Funding Shake-up in Japan

Posted by , on 29 February 2012

In these times of financial instability and prudence, researchers across the globe seem to be finding things tough. Here in Japan fiscal worries are abundant, particularly following the disastrous earthquake and tsunami of 2011. Government debt is spiralling and tax rises seem imminent, but what consequence will this all have on research funding?
It seems the axe may be about to fall; in what amounts to a cost-cutting exercise, government advisors have recommended the amalgamation of the 5 main science-funding bodies. These include the prestigious RIKEN organisation, which has a diverse portfolio of research institutes, including several covering the life-sciences, such the Center for Developmental Biology (CDB) in Kobe. RIKEN president Ryoji Noyori has informed research staff that the organisation would continue in its attempts to develop into a world-class research institution, but hinted at a new focus on “needs-based” science. It seems likely that basic science research may take a hit, although the plans won’t come into effect until 2014.
In a related development, public sector workers across Japan may soon see pay cuts of up to 7.8% for the next 2 years; money directly earmarked for tsunami-related reconstruction projects. These cuts could also affect researchers working in publicly funded institutions.

It all sounds a bit bleak, but there are still excellent opportunities for researchers to work in Japan:

RIKEN CDB is on the lookout for aspiring PIs.

For Postdocs interested in joining a lab at a RIKEN institute, the Foreign Postdoctoral Fellowship is a great source of funding.

JSPS also offers attractive (tax free) fellowships for long and short-term stays.

Thumbs up (3 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Funding

Managing Mouse Colonies: Genetics, Breeding & Welfare

Posted by , on 28 February 2012

Summary
This popular course is a collaboration between MRC Harwell, the Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, the RSPCA Transgenic Training Working Group (TTWG) and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. It aims to introduce experienced technicians and scientific staff involved with the management of GM mouse colonies to best practice with respect to the 3Rs and animal welfare. The programme covers historical and current best practice in the maintenance of GM mouse colonies for scientific research and the differing disciplines involved in production, phenotyping and archiving.

Please Note: To optimise discussion and interaction between participants and trainers, places on this course are limited and selection will be based upon information provided. An application form must be included as part of the registration process. Please see below for full details.

Programme
Topics covered will include:
– Nomenclature
– Basic colony management
– Maintaining transgenic and gene-targeted lines
– Breeding for experimental purposes
– Maintenance of high health status colonies

All of these will be presented with particular attention to the 3Rs and animal welfare.

The course will start at 10:30 on Wednesday 6 June and finish at 16:30 on Friday 8 June 2012.

Scientific organisers
James Bussell Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK
Neil Dear Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, UK
Nikki Osborne RSPCA, UK
Sara Wells Medical Research Council, Harwell, UK

Keynote speakers
Karen Steel Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK
Ian Jackson Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, UK

Confirmed tutors
James Bussell Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK
Neil Dear Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, UK
Adrian Deeny University College London, UK
Martin Fray Medical Research Council, Harwell, UK
Richard Houghton Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK
Nikki Osborne RSPCA, UK
Ian Rosewell, Cancer Research UK
Sara Wells Medical Research Council, Harwell, UK
Jacqui White Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK
Ben Woodman Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, UK

For more information, see https://registration.hinxton.wellcome.ac.uk/display_info.asp?id=287

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Events

GSA conference tips

Posted by , on 28 February 2012

The Genetics Society of America has published a very useful list of tips for first time conference attendees, called “How to Get the Most Out of a Conference“. It’s written with GSA conferences in mind, but it’s applicable to most big meetings, and useful for returning attendees as well! Reposted with permission. Original list on the GSA site.

 

How to Get the Most Out of a Conference:
Tips for First-Time Attendees

Before the Meeting

Plan ahead: Look through the Program Book or the schedule of events online to determine which sessions you are interested in based on the topic, speaker, and format. If the conference has an online itinerary planner, take advantage of it to search abstracts, save sessions you are interested in, and print out an agenda for yourself. If full abstracts are only available online, think about printing those that you might want a hard copy of while at the conference.

Set your goals: Many conferences can seem overwhelmingly busy. If you’re wondering how to navigate the many sessions, consider focusing on a few topics that interest you instead of trying to hear everything. Remember to schedule some time in between sessions for talking to speakers or even just the person sitting next to you. If you are seeking a postdoctoral position or other employment, be sure to bring a few copies of your CV with you.

Networking: Ask your advisor which researchers you should meet and who might be interested in your work.

Prepare short introductions of yourself, your research, and your plans for the future. It’s helpful to have both a 10-second and a 30-second introduction, so you’ll be prepared when you bump into the right person on the elevator or at a reception.

Business cards: Bring a big stack of business cards. You never want to have to scribble your name on a scrap at paper for your next collaborator or mentor. If you don’t already have then, you can order from an office supply store or print them yourself with card stock designed for this purpose. Be sure to include at least your name, contact information, and school/institution—and possibly a one-line description of your research topic or professional interest.

At the Meeting

Attend sessions and trainee events: Use your planned agenda as a guide, but don’t be afraid to try something new. Attend a talk that is in not your own field or check out posters you may know nothing about. You may discover new ideas or collaborators where you least expect them.

Networking: When you are not attending sessions, don’t miss the opportunity to catch up with your colleagues and meet new people. Don’t be afraid to talk to strangers. Arrive a little early at sessions and sit next to someone you don’t know and introduce yourself. People love to talk about their work, so asking them what they do is a great conversation starter. If you’d like to know this person better, give him/her your business card. Also, collect cards from those you meet and follow up with them later in the meeting or after you’re home. A good place to keep business cards is in your badge holder. If you have promised to send them something after the meeting, make a note of it on their card and remember to do so.

After the Meeting

Take time to reflect: Did you meet your goals? It is helpful to write a summary of your experience for your personal records. You can include descriptions of sessions that interested you, ideas that came up, and who you met.

Complete the Survey: Most meeting planners will email an end-of-conference survey; your feedback is the best tool that conference organizers have to make improvements for the future. If there’s something you especially liked or wish had been different, let them know. If you get an e-mail with a link to a post-conference survey, please respond promptly.

Follow up: Send a follow-up email as soon as possible after the conference to anyone with whom you would like to stay in contact. If there were sessions that interested you and that you missed, contact the speakers by e-mail and request copies of their slides.

Thumbs up (3 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Events, Resources

A planarian’s journey from Sardinia to the Midwest

Posted by , on 22 February 2012

In 1999, twenty-nine planarians, courtesy of Dr. Maria Pala made the journey across the Atlantic from the beautiful mediterranean island of Sardinia, to Baltimore, Maryland, into the hands of my advisor, Phil Newmark, who was then a post-doctoral fellow in Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado’s laboratory at the Carnegie Institution of Washington.

Realizing the potential of the flatworms he held in his hands, he took advantage of their power of regeneration and cut them into many pieces, each of which grew into a whole new animal. In this way, he generated clonal lines of the sexual strain of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. These animals are simultaneous hermaphrodites- meaning that they have functional male and female reproductive organs; unlike C. elegans, they are not self-fertile and must mate to propagate. Inbred lines were derived in the Sánchez Alvarado lab from one of the clones and used for sequencing the S. mediterranea genome.

When I joined the Newmark lab at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, I was fascinated by the developmental plasticity of these planarians. Due to a population of stem cells called neoblasts, they can grow and degrow, and their reproductive system can regress and regrow depending on environmental factors. Even more amazing, these flatworms could regenerate their whole reproductive system, including the germ line, from fragments that were initially devoid of reproductive tissue. Understanding the mechanisms that the planarians use to achieve this feat is one of the main themes of research in the Newmark Lab.

Interestingly, there is a strain of S. mediterranea that reproduces asexually by transverse fission. The existence of two divergent modes of reproduction in a single species presents a unique opportunity to identify conserved and species-specific genes that are important for germ cell development and reproductive system maturation.

Together with my colleagues, Yuying Wang and Joel Stary, we performed microarray analyses to identify genes that are expressed differentially between the asexual and sexual planarians; we then used in situ hybridization to examine the cell types in which these genes were expressed. To complement this transcriptomic approach, we also identified several antibodies and fluorescent lectin-conjugates that labeled components of the planarian reproductive system.

This work, as presented in our BMC Developmental Biology paper, provides markers and tools to further characterize the hermaphroditic reproductive system of S. mediterranea. I was thrilled to see that there were genes specific to either male or female components of the reproductive system, suggesting sex-specific mechanisms in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. I am very excited to unravel the mystery of how these hermaphroditic worms are able to develop both male and female parts. With their genome now experimentally accessible, little did the twenty-nine planarians know how they would contribute to science when they made their journey across the Atlantic 13 years ago.

Thumbs up (11 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Research

In Development this week (Vol. 139, Issue 6)

Posted by , on 21 February 2012

Here are the research highlights from the current issue of Development:

Neural circuit building

During development, sensory neurons form neural circuits with motoneurons. Although the anatomical details of these circuits are well described, less is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying their formation. To investigate the involvement of motoneurons in sensory neuron development, Hirohide Takebayashi and colleagues analyse sensory neuron phenotypes in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of Olig2 knockout mouse embryos, which lack motoneurons (see p. 1125). These embryos, they report, also have reduced numbers of sensory neurons but increased numbers of apoptotic cells in the DRG. In addition, the axonal projections of the sensory neurons in these embryos are abnormal. Because neurotrophin 3 (Ntf3) and its receptors are strongly expressed in motoneurons and sensory neurons, respectively, the researchers also investigate whether Ntf3 is one of the motoneuron-derived factors that regulate sensory neuron development. Notably, the sensory neuron phenotypes in Ntf3 conditional knockout embryos resemble those observed in Olig2 knockout embryos. Thus, the researchers propose, motoneuron-derived Ntf3 is a pre-target neurotrophin that is essential for survival and axonal projection of sensory neurons.

SIK3 bones up on chondrocyte hypertrophy

Most vertebrate bones develop through endochondral ossification. During this process, proliferating chondrocytes form a cartilage scaffold, differentiate into hypertrophic chondrocytes and die. The cartilage scaffold is then degraded and replaced by bone. Chondrocyte hypertrophy is, therefore, crucial for endochondral ossification. On p. 1153, Noriyuki Tsumaki and colleagues identify salt-inducible kinase 3 (SIK3) as an essential factor for chondrocyte hypertrophy in mice. SIK3-deficient mice, the researchers report, exhibit dwarfism, bone malformation and accumulation of chondrocytes in various bones. These phenotypes, they suggest, are due to impaired chondrocyte hypertrophy. Consistent with this suggestion, SIK3 is expressed in prehypertrophic and hypertrophic chondrocytes in the embryonic bones and postnatal growth plates of wild-type mice. Other experiments show that SIK3 anchors histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) in the cytoplasm, thereby releasing MEF2C, a transcription factor that facilitates chondrocyte hypertrophy, from suppression by HDAC4 in the nucleus. These results suggest that the regulation of HDAC4 by SIK3 is important for the progression of chondrocyte hypertrophy during skeletal development.

PRMT5 and stem cell function

Stem cells are essential for growth, development, gamete production and tissue homeostasis but what regulates their maintenance and function in vivo? On p. 1083, Phillip Newmark and colleagues report that the conserved protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 promotes stem cell function in planarian flatworms. These organisms contain a population of adult stem cells called neoblasts that can regenerate all the worm’s tissues. Neoblasts characteristically contain chromatoid bodies, large cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules similar to structures that are present in the germline of many organisms. The researchers show that, like germline RNP granules, chromatoid bodies contain proteins bearing symmetrical dimethylarginine (sDMA) modifications, probably including the PIWI family member SMEDWI-3. PRMT5 is responsible for sDMA modification of these proteins, they report, and PRMT5 depletion results in fewer chromatoid bodies, fewer neoblasts, and defects in regeneration, growth and homeostasis. Together, these results identify new chromatoid body components that are involved in neoblast function and add to the evidence that suggests that sDMA modification of proteins stabilises RNP granules.

BR(in)G1 on male meiosis

Mammalian germ cell development and gametogenesis involve several genome-wide changes in epigenetic modifications and chromatin structure. Here (p. 1133), Terry Magnuson and co-workers explore the role of the mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex during spermatogenesis in mice. The researchers report that levels of the SWI/SNF catalytic subunit brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1) peak during the early stages of meiosis. Consistent with this expression pattern, germline ablation of Brg1 produces germ cells that arrest during prophase 1, the stage of meiosis during which the induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks generates recombination between homologous chromosomes. In line with the timing of their meiotic arrest, BRG1-depleted spermatocytes accumulate unrepaired DNA and fail to complete synapsis. They also exhibit global alterations to histone modifications and chromatin structure, including alterations that are associated with DNA damage and heterochromatin. The researchers propose, therefore, that BRG1 has an essential role in spermatogenesis and that BRG1-containing complexes function in the programmed recombination and repair events that occur during meiosis.

Binary route to (non)-neural competence

During gastrulation, neural crest and cranial placodes originate at the neural plate border and from an adjacent territory, respectively. But do these ectodermal tissues arise from a common precursor or from neural and non-neural ectoderm (the binary competence model)? On p. 1175, Gerhard Schlosser and colleagues use tissue grafting in Xenopus embryos to tackle this controversy. They show that, at neural plate stages, competence for induction of neural plate, border and crest markers is restricted to neural ectoderm, whereas competence for induction of panplacodal markers is confined to non-neural ectoderm. The homeobox protein Dlx3 and the transcription factor GATA2 are both required cell-autonomously for panplacodal and epidermal marker expression in non-neural ectoderm, they report. Moreover, the ectopic expression of Dlx3 (but not GATA2) in the neural plate is sufficient to induce non-neural markers, whereas the overexpression of Dlx3 or GATA2 suppresses neural plate, border and crest markers in the neural plate. Together, these results support the binary competence model and implicate Dlx3 in the regulation of non-neural competence.

Morphogen-based simulation of fin development

One of the greatest challenges in developmental biology is to understand how shape and size are controlled during development. Interactions between growth and pattern formation mechanisms are key drivers of morphogenesis but are difficult to study experimentally because of the highly dynamic nature of development in space and time. Here (p. 1188), Anne-Gaëlle Rolland-Lagan and co-workers use simulation modelling to explore how mobile signals, such as morphogens, might coordinate growth and patterning during zebrafish caudal fin development and regeneration. The zebrafish fin comprises 16 to 18 bony rays, each of which contains multiple joints along its proximodistal axis that give rise to segments. The researchers propose a model in which the interaction of three postulated morphogens can account for the available experimental data on fin growth and joint patterning and for the regeneration of a properly shaped fin following amputation. This simple, plausible model provides a theoretical framework that could guide future searches for the molecular regulators of fin growth and regeneration.

Plus…

CTCF: insights into insulator function during development

The nuclear protein CTCF when bound to insulator sequences can prevent undesirable crosstalk between genomic regions and can shield genes from enhancer function. Here, Rainer Renkawitz and colleagues discuss the mechanisms underlying developmentally regulated CTCFdependent transcription. See the Primer on p. 1045

The hypoblast (visceral endoderm): an evo-devo perspective

Claudio Stern and Karen Downs discuss the function and evolution of the chick hypoblast and the visceral endoderm in mouse, highlighting the common roles played by these tissues. See the Review on p. 1059

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Research