The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

Meeting review: BSDB/Anne McLaren Memorial Trust 2016 Autumn Meeting

Posted by , on 10 February 2017

The use of chimaeras to study developmental mechanisms: from lineage tracing to disease models

 

Under the sponsorship of the Anne McLaren Memorial Trust Fund and The Company of Biologists, the BSDB Autumn meeting organised by Jenny Nichols and Tristan Rodriguez took place in the Pollock Halls at the University of Edinburgh. The topic this year was: ‘Chimaeras and their use in studying developmental processes and disease models’. Chimaeras are made of cells from two or more different organisms of the same or different species. Since their first conception, chimaeras have been an essential tool to dissect cellular potential and are used to address a large number of questions in developmental biology using a variety of different model organisms, from plants to vertebrates.
Read here the meeting report by Carla Mulas and Juan Miguel Sanchez Nieto.

 

The meeting kicked off with plenary talks by Professors Nicole le Douarin and Sir Richard Gardner, both responsible for key innovations using avian and mouse chimaeric embryos respectively. Their ideas and work led to remarkable discoveries that have been essential not only for our current knowledge in the area of developmental biology, but also to shed light on key biological concepts such cell fate and plasticity.  Nicole le Douarin presented her earlier work on the use of chick-quail chimaeras and the realisation that their different nuclear organisation could be used as a marker to distinguish host versus graft cells. She took the audience through the application of chimaeras to study the neural crest, revealing the large contribution of these cells to the development of anterior structures in vertebrates. This work remains relevant to the present day when mouse-human chimaeras have been used to trace neural crest in mammalian embryos (Cohen et al. 2016). Richard Gardner’s development of tools to enable injection of single cells into mouse blastocysts, and the successful development of the embryos thereafter, was essential to decipher clonal behaviour of cells during early mouse development – with important observations spanning the fields of embryology, epigenetics and embryonic stem cell biology.

Through the following two days, five sessions saw a wide range of applications of chimaeras discussed in various model systems. Overall, the talks were a mixture of traditional uses of chimaeras, recent innovations within this historical context and a broad range of other ideas and approaches – incorporating both the weird and the wonderful!

The first and largest session, LINEAGE TRACING AND POTENCY, focused on the use of modern labelling and imaging techniques in order to trace the descendants of specific cells, which were either labelled in situ or challenged by transplantation. What was particularly interesting in this session was how universal the application of chimaeras is in different organisms and at different developmental stages. For example, Claire Baker presented work on cells responsible for sensing hypoxia in vertebrates, trying to resolve, by a combination of lineage tracing and deletion studies, whether homologous cells in different organisms share a common embryonic origin. Both Janet Rossant and Berenika Plusa used chimaeras as tools to assess the changes in cellular potential within the mouse pre-implantation embryo as it undergoes the first two cell fate decisions. Janet explained the correlation between the plasticity of cells from the inner cell mass (ICM) and Hippo signalling pathway combining classic chimaera experiments with single cell sequencing technologies to probe deeper into questions of cell fate and cell potency in the pre-implantation mouse embryo. Berenika discussed the different roles of Sox2 and Klf4 in regulating the fate choice that ICM cells make between epiblast and primitive endoderm. Staying with the early mouse embryo, Josh Brickman argued the importance of specific nutrients in the media to support the maintenance of the naïve pluripotent and endodermal states as well as increasing the efficiency of chimaera formation. After this talk came another highlight of the meeting, Virginia Papaioannou’s tour de force on her analysis of T-box genes and their importance as an example of harnessing knowledge from the study of development to understand the human condition.

From here we moved back to avian models, where Mike Clinton, used mixed-sex chimaeras in chickens to study how the host influences the grafted tissue. He investigated how sex identity is specified, showing that somatic cells possess an identity which is cell autonomous. To round off the session, two speakers illustrated the enormous power of chimaeras and lineage labelling to uncover the boundaries for cell fate determination and cell plasticity, John West in the adult mouse cornea and Filip Wymeersch for the neuromesodermal progenitors.

 

 

In the SIGNALLING MECHANISMS session that followed, the speakers covered the influence and relevance of signalling pathways regulating cell fate choice. Claudio Stern’s hunt for a new universal organiser’s signature opened probably the most diverse session of the conference. Alexander Bruce presented his work, in which he identified p38 as a regulator of primitive endoderm differentiation in the early mouse embryo (Thamodaran and Bruce, 2016). Chris Thompson, conversely, used Dictyostelium as a model system to interrogate how genetically uniform systems can break symmetry and undergo differentiation. In this session there was also exciting insight provided by plant chimaeras. Nicola Harrison discussed the implications of the technique of grafting in apple trees and how our understanding of this process may affect the quality of the product and the yield of the crops. Kim Dale, the last speaker of this session, presented her work on how Notch amplifies Shh signalling pathway in the neural tube regulating the cell fate of neuro-ectodermal progenitors (Stasiulewicz et al. 2015).

On day two, the REGENERATIVE MEDICINE AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT session was started with a talk by Iwo Kucinski. Iwo was awarded the first Dennis Summerbell Lecture Prize, and he presented his work deciphering signalling pathways favouring the elimination of unfit cells in the process of cell competition. Interestingly Iwo showed that unfit cells, identified by a variety of means, show a number of common signalling changes that are not detrimental for viability when surrounded by other unfit cells, but that trigger their elimination when in a competitive environment with fitter cells.  Nicholas Tan presented a novel strategy (DNA Adenine-Methyltransferase Identification sequencing) to identify genome-wide transcription factor binding targets within single embryos or with samples that have only 1000 cells and Man Zhang discussed the importance of ESSRb for Nanog function. Unfortunately, Hiro Nakauchi could not attend the meeting but Hideki Masaki flew in from Japan to present his own work in collaboration with the Nakauchi lab. Very interestingly, they observed that primed pluripotent stem cells with acquired resistance to apoptosis can contribute to chimaeras when injected into blastocysts, a process that does not occur when attempted with wild-type primed pluripotent cells. These experiments suggest that not only the pluripotency status of the cells is important for efficient chimaera formation but also their apoptotic threshold, thus providing an avenue for efficient chimaera generation with cells with restricted developmental potential.

Throughout the last two sessions, DISEASE MODELS and GENE FUNCTION several speakers discussed the advances in modern techniques and their applications to developmental biology and potential regenerative therapies. For instance, Stephen Pollard and Bill Skarnes outlined CRISPR-based approaches to generate genetically modified adult and embryonic stem cells while Ben Steventon and Kenzo Ivanovich demonstrated beautiful applications of live imaging to study the development of neuro-mesodermal progenitors during axis elongation and the early stages of mouse heart development, respectively. Vasso Episkopou presented her work analysing how Arkadia modulates the levels of TGFb signalling during early mouse development and Elena Lopez-Jimenez discussed how Oct4 is not only a pluripotency factor, but can provide positional information by regulating the Hox cluster. To complement these approaches, Megan Davey gave a fascinating insight into how chick chimaeras can tell us not only about the signalling inputs that pattern the vertebrate limb, but also shed light into the evolutionary origins of our five digit structure.  The grandiose finale of the meeting was Liz Robertson, who discussed the importance of Blimp1 in the control of mammary gland development and homeostasis. Interestingly she showed how important Blimp1 is for the organization of this epithelial tissue, providing new insight into the regulation of mammary gland tissue integrity (Ahmed et al. 2016).

Throughout the meeting there were many fond tributes to Anne McLaren, who, amongst her many other accomplishments, previously organised a chimaera-themed meeting in the early 90s. A great scientific atmosphere was created during all the poster sessions that ran throughout the breaks and during the evenings, where everybody had the chance to present their work, learn, discuss and network. Reflecting the beauty of developing systems, chimaera and embryo-inspired artwork was on display and available for purchase, designed by Mia Buehr [LINK] and Aurora Lombardo [LINK].

 

Overall, it was a brilliant and diverse meeting that took the audience literally through time, from the earlier discoveries and innovations presented by the keynote speakers, towards the current state, where modern techniques are allowing a new generation of developmental biologists to explore deeper into development and disease by using chimaeras.

 

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the meeting organizers and sponsors, especially the Anne McLaren Memorial Trust Fund and the Company of Biologists. We apologize to all the speakers and references that are not mentioned directly owing to space limitations.

 

References

Ahmed M.I., Elias S., Mould A.W., Bikoff E.K. and Robertson E.J. (2016) The transcriptional repressor Blimp1 is expressed in rare luminal progenitors and is essential for mammary gland development. Development 143: 1663-1673 [doi: 10.1242/dev.136358]

Cohen M.A., Wert K.J., Goldmann J., Markoulaki S., Buganim Y., Fu D. and Jaenisch R. (2016). Human neural crest cells contribute to coat pigmentation in interspecies chimeras after in utero injection into mouse embryos. PNAS 113. 1570-75 [doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525518113]

Stasiulewicz M., Gray S.D,, Mastromina I., Silva J.C., Björklund M., Seymour P.A., Booth D., Thompson C., Green R.J., Hall E.A., Serup P. and Dale J.K. (2015) A conserved role for Notch signaling in priming the cellular response to Shh through ciliary localisation of the key Shh transducer Smo. Development 142: 2291-2303 [doi: 10.1242/dev.125237]

Thamodaran V and  Bruce A.W. (2016) p38 (Mapk14/11) occupies a regulatory node governing entry into primitive endoderm differentiation during preimplantation mouse embryo development. Open Biol. [doi: 10.1098/rsob.160190]

Thumbs up (2 votes)
Loading...

Tags: ,
Categories: Events, Societies

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

Transposons in Embryo Space – TRACER maps in EMAGE

Posted by , on 9 February 2017

A recent publication in Developmental Biology by (Armit et al., 2017) describes how the TRACER dataset can be spatially compared with in situ hybridisation gene expression profiles.


An EMAGE entry with the accompanying spatial map of a TRACER regulatory element reporter in the E11.5 mouse embryo. The original data images are shown in the upper panel. The lower panel shows spatial annotation as a colour-map, with strong expression shown in red, and moderate expression shown in yellow. Cyan denotes regions of the embryo where expression is not detected. The spatially mapped pattern can be used to query the EMAGE database of 30K gene expression patterns.

 

  • The TRACER dataset of transposon-associated regulatory sensors (Chen et al., 2013) utilises Sleeping Beauty lacZ transposons that have been randomly integrated into the mouse genome
  • Hundreds of insertions have been mapped to specific genomic positions, and the corresponding regulatory potential is documented through lacZ imaging of E11.5 wholemount mouse embryos
  • Through spatial mapping of the lacZ expression patterns, the EMAGE gene expression database enables co-localisation and co-expression of regulatory elements to be explored computationally
  • Spatial mapping additionally enables rapid identification of cis-regulatory elements that are expressed in a region of interest in the mouse embryo

 

Click here to access the spatially mapped TRACER dataset in EMAGE.

 

References

Armit C, Richardson L, Venkataraman S, Graham L, Burton N, Hill B, Yang Y, Baldock RA. eMouseAtlas: An atlas-based resource for understanding mammalian embryogenesis, Developmental Biology, Available online 2 February 2017, ISSN 0012-1606, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.01.023

 

Chen, C-K, Symmons O, Uslu VV, Tsujimura T, Ruf S, Smedley D, Spitz F. TRACER: a resource to study the regulatory architecture of the mouse genome. BMC Genomics 14 (2013), p. 215, https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-215

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Images, Research, Resources

YEN Conference 2017: Registration open now!

Posted by , on 8 February 2017

Young Embryologist Network 9th Annual Conference.

9th May 2017 at the Institute of Child Health, UCL, London.

This year, YEN is honoured to have Dr Darren Gilmour from
EMBL Heidelberg present the Sammy Lee Memorial Lecture. We are also pleased to host two invited speakers, Dr Karen Liu (King’s College London), and Professor Michael Stumpf (Imperial College London). As well as three abstract-selected talk sessions and a poster session, we are holding a Q&A panel on the topic of science communication with Jenny Jopson and Jonathan Wood from the Francis Crick institute.

We are looking for talks and posters from PhD students and Post-docs on Evo-Devo, Stem Cell, and Developmental Biology, from both experimental studies and theoretical modelling.

Whether you want to submit an abstract, or just attend the meeting, you can register here.

The deadline for abstract submission is midnight on 9th of April 2017.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Categories: Events, News, Societies

The people behind the papers: Philippe Foerster & Nathalie Spassky

Posted by , on 8 February 2017

Radial glial cells are multipotent progenitors in the developing vertebrate brain. At their apical interface with the ventricular cavity around which the brain forms, they bear a primary cilium, a signalling and sensory organelle crucial for proper brain development. Today’s paper, from a recent issue of Development, addresses the link between these primary cilia and brain morphogenesis. We caught up with first author Philippe Foerster and group leader Nathalie Spassky of the Institut de Biologie de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure in Paris.

 

 

So Nathalie, can you tell us your scientific biography and what questions your lab is interested in?

NS I am a developmental neurobiologist. For my PhD that I obtained in Paris, I studied oligodendrocyte development in vertebrates. I then studied the contribution of multiciliated ependymal cells to adult neurogenesis as a post-doctoral fellow at UCSF. In 2010, I set up my own lab at the Institut de Biologie de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, in Paris, where we develop multidisciplinary approaches to decipher the development and functions of ciliated cells in the mammalian brain.

 

What is Paris like for cell and developmental biology?

NS A highly stimulating environment with a great community of labs working on different aspects of cilia biology and brain development. The approaches range from cell biology to genetics and use a large variety of models (Xenopus, zebrafish, planarian, paramecium and rodents).

 

And Philippe, how did you come to join Nathalie’s lab?

PF I was a student in the Master 2 program in stem cell biology at the Pierre and Marie Curie University (UPMC) in Paris. I joined Nathalie Spassky’s lab for my Master 2 internship, because I was looking for a lab working on embryonic neural stem cells. I already had some experience in that field. What I immediately liked in Nathalie was her ability to mix disciplines (such as physics and biology) to approach things differently. This allowed me to contribute my computer skills to the lab and use them, especially for the analysis of apical surface segmentation.

 

Representative coronal sections of control and Kif3a mutant forebrains, from Figure 1, Foerster, et al. 2017.

 

What was known about the role of primary cilia in brain morphogenesis before your current work?

NS & PF The primary cilium has mainly been studied during early stages of brain development. A number of labs have shown that the primary cilium is crucial for telencephalic patterning and morphogenesis. The primary cilium is also a well known transducer of Sonic Hedgehog signalling.

 

Can you give us the key results of your paper in a paragraph?

NS & PF Radial glial cells are bipolar cells found throughout the brain during embryonic development. These cells undergo morphological changes during the cell cycle and brain development. We have shown that the enlargement of their apical domain during development is regulated through the primary cilium and the mTORC1 pathway. Although the phenotype observed in the ciliary mutants does not lead to major cortical defects during embryonic development, it initiates postnatal hydrocephaly and might be responsible for major postnatal brain dysfunctions. This possibility is currently being tested in the lab.

 

Segmented cortical surfaces coloured by apical cell area, from Figure 2, Foerster, et al. 2017

 

Why do you think having a larger apical surface interferes with normal radial glial cell development?

NS & PF Enlargement of the apical surface of radial glial cells affects the orientation of the mitotic spindle, maybe because radial microtubules do not attach correctly to the cell cortex during mitosis. Misorientation of the mitotic spindle leads directly to an increased number of basal progenitors and defects in cortical development, such as an alteration of the number of differentiated cells. Interestingly, we show that this phenotype can be rescued by treatment with the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin, suggesting that the apical domain is enlarged in cilia mutants through transduction of the mTORC1 pathway by the primary cilium. Further investigations are needed to determine the molecular mechanisms and whether they involves upregulation of protein synthesis.

 

Do you have an idea what is upstream and downstream of mTORC1 in this system?

NS & PF We would love to know! We think that the upstream signals could be biochemical and/or mechanical cues that would be sensed by the primary cilia. This was the reason why we generated mutants for the mechanosensory protein polycystic kidney disease 1 (Pkd1). However, no difference in the surface area of radial glial cell apical domains was observed in Pkd1 conditional mutants. It would thus be interesting to study how other mechanical stress pathways might be involved in these regulations. Similarly, the downstream signals should be the focus of future studies as they might involve specific molecular cascades and cytoskeletal modifications that would interfere with cell fate and brain development.

 

Coronal sections of the somatosensory cortex, from Figure 3, Foerster, et al. 2017.

 

What significance does your work have for our understanding of ciliopathies?

NS & PF Brain malformations are often observed in ciliopathies, although their etiology is still not well characterised. We show that primary cilia defects lead to ventricular enlargement (ventriculomegaly), which initiates postnatal hydrocephalus and might be responsible for major brain dysfunctions that still need to be characterized.

 

When doing the research, was there a particularly exciting result or eureka moment that has stayed with you?

PF It took me many hours to map the brain ventricle apical surface, which required tonnes of confocal images and lots of adjustments of the segmentation program. My eureka moment arrived when I saw for the first time the colour-coded area map of the apical surface of a Nestin-K3AcKO embryos at E14.5. When I saw lots of enlarged apical domains in Nestin-K3AcKO embryos, I realised that this tiny antenna could play a role in the development of this phenotype. I knew that we were on the right track when we obtained the western blot results showing the implication of the mTOR pathway and rescue with the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin. This pathway was already known to be involved in the proper control of cell size.

 

Classifying cells by mitotic stage, from Fig. 3, Foerster, et al. 2017

 

And what about the flipside: any moments of frustration or despair?

PF It took at least a year to breed the Nestin-K3AcKO (and IFT88cKO) mutants. At the end of my first year of thesis work, we had many problems with one of the Nestin cre line that we were using, because it unexpectedly displayed ectopic Cre expression. This was very stressful because we had to start the mouse breeding and the phenotype analysis all over again. It took another year to overcome these difficulties, but this time we double checked the cre recombinase expression before drawing conclusions!

 

Finally Philippe, what are your plans following this work?

PF I defended my thesis in September 2014. I then continued my career but in the world of IT while keeping in touch with the biomedical field. I have been working for more than 2 years now in an IT service company that is dedicated to clinical research.

 

And where next for the Spassky lab?

NS We are addressing several questions related to the molecular and cellular mechanisms of neural stem cell fate choices, multiciliated ependymal cell development and brain ventricular morphogenesis. To be continued…!!

 

Centrioles and centrosomes in ciliated radial glia, from Figure 5, Foerster, et al. 2017


 

Philippe Foerster, Marie Daclin, Shihavuddin Asm, Marion Faucourt, Alessandra Boletta, Auguste Genovesio, Nathalie Spassky. mTORC1 signaling and primary cilia are required for brain ventricle morphogenesis. Development. 144:201-210

Browse the People Behind the Papers archive here
Thumbs up (13 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , ,
Categories: Interview

D’Arcy Thompson’s On Growth and Form – 100 Years On and Still Growing!

Posted by , on 7 February 2017

“For the harmony of the world is made manifest in Form and Number, and the heart and soul and all the poetry of Natural Philosophy are embodied in the concept of mathematical beauty.”

 

Diagram from On Growth & Form first edition (published by CUP 1917)
One of the famous Transformation Diagrams from On Growth and Form (published by Cambridge University Press in 1917)

 

D’Arcy Thompson’s On Growth and Form, which celebrates its centenary this year, is one of the key works at the intersection of science and the imagination. Hailed as “the greatest work of prose in twentieth century science”, it is a book that has inspired scientists, artists and thinkers as diverse as Alan Turing, C. H. Waddington, Claude Lévi Strauss, Jackson Pollock and Norman Foster. It pioneered the science of biomathematics, and has had a profound influence in art, architecture, anthropology, geography, cybernetics and many other fields. This year we celebrate the book’s centenary with a range of conferences, exhibitions and other happenings around the world, all of which are being promoted through the website www.ongrowthandform.org

 

D'Arcy Thompson by David S Ewart (University of Dundee Museum Services)
D’Arcy Thompson by David S Ewart (University of Dundee Museum Services)

 

D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson was born in Edinburgh in 1860. He took up the first chair of biology at University College, Dundee (now the University of Dundee) in 1885, aged just 24, and spent much of his first decade building up an extensive Zoology Museum. In 1889 he wrote to one of his students, “I have taken to Mathematics, and believe I have discovered some unsuspected wonders in regard to the Spirals of the Foraminifera!”

 

D’Arcy became convinced that the laws of mathematics could be used to explain the growth and form of living organisms. This was a controversial topic and it wasn’t until 1917 that he finally published his ideas in On Growth and Form. Nature called it “at once substantial and stately… It is like one of Darwin’s books, well-considered, patiently wrought-out, learned and cautious.” The comparison to Darwin is interesting, given that many saw the book as arguing against Darwinian evolution. D’Arcy said, “where it undoubtedly runs counter to conventional Darwinism, I do not rub this in, but leave the reader to draw the obvious moral for himself.” The “obvious moral” was that Darwin was wrong in seeing the evolution of form purely as a gradual process dictated by natural selection. D’Arcy’s Theory of Transformations, the most famous and radical chapter in the book, proposed that physical forces could cause a transformation from one species into another based on mathematical principles. Through his iconic transformation diagrams, D’Arcy demonstrated that laws of growth rather than evolution could be used to explain the different forms of related species.

 

For much of the 20th century, D’Arcy’s ideas ran counter to biology’s increasing focus on evolution and genetics but a number of developmental biologists such as C H Waddington continued to champion his work. He also found followers in other fields, such as the father of modern computing, Alan Turing.

 

By the 1980s, the growth of evolutionary-developmental biology had caused D’Arcy’s work to be revisited by many that had hitherto dismissed it. Richard Dawkins has noted that “It is one of the minor tragedies of biology that D’Arcy Thompson died just before the computer age, for almost every page of his great book cries out for a computer.” Technological developments have indeed transformed the scientific relevance of D’Arcy’s work, and new mathematical modelling techniques have allowed his theories to be tested scientifically for the first time. Today even arch-geneticists like Dawkins freely acknowledge D’Arcy’s significance.

 

D’Arcy has also been described as having a greater impact on the worlds of art and architecture than any other scientist of the 20th century. On Growth and Form inspired architects and engineers from Le Corbusier and Mies van der Rohe to Norman Foster and Cecil Balmond. Henry Moore, Richard Hamilton, Eduardo Paolozzi and Salvador Dali are among the artists known to have read and drawn on the book.

 

D'Arcy Thompson Zoology Museum
D’Arcy Thompson Zoology Museum, University of Dundee (photo by Alan Richardson)

 

Although D’Arcy’s original museum was demolished in the 1950s, his surviving collection is now displayed in the D’Arcy Thompson Zoology Museum at the University of Dundee, which is used not just in teaching life sciences but also by students of fine art, design, philosophy, creative writing and other subjects. The museum is open to the public regularly over the summer and for special events and activities throughout the year.

 

D’Arcy Thompson has recently been described as “the most important figure in the future of biology” and we are determined to ensure his work continues to exert a significant influence for many years to come. The centenary of On Growth and Form is being celebrated with a major conference and exhibition in Dundee in October (call for papers to follow soon!), and many other activities both here and around the world. Visit www.ongrowthandform.org to find out more.

 

 

 

Thumbs up (5 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , ,
Categories: Events, Outreach, Science Art

New data reveals how gene knockouts affect whole embryo gene expression

Posted by , on 7 February 2017

DMDD logoNew DMDD data released on Expression Atlas reveals the effect of single gene knockouts on the expression of all other genes in the mouse genome. The gene expression profiles of 11 knockout lines have been derived from whole embryos harvested at E9.5, and the results can be compared with wild-type controls using an interactive online tool. Users can investigate which genes are differentially expressed as a result of a gene knockout, with the potential to uncover genes with similar roles or compensatory effects when a related gene is knocked out.

Data for additional lines will be released throughout 2017. The ultimate goal is to bring these molecular phenotypes together with the morphological phenotypes that have already been derived by the DMDD programme, to offer new insights about the effects of gene knockout on embryo development.


THE GENOMIC EFFECTS OF Ssr2 KNOCKOUT

The knockout of Ssr2 in the mouse was found to affect the expression level of 325 genes in total, and this is one of the 11 new datasets that can be explored in Expression Atlas.

The differential expression of each gene is described using the log2 fold change – a measure that describes the ratio of gene expression in the knockout to the level of gene expression in a wild-type control. A negative fold change (shown in blue in the image below) means that the gene was expressed at a lower level in the mutant. A positive fold change (shown in red in the image below) means that the gene was expressed at a higher level in the mutant.

A visualisation of the level of differential expression of 8 genes affected by the knockout of Ssr2.
Eight genes that are differentially expressed due to a knockout of the gene Ssr2 (above a cut off log2 fold change of 0.4). Six genes are expressed at a higher level, while Mfap2 and Ssr2 are expressed at a lower level.

 

The interactive tool in Expression Atlas allows different cut-offs to be applied to the fold change, so the genes displayed can be restricted to those with a large differential expression. The image above shows the 8 genes with a fold change greater than 0.4 as a result of knocking out the gene Ssr2.

The tool can also be used to visualise the data in graphical form. The plot below shows the fold change for each gene, allowing the user to quickly ascertain the extent to which a gene knockout caused differential expression of other genes. All 325 genes considered to have a significant change in the level of gene expression are plotted in red, with the rest shown in grey.

 

 

Graphical visualisation of the fold change for each gene in the mouse genome, following knockout of the Ssr2 gene.
A graphical visualisation of the fold change for each gene. The outlier with a fold change of -3.5 is the gene Ssr2, which has a much-reduced expression level in an Ssr2 knockout embryo.


The full list of lines with data currently available is: 1700007K13Rik, 4933434E20Rik, Adamts3, Anks6, Camsap3, Cnot4, Cyp11a1, Mir96, Otud7b, Pdzk1 and Ssr2.

The full dataset for any line can be downloaded for further analysis, while the individual line pages on Expression Atlas integrate the DMDD data with other pre-existing data, in cases where a gene has already been shown to alter expression.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Highlights

This month on the Node and beyond

Posted by , on 7 February 2017

January was a productive month on the Node, with a variety of developmental biology content from the lab bench and beyond.

 

Research

We heard from the authors of a bunch of recent papers, including Ripla Arora on her recent Development paper on imaging the implanting embryo and uterine environment in 3D, and Kyle Martin on his recent PNAS paper which links taste, teeth and scales in sharks.

 

 

Nitya Ramkumar told us what Crumbs has to do with cell shape and gastrulation, highlighting her recent NCB paper, and Sylvia Dyballa and Cristina Pujades intorduced their eLife paper on using 4D imaging to understand inner ear morphogenesis. Highlighting another eLife paper, Ko Currie told us how planarian adults controlled neurogenesis.

 

People

Our People behind the Papers series continued with Miguel Brun-Usan and Isaac Salazar-Ciudad (University of Helsinki) on modelling and embryology, and Ehsan Pourkarimi and Iestyn Whitehouse (Sloan-Kettering, NY) on DNA replication and gene transcription.

 

 

Isabel Almudi, a postdoc in Fernando Casares’ lab in Seville, walked us through a day in the life of a mayfly lab and the beautiful eyes of the male flies.

 

 

We heard from three Company of Biologists Travelling Fellows – Hanna Hakkinen,  Nanami Morooka and Tetsuto Miyashita – who collectively crossed continents to learn new techniques in host labs.

 

 

Testsuto also told us about a meeting he had been to: the First International Hemichordate Meeting, and celebrated the potential of this enigmatic group of animals. We also heard from four undergraduate students who had received the Gurdon/The Company of Biologists Summer Studentships from the BSDB.

 

Beyond the lab

Valerie Butler argued for culturally relevant science education, to increase engagement and representation. Finally, a couple of resources: first in our latest round up of developmental biology preprints, and second in the awesome Lifemap, a zoomable and addictive online tool for exploring the tree of life, as introduced by its creator Damien de Vienne.

 

Around the web

 

The best tweets

 

 

https://twitter.com/AuditoryNerves/status/824301219460030464

 

 

 

https://twitter.com/FredrikJutfelt/status/823512955522256896

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://twitter.com/vividbiology/status/818491340489162752

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://twitter.com/debivort/status/823934351985545216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Highlights

PhD Scholarship – The Role of Cell Polarity in Tissue Repair

Posted by , on 7 February 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

(A/Prof Helena Richardson’s & Prof Patrick Humbert’s laboratories at the Department of Biochemistry & Genetics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences (LIMS), La Trobe University Melbourne Campus (Bundoora)

 

We offer a PhD scholarship to an exceptional student (who has achieved a H1 Honours or equivalent) to determine how cell polarity perturbations affect signalling pathways in tissue repair. The project utilizes the model organism, Drosophila, and mammalian epithelial cell culture. This project will have important implications for understanding wound healing as well as cancer.

 

The Applicant should have Australian citizenship or residency. They should be highly driven and have a high level of achievement, including a first class Honours degree or equivalent in the field of Cell Biology and/or Genetics. Knowledge of Cell Biology theory and techniques is essential, and knowledge of Genetics, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry approaches is desirable. Experience in the Drosophila model organism, although not essential, will be highly beneficial.

 

The project will address the role of cell shape (polarity) regulation in epithelial tissue homeostasis, using an in vivo approach utilizing the Drosophila model system, and an in vitro approach with cultured mammalian epithelial cells. Sophisticated genetic techniques will be used to generate mutant patches of cells within an epithelium and the effect on cell morphology, cell extrusion, signalling pathways, cell proliferation, apoptosis and protein-protein interactions will be monitored utilizing sophisticated cell biological approaches involving fixed samples or live cell imaging. The project seeks to reveal novel mechanisms by which mutant cells interact with their microenvironment that can be utilized therapeutically to improve wound repair or to enhance elimination of the mutant cells.

 

Benefits of the scholarship

Benefits of the scholarship include:

  • A La Trobe University Research Scholarship for three years, with a value of $26,288 per annum, to support your living costs [2016 rate]
  • Opportunities to work with outstanding researchers at the Department of Biochemistry & Genetics, LIMS and have access to cutting-edge equipment and professional development programs
  • Opportunities for authorship on high impact scientific manuscripts.
  • Opportunities to attend national and international conferences

 

How to apply

  • Review how to apply for a graduate research scholarship at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/research/future/apply
  • Contact A/Prof. Helena Richardson by email at h.richardson@latrobe.edu.au, with a full CV, academic transcript, and a cover letter outlining why you would like to be considered for this scholarship.
  • A/Prof Helena Richardson and Prof Patrick Humbert at the Department of Biochemistry & Genetics, LIMS will carefully review your application and consider you for this Scholarship.
  • The successful applicant who receives in-principle agreement for supervision, will then submit a complete PhD application to the La Trobe Graduate Research School, attaching a copy of the agreement to admissions.grs@latrobe.edu.au

 

You will be advised of an outcome by 30th April, 2017.

 

Closing date

Applications close 1 April 2017, unless filled sooner.

 

Contact us

If you require further information, please contact:  h.richardson@latrobe.edu.au or the La Trobe University Graduate Research School: grs@latrobe.edu.au

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

PhD Scholarship – Embryo Development and Craniofacial Defects Research

Posted by , on 7 February 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

A Ph.D. scholarship offered to an exceptional student, to investigate genetic mechanisms which underpin vertebrate birth defects, with a particular focus on craniofacial defects such as cleft palate.

 

This scholarship will be offered to an independent, proactive, forward thinking and enthusiastic candidate, who wishes to forge an independent career in science.

 

Applicants should have a high level of achievement, including a first class honours degree or equivalent.

 

As an applicant you should have an interest in developmental genetics and understanding the processes which govern embryo formation, as well as a keen interest and aptitude in biochemistry and molecular genetics. Your project will address biological and cellular behaviours which regulate how the vertebrate embryos forms, using the mouse, and zebrafish as genetic developmental models.


Benefits of the scholarship

Benefits of the scholarship include:

  • a La Trobe Research Scholarship for three years, with a value of $26,288 per annum, to support your living costs [2016 rate]
  • a fee-relief scholarship (LTUFFRS) for four years to undertake a PhD at La Trobe University (international applicants only)
  • opportunities for authorship on high impact scientific manuscripts.
  • opportunities to attend national and international conferences
  • opportunities to work with La Trobe’s outstanding researchers, and have access to our suite of professional development programs


How to apply

  • Review how to apply for a graduate research scholarship at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/research/future/apply
  • Contact Dr. Seb Dworkin by email at s.dworkin@latrobe.edu.au, with a full CV, academic transcript, and a cover letter outlining why you would like to be considered for this scholarship.
  • Dr. Dworkin, and the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology will carefully review your application and consider you for this Scholarship.
  • The successful applicant who receives in-principle agreement for supervision, will then submit a complete PhD application to the La Trobe Graduate Research School, attaching a copy of the agreement to admissions.grs@latrobe.edu.au

 

You will be advised of an outcome by 30th April, 2017.

 

Closing date

Applications close 1 April 2017, unless filled sooner.

 

Contact us

If you require further information, please contact:  s.dworkin@latrobe.edu.au or the La Trobe University Graduate Research School: grs@latrobe.edu.au

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Postdoctoral Position Developmental and Cancer Biology

Posted by , on 6 February 2017

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

An NIH-funded postdoctoral researcher position is available immediately in Dr. Nadia Dahmane laboratory at Cornell University-Weill Cornell Medicine in the Department of Neurological Surgery to study the transcriptional regulation of normal brain development and brain tumor progression. Our group uses cell biology, mouse genetics, biochemical and genomic approaches to decipher the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling brain development and brain tumor progression (e.g. Xiang et al. Cell Death and Differentiation 2012; Baubet et al., Development 2012,Tatard et al., Cancer Research 2010; Deng et al. Journal of Cell Science 2012).

We seek enthusiastic, highly qualified and motivated individuals to join our research group. The successful candidate should have a Ph.D. degree with a strong background in molecular biology, cell biology, and/or biochemistry. Research experience in developmental neuroscience, cancer biology and animal models of brain diseases would be considered advantageous.

Our laboratory is located on the Weill Cornell Medicine campus in New York City.

Please submit your CV and a cover letter outlining your research interests, career goals and the names of three referees with contact information to Dr. Nadia Dahmane at: nad2639@med.cornell.edu

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs