The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

Zebrafish Research Technician – University College London

Posted by , on 3 August 2015

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

Our group works on modelling inherited and acquired haematopoietic diseases using the zebrafish. Our goal is to generate relevant models to study the genetics of these disorders and perform chemical screens to identify novel therapeutic targets for haematological cancers and pre-cancerous conditions. The current post is funded by Children with Cancer and will focus on developing and validating new models of childhood inherited leukaemias.

We are looking for a self-motivated applicant with an interest in developmental biology, cancer genetics or haematopoiesis.  Skills in common molecular biology techniques and prior experience with zebrafish would be beneficial.

The post is funded for 1 year in the first instance

Please contact Elspeth Payne – e.payne@ucl.ac.uk for informal enquiries

https://atsv7.wcn.co.uk/search_engine/jobs.cgi?SID=amNvZGU9MTQ3OTc2OSZ2dF90ZW1wbGF0ZT05NjUmb3duZXI9NTA0MTE3OCZvd25lcnR5cGU9ZmFpciZicmFuZF9pZD0wJnZhY2Zpcm0udmFjdGl0bGU9dGVjaG5pY2lhbiZwb3N0aW5nX2NvZGU9MjI0JnJlcXNpZz0xNDM4NTk5NzUxLTgxYzRiYzgzNTUwOTI3YTRjZGVjNWIwNjhkYzJhYjIzZGEzNjA4YmU=

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

The importance of indifference in scientific research

Posted by , on 3 August 2015

This essay by Martin Schwartz was originally published in the Journal of Cell Science.

 

Current issues regarding scientific ethics have focused for the most part on regulations governing research and publication. I suggest that the internal process by which we separate self interest from the scientific process is a crucial and neglected part of training. Consideration of these issues might help us train better scientists instead of just scientists who adhere to the rules.

This is a follow-up to the essay ‘The importance of stupidity in scientific research’ by Martin A. Schwartz (J. Cell Sci. 121, 1771).

 

There has been a good deal of public discussion recently about scientific ethics and data reproducibility. As is usually the case in these matters, much attention has been focused on devising regulations or procedures for preventing fraud and ensuring that experimental results can be reproduced. But I believe that something central is missing from this discussion: the internal process by which scientists get the right answers and communicate them to our colleagues. One might get the impression from the public pronouncements and proliferation of mandatory courses in scientific ethics that ethical behavior is primarily a matter of adhering to a set of standards. ‘Thou shalt not Photoshop thy figures.’ I want to suggest that regulations are a response to a breakdown in something deeper, and, further, that they are a poor substitute. Let me explain.

Scientific research is a juggernaut that seems to roll powerfully and inevitably forward, and yet, the process is oddly fragile. Once we have a reasonably accurate picture of how things work, the testing and validation can proceed in a well-organized, efficient manner. But in the early stages, when we really don’t understand the system and the possibilities seem endless, it is easy to go astray. Is that 1.5-fold change meaningful? Maybe if conditions are optimized it will become a 5-fold change. Or maybe it’s just a blip and doesn’t mean a thing. The question often becomes how much effort should we expend on working out the bugs and obtaining a robust result. I have been fooled by a nice result that happened twice but then stopped; only after spending a long time trying to repeat it, and then exploring the system using other approaches, did I realize that it was not correct. I have also gotten results that looked nice once or twice and then stopped working, but after extensive optimization turned out to be correct and important. I have had a weak, hard to reproduce result that I abandoned, only to see it published a few years later in a very nice paper from another lab. In short, there are false positives and false negatives. Nor does statistical analysis solve the essential problem. No result is statistically significant at the start. The statistical analysis comes later, after the system has been optimized and the experiment repeated a number of times. In the early stages of a project when the picture is just emerging, it’s hard to know.

At this early stage in a project, intuition is a major factor. When you really know your system, sometimes a preliminary result just feels right. Or being right makes so much sense that you are willing to follow a feeble lead. But a major confounding variable in this process is the human tendency to want our hypotheses to be correct. If my hypothesis is correct, it means I’m smart, I’m close to writing the paper, and then I have a good shot at landing the job or getting tenure. Our desire to be correct makes it harder to actually be correct.

Every project contains myriad decisions about how to proceed, which are often very delicate. When I see a small effect that is exactly what I hoped for, but the second and third experiments show nothing, do I try again with a different calcium concentration or give it up? When the data goes in the right direction but has a feature that doesn’t quite fit, do I ignore the small discrepancy or explore further to see where it leads? Every project has discrepancies, you can’t follow every one or you will never publish. But some of them are crucial; if you ignore them you will miss something big. The way we make these choices accounts for a significant part of what distinguishes the good scientists from the great ones.

There is a state of mind that facilitates clear thinking; in the title, I jokingly called it disinterest. To be more accurate, I might have called it ‘passionate disinterest’. Buddhists call it non-attachment. We all have hopes, desires and ambitions. Non-attachment means acknowledging them, accepting them, and then not inserting them into a process that at some level has nothing to do with you. Yes, this is a peculiar, even paradoxical idea. Your own discoveries have nothing to do with you? How can that be?

Science occupies a kind of middle ground between two opposite forms of exploration. The arts explore, in free form manner, every aspect of individual, subjective human experience. We might, as an audience, share in it but we each do so in our own individual, subjective way, and to the extent that it touches on our own lives. At the opposite pole, mathematics elucidates a kind of universal language that is true for all time in all places, independent of its creators. Science lies in between. Scientists aim to discover universal laws yet do so through subjective experiences that we call experiments. The paradox originates in the way in which science stands with a foot in two different worlds, between subjective and objective. (It is also, incidentally, the source of the paradoxes in quantum mechanics and relativity.) We might think of an experiment as a conversation with nature, where we ask a question and listen for an answer, then interpret the answer. This process is personal in that the questions come from us. But by listening for an answer that comes from nature, there is also a way in which it connects to something vastly larger than we are; something that might even be universal.

Non-attachment means appreciating the bigger-than-we-are aspect. The reward of doing so is that we have a better chance of getting it right. In which case, we help build something that will long outlive us and that has the potential to grow in ways that we cannot currently even imagine. Making non-attachment a central part of science education would beat the hell out of ethics classes and regulations about the use of Photoshop in preparing figures.

Thumbs up (23 votes)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Discussion, Education

This month on the Node- July 2015

Posted by , on 1 August 2015

July was a really exciting month on the Node, as we launched our brand new look and celebrated our 5th anniversary! Here are some of the highlights:

 

Happy birthday to the Node:

Node cakeThe Node’s birthday gift to itself was a brand new look and logo. Check out our first post of the month for a short explanation on what has changed and why. To mark our 5th birthday, we looked through our archive to find the most popular posts in the last 5 years. We also thought this would a good opportunity to thank all the people who make the Node happen, include some of our most prolific writers. Thank you as well to all of you who came to our stand at the SDB meeting and celebrated the Node’s birthday with drinks and cake!

 

Discussion:

– To what extent should we be interdisciplinary? Share your thoughts with the latest question of the month!

– Nestor attended the imaging and quantitative biology workshop at the recent SDB meeting and brought the discussion to the Node. What problems do you commonly encounter? This workshop also highlighted the need for a place where all online imaging resources could be listed. Let us know which of these (and other!) useful resources should be included in our new resources section!

– How important is it to take risks in science?

– And in a candid post, Thomas writes about the differing career prospects for men and women in science. Have your say in the comments section!

 

Meeting reports:

Woods Hole square 1– Nambirajan was the winner of the Node/Abcam competition to be the official reporter at the Abcam Adult Neurogenesis conference. Here is his meeting report.

– When physics meets genetics meets philosophy… Alan Love posted about a recent workshop and shared the reading list around which it was organised.

– And don’t miss the two reports from this year’s Woods Hole embryology course: part 1 gives a general overview of the first weeks of the course, while part 2 describes a day in the hectic life of a student in the course!

 

 

Austin Smith squareAlso on the Node:

– This month we featured two new interviews. We interviewed stem cell and developmental biologist Austin Smith, and mouse embryologist Brigid Hogan.

– Setting up a new lab? How do you choose new lab members? Advice in the latest Mole cartoon!

– And don’t forget to check our new jobs page– several new positions were advertised this month!

 

Happy Reading!

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Highlights

Postdoc Position C. elegans Cell Biology

Posted by , on 31 July 2015

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

A postdoctoral scientist position is available in the Bembenek Lab at UT Knoxville. Our research group is studying cell division using C. elegans as a model organism. Our lab is seeks to understand how key cell cycle regulators such as separase control membrane trafficking during cytokinesis. We are also interested in how cells regulate abscission and newly emerging functions of the midbody during development using advanced microscopy techniques like lattice light sheet imaging (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6208/1257998.abstract). An ideal candidate will have training in genetics, microscopy and cell biology. Our lab houses a dedicated spinning disk confocal microscope for our live cell imaging work. We also use biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology techniques to explore how mechanisms of cell division operate in a developmental context. The University of Tennessee also provides opportunities for candidates to obtain teaching experience at a large state university. Interested candidates can send a letter of interest, CV and references to Dr. Joshua Bembenek at bembenek@utk.edu.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Academic worker with a background in bio-informatics

Posted by , on 30 July 2015

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

For Stemphys, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,  University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Background: 
StemPhys is a new interdisciplinary initiative joining forces of physics and stem cell biology with the goal of advancing our knowledge of stem cell commitment and controlling the differentiation process. Six core groups at the University of Copenhagen constitute StemPhys, three in stem cell and developmental biology from DanStem, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences and three groups covering both theoretical and experimental physics, from the Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science. StemPhys is financed by the Danish National Research Foundation for a period of 6 years and commenced on April 1st 2015. Details can be found at: www.stemphys.ku.dk 

Two of the research groups at Danstem are jointly recruiting a talented and motivated academic worker with a background in bio-informatics. This candidate will be involved in the construction of a transcriptomic and proteomic database for the Brickman and Grapin-Botton laboratories, the mapping of RNA and ChIP Seq, analysis of single cell gene expression, the development of meta-analysis and improvement of our existing bio-infomatics pipelines.

Job Description:
The academic worker will support researchers in both the Brickman and Grapin-Botton laboratories who need assistances with the analysis of bio-informatic datasets. The successful candidate will also devise systems for data storage and assist with meta-analysis of existing datasets. As the StemPhys projects develop the resources for single cell sequencing, the applicant will develop pipelines for the analysis of these datasets.

For additional information about the above position please contact Professor Joshua Brickman:  joshua.brickman@sund.ku.dk

Qualifications: 
• A relevant academic background at master level within bio-informatics or other relevant degree is required.
• Solid and documented work experience from high quality academic and/or industrial laboratories is required. The ability to efficiently work as part of a team is essential.
• Previous experience in molecular biology
• Computer proficiency (Word, Excel) and experience with programming, and in particular R (Bioconductor).
• Considering that the Center is a highly international research environment, solid English communication skills, both oral and written is required.
• Ability to independently organize your work is requested.
• Integrity, enthusiasm, motivation, flexibility, confidence and good collaboration skills.

Terms of salary, work and employment:
The employment is scheduled to start October 1st 2015 or upon agreement with the chosen candidates. The employment is initially for 2 years.
The place of work is at Danstem, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen.
Salary, pension and terms of employment are in accordance with the provisions of the collective agreement between the Danish Government and AC (the Danish Confederation of Professional Associations). In addition to the basic salary a monthly contribution to a pension fund is added (17.1% of the salary).

The application must include:
• A motivated application letter
• Curriculum vitae
• Diplomas – all relevant certificates

The application must be submitted in English.

The University of Copenhagen wish to reflect the diversity of society and encourage all qualified candidates to apply regardless of personal background.

Foreign applicants may find the following links useful: www.ism.ku.dk (International Staff Mobility) and www.workingconditions.ku.dk.

Application deadline: 23.59 pm, August 22nd 2015.
• Only applications received in time and consisting of the above listed documents will be considered.
• Applications and/or any material received after deadline will not be taken into consideration.

Your application must be submitted electronically by clicking ‘APPLY NOW’ below or via this advertisement found on http://employment.ku.dk/.

Application can be found at the follow link

http://danstem.ku.dk/join/jobs/academic-worker-with-a-background-in-bio-informatics/

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

PhD scholarship in ‘Gene Regulatory Networks; deciphering conflicting role in lineage specification and embryonic stem cell pluripotency’

Posted by , on 30 July 2015

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

A PhD scholarship investigating the “the role of lineage specifiers in regulating pluripotency” is offered by the Brickman Lab with in Danish Stem Cell Centre (DanStem) as part of StemPhys.

StemPhys is a new interdisciplinary initiative joining forces of physics and stem cell biology with the goal of advancing our knowledge of stem cell commitment and controlling the differentiation process. Six core groups at the University of Copenhagen constitute StemPhys, three in stem cell and developmental biology from DanStem, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences and three groups covering both theoretical and experimental physics, from the Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science. StemPhys is financed by the Danish National Research Foundation for a period of 6 years and commenced on April 1st 2015. Details can be found at www.stemphys.ku.dk

DanStem is an international center with in the faculty of Health and Medical Sciences focused on stem cell biology. It was founded three years ago based on a grant from the Novo Nordic Foundation that enabled the recruitment of leading laboratories from abroad to Denmark and bringing them together with some of international leaders already in Denmark. DanStem is the world biggest concentration of groups working on stem cells associated with visceral organ development and homeostasis. It is also rapidly becoming an international center for the study of gene regulation in differentiation and disease. DanStem is currently made up of nine research groups, five of whom were recruited from outside Denmark. Any student hired under this project would be enrolled into DanStem’s PhD program.

The PhD studentship will be based with in the Brickman laboratory and will follow up on their observations about the relevance of lineage priming and ESC heterogeneity in early differentiation.

Project description:
Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs) are genetically normal, immortal cell lines with the capacity to become any cell type in the future organism. This project will explore the role of signaling and transcription factor networks known to regulate the self-renewal of ESCs in early embryonic differentiation. Can a pluripotent state be explained by simplifying blocking signaling? This project will follow up our recent observations that pluripotency is supported, in part, by inhibiting primitive endoderm differentiation via the Erk pathway (Brickman and Hamilton, Cell Reports 2014). We will now extend this studies to explore signaling downstream of other early embryonic pathways, Gsk3beta, Notch and LIF. We will explore the consequence of signal strength and duration for both differentiation and the maintenance of ESCs. We will characterize the emergent gene regulatory network downstream of each of these pathways using inducible systems and identifying the functional differences between the extent of signaling that supports lineage priming with in the ESC state and signaling known to promote differentiation. Finally, this project will test the hypothesis that this network is conserved in species with extensive extra-embryonic development and identify the conserved members of the ESC pluripotency network that are exploited by other more primitive species of embryos with basal positions in vertebrate evolution.

Qualifications:
• Candidates are required to have a master’s degree in biology, biochemistry, medicine or human biology, or similar, and a general understanding of developmental and/or stem cell biology.
• Strong motivation and very good scientific skills are essential.
• Publications and practical experience are considered an advantage.
• Good communication skills, both oral and written.

Employment Conditions: 
The successful candidate will be offered a full-time PhD Research Position in the Danstem PhD Training Scheme that upon successful completion of formal PhD study culminates in the award of a PhD. Employment as a PhD student is conditioned upon a positive assessment of the candidate´s research performance and enrollment in the Graduate School at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences. The PhD study must be completed in accordance with the ministerial orders from the Ministry of Education on the PhD degree and the University´s rules on achieving the degree. Salary, pension and terms of employment are in accordance with the provisions of the collective agreement between the Danish Government and AC (the Danish Confederation of Professional Associations). In addition to the basic salary a monthly contribution to a pension fund is added (17.1% of the salary).

Questions:
For further information contact Professor Joshua Brickman by e-mail to joshua.brickman@sund.ku.dk
Foreign applicants may find the following links useful: www.ism.ku.dk (International Staff Mobility) and www.workingconditions.ku.dk.

Application:
The application must be submitted in English, by clicking on “Apply online” below, and must include the following:

• Application detailing the basis on which the applicant wishes his or her scientific, teaching and other qualifications to be assessed
• Curriculum vitae
• Diplomas – all relevant certificates
• Other information for consideration, e.g. list of publications (if any), letters of recommendation

The application will be assessed according to the Ministerial Order no. 284 of 25 April 2008 on the Appointment of Academic Staff at Universities.

Application procedure:
After the expiry of the deadline for applications, the authorized recruitment manager selects applicants for assessment on the advice of the Appointments Committee. All applicants are then immediately notified whether their application has been passed for assessment by an expert assessment committee. Selected applicants are notified of the composition of the committee and each applicant has the opportunity to comment on the part of the assessment that relates to the applicant him/herself. You can read about the recruitment process at http://employment.ku.dk

The University of Copenhagen encourages all interested in this post to apply.

Please submit the application with the required attachments. Only online applications will be accepted. The closing date for applications is 23.59pm, August 22nd 2015.

Application link can be found at

 

 

http://danstem.ku.dk/join/jobs/phd-scholarship-in-human-stem-cell-biology/

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Wellcome-Trust Funded Independent Senior Research Fellows in Quantitative Biomedicine at Warwick

Posted by , on 29 July 2015

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

Wellcome-Trust Funded Independent Senior Research Fellows in Quantitative Biomedicine.

A unique opportunity to launch an independent research career.

The University of Warwick has initiated a Wellcome-Trust funded research programme in “Quantitative Biomedicine” to bridge physical / mathematical sciences and biomedicine. The programme is of a cross-campus nature with strong participation from the Division of Biomedical Cell Biology and the Warwick Systems Biology Centre

We are seeking early career researchers who are no more than 4 years from obtaining a Doctoral degree with the potential to lead a strong independent research programme. The candidates will be selected based on their track record in innovative research and on the strength of the research proposal. Importantly, the proposal should make clear how the project benefits from quantitative methodologies. The proposed research programme should bring together physical and mathematical sciences (including but not restricted to computer science, physics, mathematics, statistics, chemistry, and engineering) and biomedical sciences (including, but not restricted to cell and developmental biology, neurobiology, immunology, microbiology and infection). Successful candidates will be provided salary, laboratory space, running costs and technical support for three years. The identified candidates will be expected to win externally funded fellowships within the contract period and will be mentored in preparing such applications.

Interested candidates should submit their CV, a two-page research proposal, and the names and addresses of three referees who are able to comment on the candidates past research work as well as the readiness of the candidate to embark on an independent career in research.

https://atsv7.wcn.co.uk/search_engine/jobs.cgi?owner=5062452&ownertype=fair&jcode=1475114&vt_template=1457&adminview=1

Informal enquires can be directed to

Mohan Balasubramanian, E-mail: m.k.balasubramanian@warwick.ac.uk

or Karuna Sampath (email: K.Sampath@warwick.ac.uk)

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Question of the month- interdisciplinary research

Posted by , on 29 July 2015

Developmental biology is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary, as biologists team up with physicists and mathematicians to address new and classical problems in the field from a new perspective. But should we all be pursuing such an approach or is there still room for ‘pure’ developmental biology approaches? Should we incorporate more physics/mathematics modules in the training of young scientists to facilitate interactions? And is it enough to collaborate with researchers outside your field on specific projects or should labs include mathematicians and physicists working alongside biologists? This month we are asking:

 

To what extent should we be interdisciplinary?

 

Share your thoughts by leaving a comment below! You can comment anonymously if you prefer. We are also collating answers on social media via this Storify. And if you have any ideas for future questions please drop us an email!

 

Thumbs up (3 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , ,
Categories: Discussion

From our sister journals- July 2015

Posted by , on 28 July 2015

Here is some developmental biology related content from other journals published by The Company of Biologists.

 

dmmlogo

 

 

 

Drosophila helps to elucidate the effects of radiation therapy

DMM019786.jpgChildren who are exposed to cranial radiation therapy (CRT) to treat brain tumours are at increased risk later in life for neurocognitive, motor and seizure disorders. Current radioprotective agents are difficult to administer and have severe side effects. Thus, Barry Ganetzky and colleagues used Drosophila to model and elucidate the toxic effects of CRT during juvenile development. First, they found that irradiating fly larvae with different doses of radiation reduces the percentage of animals that survive to adulthood and impairs motor activity of surviving adults, in a dose-dependent manner. These phenotypes are paralleled by an increased expression of activated death caspase-1, a cell death marker, in adult brains. Then, using flies at different developmental stages, they found that the toxic effects of radiation exposure become more severe with decreasing larval age at time of irradiation. Notably, flies with different genetic backgrounds show different sensitivity to radiation. Thus, Drosophila represents a useful system to model CRT-induced toxicity and to dissect key molecular and genetic pathways. These, in turn, might illuminate potential targets for radioprotective purposes. Read the paper here  (Open Access).

 

 

JCS

 

 

 

 

Of oocytes and PDKs

JCS167049F6Perturbations in energy metabolism cause meiotic defects in mammalian oocytes. It has been suggested that these may be exerted through pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases (PDKs) that act on the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH), which, in somatic cells, is inhibited by phosphorylation of its catalytic subunit PDHE1α at serine residues S232, S292 and S300; however, the role of particular PDKs in the maturation of meiotic oocytes is still unclear. Qiang Wang and colleagues, therefore, examined the individual contributions of known mammalian PDKs to the regulation of murine oocyte maturation. They found that oocytes that overexpress PDK3 have elevated levels of PDHE1α phosphorylated at S293, defects in polar body 1 (Pb1) extrusion, as well as a disorganised spindle and misaligned chromosomes. Moreover, in keeping with a central role of PDH in energy production, the authors also found decreased levels of ATP. These spindle and chromosome abnormalities, as well as metabolic defects could be rescued with a phosphorylation resistant PDH-S293A mutant. By contrast, knockdown of PDK1 or PDK2, both of which phosphorylate S232, caused defects in Pb1 extrusion, spindle assembly and chromosome alignment, but did not affect the level of total ATP. Taken together, these results reveal that PDK3-dependent phosphorylation of PDHE1α at S293 affects oocyte maturation through PDH inhibition and changes in metabolism, whereas PDK1/PDK2-mediated PDHE1α phosphorylation at S232 has effects on oocyte meiosis that may be independent of PDH’s role in energy production. Read the paper here .

 

 

Fly centrioles – different after all

JCS172627F3In contrast to vertebrate centriole pairs, where the mother and daughter centriole can easily be distinguished from each other by morphology, Drosophila centrioles lack structural differences and can only be recognised by identifying specific protein markers. Marco Gottardo, Giuliano Callaini and Maria Giovanna Riparbelli used electron microscopy to examine mother and daughter centrioles in a range of fly tissues. They found that mature centrioles of somatic cells comprised doublets with a distinct cartwheel structure, whereas differentiating male germ cells had centrioles that comprised triplets. However, no structural differences between the mother and daughter centrioles could be found in any of the tissues examined. By contrast, male germline stem cells (GSCs) contained centrioles that comprised doublets, triplets or a mix thereof. Upon careful examination of the GSC niche, the authors observed that the mother centriole comprised triplets and that the daughter centriole was made up of doublets that matured into triplets. In addition, the authors showed that the mother centriole extended projections to the apical plasma membrane, which could function as an anchor to keep the mother centriole stationary during centrosome separation. This study is the first demonstration of a structural asymmetry between mother and daughter centrioles in Drosophila, which might reflect an unequal distribution of centrosomal proteins, thereby providing important insights into centrosome biology in flies.  Read the paper here .

 

 

New roles for ROPs in plant growth

JCS172445F2Rho of plant (ROP) proteins belong to the sole family of Rho-like GTPases in plants and have been suggested to regulate the polarised growth of tip-growing cells by modulating interactions between the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. However, most studies performed to date have relied on the overexpression of proteins, including constitutively active or dominant-negative isoforms, and therefore Magdalena Bezanilla and colleagues took advantage of the ease of reverse genetics and the low number of highly similar ROP proteins (ROP1–4) in the model moss Physcomitrella patens to analyse the role of ROPs using a loss-of-function approach. Knockdown of all four ROP genes by RNAi resulted in dwarf plants comprising small spherical cells that had a significantly smaller area, compared with control plants. The authors also observed that, surprisingly, ROP-knockdown plants had strongly reduced cell adhesion and an altered cell wall structure, suggesting that ROPs might have previously unappreciated roles. Importantly, the authors found that actin filaments were more dynamic and that actin arrays were more disordered in ROP-knockdown cells, but that there was no ROP-specific effect on the dynamics of the microtubule cytoskeleton. In summary, this extensive study provides important new insights into the functions of ROP proteins in cell adhesion, cell wall assembly and polarised cell growth – roles they possibly exert by suppressing actin dynamics.  Read the paper here .

 

 

JEB

 

 

 

 

Consequences of calcium decline on the embryogenesis and life history of Daphnia magna

Daphnia squareAmbient calcium is declining in thousands of soft-water lake habitats. Daphnia females provision their offspring with calcium and through that incur a potential allocation trade-off. Read the paper here.

 

 

Diverse dose–response effects of yolk androgens on embryo development and nestling growth in a wild passerine

/Passarine-squareYolk androgens in wild passerines show complex dose–response effects during early development, including both linear and non-linear responses for different traits. Read the paper here.

 

 

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Research

PhD studentship/graduate teaching assistant position (x2)

Posted by , on 28 July 2015

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University

Details on https://jobs.bangor.ac.uk/

 

The School of Biological Sciences seeks to recruit a Part-time Graduate Teaching Assistant/PhD Trainee. The successful candidate will assist with teaching across the range of disciplines in the School, but particularly in areas of Zoology, such as animal behaviour, conservation biology, evolutionary biology, systematics, comparative physiology and animal ecology. Candidates should expect to provide assistance with student research projects, practical classes, lectures, field trips, setting & marking assignments and in providing advice & pastoral care to students. Successful candidates will have the opportunity to register for a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching in Higher Education (PGCertHE).

Successful applicants will also have the opportunity to undertake a PhD or MRes project under the supervision of one of the current academic staff of the School, and will be required to obtain agreement of a principal supervisor over the topic and logistical arrangements for a project. School and individual staff research interests can be seen on our website. Tuition fees for both research degree and teaching qualification will be waived during the period of employment.

Applicants should have a good first degree in a biological-related subject and ideally some previous experience of teaching or demonstrating. Good interpersonal skills and an interest in teaching and student welfare are essential.

Overall, it is expected that approximately 56% of the postholder’s time will be made available for PhD-study, whilst 44% of the time will be for teaching and associated duties. However, the majority of the teaching and related activities will be concentrated into two semesters between late September and Early June.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs