Here is our monthly round-up of some of the interesting content that we spotted around the internet:

News

– Developmental biologist Jim Smith, director of MRC National Institute for Medical Research, has been announced as the new MRC Deputy Chief Executive and Chief of Strategy.

– Elena Cattaneo is the winner of 2013 Stem Cell Person of the Year Award run by the Knoepfler lab stem cell blog. f you are interested in Elena’s work, you can read a Node post about one of her papers.

– If you are a member of the Society for Developmental Biology, nominations are now open for the 2014 SDB awards.

– And the shortlist for the 2013 Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books has been announced. You can read the review of one of the shortlisted books, ‘Cells to Civilizations’, on this Node post.

Weird & Wonderful

– Halloween is the season for pumpkin carving, and twitter was full of science-themed pumpkins! We even carved our own Node Halloween pumpkin! And if you use stats in your research, you might also like this Halloween statistics cartoon.

– We spotted some stunning science cakes as part of a CRUK initiative, including this amazing cake representing a scientist hard at work in the lab.

– And if you were ever frustrated by how scientists in movies never seem to be able to pipette correctly, then this website is for you (scroll to the bottom for some of the best picks).

Beautiful and interesting images

– The winners of the Nikon Small World 2013 competition have been announced. Check out their website to see the stunning winning images!

– Ever wondered what a banana flower looks like in an MRI? Check this website for the answer– very beautiful!

– And check out this great trick of mimicry in nature!

Videos worth watching

– The finalists of the 2013 Dance your PhD competition have been announced. You can vote for your favourite dance here.

– This year marks the 100 years of the death of Alfred Wallace, and the New York Times released this nice animation of his life and legacy:
 

As usual, you can keep up with this and other content, including all Node posts and deadlines of coming meetings, by following the Node on Twitter.

Here are the highlights from the new issue of Development:

Broken-hearted over Hippo

Mammalian cardiac regeneration is greatly impeded by the massive loss of cardiomyocytes that occurs following acute injury. The failure of the remaining cells to proliferate is a considerable challenge for the field, but the molecular mechanisms that control cardiomyocyte proliferation in the adult heart are largely unknown. Now, on p. 4683, James Martin and colleagues demonstrate a role for Hippo signalling in suppressing adult and postnatal murine cardiomyocyte proliferation. Using conditional knockouts, the authors show that removal of Hippo pathway members Salv or Lats1 and Lats2 from normal adult cardiomyocytes results in increased proliferation, as these cells are able to re-enter the cell cycle and undergo cytokinesis. Moreover, removal of Salv from cardiomyocytes in vivo results in improved cardiac regeneration after adult myocardial infarction, a time when regeneration is usually severely impaired. Here, the authors observed reduced scarring and full restoration of cardiac function. This elegant study suggests that Hippo signalling is a repressor of adult cardiomyocyte renewal and regeneration.

Osr2 PAX a punch in palate formation

Precise orchestration of palate formation involves the complex interaction of signalling cascades and transcriptional networks in the developing craniofacial region. Pax9 and Osr2 have previously been implicated in palate formation, but little is known about how these molecular components interact within the greater regulatory network. Now, on p. 4709, Rulang Jiang and colleagues report a crucial role for Pax9 in patterning the anterior-posterior axis as well as outgrowth of the developing palatal shelves. The authors show that Pax9 regulates mesenchyme-epithelium interactions during pattern formation and that the expression of several key genes involved in palate development, such as Shh, Bmp4, Fgf10, Msx1 and Osr2, is reduced in Pax9 mutant mice. Interestingly, expression of Osr2 from the Pax9 locus was able to rescue the posterior, but not anterior, palate formation defect in the absence of Pax9 function. These data place Pax9 upstream of transcription factor Osr2 and signalling molecules Bmp4, Fgf10 and Shh in the molecular network that regulates palate development.

Par3 makes contact in migrating mesenchyme

Contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL) is a fundamental regulatory mechanism that ensures correct cell movement and migration. During CIL, cells form transient contacts but the molecular nature of such contacts is unknown. In this issue, Roberto Mayor and colleagues (p. 4763) investigate the role of the cell polarity protein Par3 in microtubule collapse and reorganisation during CIL in migrating neural crest cells. Using antisense morpholinos to Par3 in Xenopus and zebrafish, the authors show that loss of Par3 has a dramatic effect on migration and is essential for CIL both in vitro and in vivo. Par3 knockdowns fail to exhibit microtubule collapse at the cell-cell contact; however, this can be rescued by injection of an antisense morpholino to Trio, implicating the Rac-GEF Trio in migrating neural crest CIL. The authors propose a model in which CIL requires the local destabilisation of microtubules at the cell-cell contacts, which is controlled in a Par3/Trio-dependent manner.

Designer flies: accelerated genome editing in Drosophila

The immense power of Drosophila genetics has allowed invaluable insight into developmental biology. Despite these advances, a significant limitation has always been the lack of an efficient method for modifying select genetic loci. Now, on p. 4818, Jean-Paul Vincent and colleagues report high-efficiency homologous recombination in Drosophila with a novel gene-targeting vector. This can be achieved via a two-generation crossing scheme or via direct embryo injection. Importantly, both approaches yield few false-positives due to efficient negative selection, while readily detectable markers aid in the rapid identification of correctly targeted flies. The efficiency can be further increased by co-injecting the sequence-specific endonuclease CRISPR/Cas9. The investigators also report a series of vectors that can be used to insert different genetic elements into the targeted loci, such as mutated or tagged cDNAs and additional reporter genes. Their approach will enable genetic modification in a wide range of contexts, including in postmitotic cells. These tools will be a valuable resource for the Drosophila community.

Puffyeye regulates Myc-mediated cell growth

Proper control of cell size is vital to ensure the correct growth and development of any organism. The Myc family of proteins are key regulators of growth, but the mechanisms that control Myc protein levels are complex. Now, on p. 4776, Robert Eisenman and colleagues identify Drosophila Puffyeye (Puf), an orthologue of mammalian USP34, as a novel ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) regulating dMyc-dependant cell growth at the post-translational level. Using genetic interaction experiments, the authors demonstrate that puf opposes the activity of the ubiquitin ligase archipelago (ago) and that Puf acts to stabilise dMyc protein levels. Overexpression of puf in the eye and wing phenocopies dMyc overexpression, while expression of a catalytically inactive form of Puf had no effect, demonstrating the requirement of the Puf USP catalytic domain. Interestingly, the authors demonstrated that Puf can also regulate Ago and Cyclin E protein levels. These data reveal a new mechanism by which dMyc levels can be regulated by USPs in order to fine-tune cell growth.

GDF5 determines dendrite growth

Dendrite complexity determines the functional properties of neurons and the overall connectivity of neuronal circuits. The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family is known to regulate a myriad of developmental processes, but the extent to which different members of the family are involved in dendrite growth remains unclear. In this issue (p. 4751), Alun Davies and colleagues identify growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5), a member of the BMP family, as a key regulator of dendrite growth and complexity in the pyramidal neurons of the developing hippocampus. Mice harbouring a mutation in Gdf5 showed dramatically reduced dendrite size and complexity. In vitro, exogenous GDF5 treatment was sufficient to increase elongation of the dendrites, but not the axons, of pyramidal cells derived from the developing mouse hippocampus. The authors further demonstrated that GDF5-mediated dendrite growth acts via the Smad signalling pathway and that GDF5-regulated HES5 expression is both necessary and sufficient for enhanced dendritic growth and complexity.

PLUS…

Nutritional regulation of stem and progenitor cells in Drosophila

Stem cells and their progenitors are maintained within a microenvironment, termed the niche, but it is known that systemic signals originating outside the niche also affect stem cell and progenitor behavior. Here, Utpal Banerjee and colleagues review recent studies of nutritional effects on stem and progenitor cell maintenance and proliferation in Drosophila. See the Review article on p. 4647

Cell-intrinsic drivers of dendrite morphogenesis

The proper formation and morphogenesis of dendrites is fundamental to the establishment of neural circuits in the brain. In this issue, Sidharth Puram and Azad Bonni review cell-intrinsic drivers of dendrite patterning and discuss how the characterization of such regulators advances our understanding of normal brain development and pathogenesis of diverse cognitive disorders. See the Review on p. 4657

Endoreplication (endoreduplication or endomitosis) is the process by which a cell undergoes successive rounds of DNA replication without an intervening mitosis and its accompanying cytokinesis. Developmentally programmed endoreplication causes differentiating cells, such as TGCs and megakaryocytes (MKCs), to become highly polyploid. Our recent study published in Development (Sakaue-Sawano et al., 2013) comparatively characterized endoreduplication (TGCs) and endomitosis (MKCs) using Fucci (Fluorescent Ubiquitination-based Cell Cycle Indicator) technology. Our long-term imaging experiments also enabled monitoring of endoreplication for weeks, which revealed that the transition from endoG2 to endoG1 in MKCs varied with the polyploidy level.

The Fucci technology harnesses the cell cycle dependent proteolysis of two ubiquitin oscillators, human Cdt1 and Geminin, which are the direct substrates of the SCF^Skp2 and APC^Cdh1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, respectively (Sakaue-Sawano et al., 2008).

The image shown above is a comprehensive perspective view of cell-cycle progression in a mouse fetal-placental unit (embryonic day 11.5) that was fixed with 4% formaldehyde and then optically cleared by the Scale technique (Hama et al., 2011). The fluorescent cell cycle indicator Fucci was expressed ubiquitously in the tissues. Green and red signals indicate the presence of FucciS/G2/M (mAG-hGem(1/110)) and FucciG1(G0) (mKO2-hCdt1(30/120)) probes, and signify cell proliferation and differentiation, respectively. The developing heart inside the fetus is most clearly illuminated. Remarkably, the enormous nuclei of endoreplicating trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) scattered in the placenta are highlighted in green and red, indicating endoS/G2 and endoG1 phases, respectively.

We would like to express our concern about the inaccurate usage of Fucci terminology in recent literature. While an increasing number of papers report cell cycle dynamics by use of the Fucci technology, the two Fucci probes, mKO2-hCdt1(30/120) and mAG-hGem(1/110), are often called mKO2-Cdt1 and mAG-Geminin, respectively, without annotation. However, this terminology misleads readers into believing that the Fucci probe contains the entire Cdt1 or Geminin protein. In fact, quite a few researchers are wondering whether such probes perturb the cell cycle regulation in recipient cells. In our original study of Fucci (Sakaue-Sawano et al. 2008), we made considerable effort to extract the regulatory domains (ubiquitination domains) from Cdt1 and Geminin. After performing long-term time-lapse imaging of numerous constructs, we demonstrated that amino acid residues 30-120 of human Cdt1 (hCdt1(30/120)) and amino acid residues 1-110 of human Geminin (hGem(1/110)) are both necessary and sufficient for this purpose. We would like to request that future studies using Fucci technology should include the full names of the probes, mKO2-hCdt1(30/120) and mAG-hGem(1/110), in the methods.

Hama, H., Kurokawa, H., Kawano, H., Ando, R., Shimogori, T., Noda, H., Fukami, K., Sakaue-Sawano, A. and Miyawaki, A. (2011). ‘Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain’, Nat. Neurosci. 14: 1481-1488.

Sakaue-Sawano, A., Kurokawa, H., Morimura, T., Hanyu, A., Hama, H., Osawa, H., Kashiwagi, S., Fukami, K., Miyata, T., Miyoshi, H., Imamura, T., Ogawa, M., Masai, H. And Miyawaki, A. (2008). ‘Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression’, Cell 132: 487-498.

Sakaue-Sawano, A,. Hoshida, T., Yo, M., Takahashi, R., Ohtawa, K., Arai, T., Takahashi, E., Miyoshi, H. and Miyawaki, A. (2013) ‘Visualizing developmentally programmed endoreplication in mammals using ubiquitin oscillators’, Development.  140:4624-4632.

Earlier this year, Development launched Stem Cells & Regeneration: a website dedicated to hosting all of the journal’s stem cell and regeneration content. This online home means that you can now receive email alerts that contain only the Stem Cells & Regeneration content from Development. So if this is your main interest, sign up for email alerts now.

More than just an outlet for the latest research, Development’s Stem Cells & Regeneration page is also a home for the community. With regular posts on stem cell news, events, awards and meetings, the website will keep you up to date and in the loop of the stem cell scene.

There’s also a Stem Cells & Regeneration Image Gallery page, which shows how truly beautiful this area of science can be. Visit the Image Gallery and submit your own!

The website contains all of Development’s latest research papers covering the stem cell and regeneration fields, as well as new techniques and resources for the community. The site also offers the latest review articles, plus coverage of key community meetings such this year’s EMBO/EMBL Cardiac Biology: From Development to Regeneration report, as well as a report on the Cambridge Stem Cell Institute’s recent Physical Biology of Stem Cells meeting.

For a trip down memory lane, don’t miss the Highlighted Articles section, where we mine the archives for some truly classic Development papers, like this one from the Rossant lab in 1990.

There also a handy tool for searching particular areas within Development’s Stem Cell & Regeneration content. Or you can customise your own search here.

The launch of the website coincides with a new research section within Development, entitled “Stem Cells And Regeneration”. By doing this, Development is reaching out to the stem cell and regeneration communities,with the aim of highlighting the fundamental importance of developmental principles in these research areas. For more on why Development feels that this is important, click here.

So sign up and stay tuned as Stem Cells & Regeneration brings you the latest Development papers in the field. Engage with us and become part of your community.

Following the publication in Nucleic Acids Research of my new database that I developed in Olivier Pourquié’s lab, I would like to introduce you to Manteia http://manteia.igbmc.fr/. This database contains a lot of information (genomic, regulation, interaction, phenotype, disease etc …) for animal models (mouse, chicken, zebrafish) and man. These data are all formatted so they can be used together. In a same species, this makes it possible to ask complex questions by combining different types of data, but you can also use data from different species in order to supplement them or make predictions.

Mining huge complex datasets usually requires computer skills that few biologists have. However the user interface available for most public databases is too basic to really give a biologist the freedom to study all these data as a whole and make new discoveries. This is why I have developed new easy to use data mining and visualization tools for Manteia. One of these tools is called Refine. It allows to break down a complex biological question into multiple simple queries. For example, to identify candidate genes potentially involved in human muscle diseases using mouse phenotype data while taking into account a linkage analysis, one will select the genes corresponding to the chromosome region of interest using a tool called “chromosome location”, then from the result page one will search for their mouse orthologs using the “orthology” tool to finally find the genes involved in muscle phenotypes using “phenotype” or involved in myogenesis using “gene ontology “. The whole process takes a few seconds and gives the researchers the freedom to test different strategies to refine their list of candidates.

Another search tool is called “Query Builder “. This tool uses a simple interface to create complex queries such as: “I am looking for genes belonging to the Wnt signaling pathway and involved in somitogenesis but not in myogenesis” using Boolean operators (and, or, not). Several independent queries can be addressed at the same time. This is particularly useful when one is looking for genes that could explain a patient’s clinical features. In this case a query will be designed for each feature and the system will order the genes by relevance without discarding those that do not correspond to all of the symptoms. Every datasets can be used together to create a query. Whether to make predictions, test hypotheses or analyze experimental results.

Manteia is not limited to the selection of genes based on their annotation. Datasets can be analyzed statistically to see if they tend to be involved in the same biological functions, in the same signaling pathways, if they come from the same chromosomal regions etc. … this is particularly useful for analyzing deregulated genes from microarray or RNA seq experiments. These statistical tools can also be used to see which annotations are correlated to check, for example, if the genes involved in a biological process or a disease belong to the same signaling pathway.

There are a lot more things you can do with this system. Feel free to read the article (http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/gkt807?ijkey=8NMUhzVEjkVGdGw&keytype=ref) and watch our tutorial videos to learn more about Manteia. The release of the paper is not the end but the beginning of the project. Feel free to give your impressions on this database, make suggestions to improve the user experience or suggest new data to be entered in the system.

Enjoy. http://manteia.igbmc.fr/

A few examples of data visualization tools from Manteia

I am James Lloyd and have just finished my PhD at the University of Leeds, UK working with Prof Brendan Davies (plant developmental biologist) and Dr Andrew Cuming (moss biologist).

Moss is a plant, a fact that some people I eat lunch with refuse to believe. It is sometimes called primitive. While moss does look like plants that exist in the fossil records and lived hundred of millions of years ago, it has been evolving during this time, so what is true for modern moss might not have been true of ancient plants. But moss is very useful in comparative studies, allowing us to gain an insight into the evolution of developmental processes and assess how ancient they are.

To keep moss happy in the lab, we grow it on agar plates with a defined medium in a room with continuous light at 25 ^oC. Here, a whole plant (often called a colony) will grow from a single haploid spore or a ‘spot’ of moss tissue. Any part of a moss plant can regenerate to form a new moss plant on standard media, making it easy to routinely subculture moss. The main body of the plant is haploid, in contrast to animals and vascular plants, in which most tissues are diploid.

A moss plant consists of filamentous tissue (protonemata), which are great for studying polar tip growth in plants. These filaments branch and eventually some of these branches become leafy shoot-like structures called gametophores (see photos). At the base of these gametophores, filaments called rhizoids grow and anchor it in the agar.

Photo of moss by James Lloyd University of Leeds

Moss can take months to go through the full life-cycle but only takes about three weeks to produce fully expanded colonies with large gametophores, which can be studied. If you are brave enough to go through the whole life-cycle (as moss will regenerate any tissue, you do not always need to bother unless you want to phenotype the diploid tissue), you can grow moss in short day conditions (8 hours light, 16 hours dark) while being cooled to 16 ^oC stimulates production of the reproductive organs at the apex of gametophores. A few drops of water will then allow the water-dependent sperm to swim and fertilise egg cells resulting in the appearance of a small diploid structure at the apex of a gametophore. Inside this ‘sporophyte’, meiosis will occur and many new haploid spores will be produced.

Moss is a user-friendly model plant. It mostly sits there on a Petri dish, photosynthesising. Moss could almost be thought of as the yeast of the plant kingdom because it is grown on defined media but can also have genes knocked out at will using homologous recombination.

While most plant researchers wanting to study mutants of their favourite gene need to make RNAi knockdown lines or hope someone has randomly hit that gene with a point mutation or transposons/T-DNA insertion, moss researchers can ‘easily’ make their own knockout mutant lines. Flowering plants have to low a rate of homologous recombination to make this feasible, but it would greatly improve GM strategies. You could even knock-in tags or mutations in to your favourite genes, in case a full deletion isn’t appropriate. Just clone around one kilobase of DNA from upstream and downstream of the gene you want to knock around an antibiotic selection gene and you are away.

A day in the life of a moss researcher can vary a lot depending on if you are transforming moss with your knockout construct you have just made or if you are sub-culturing it or simply pulling the plant apart to phenotype. Generally moss is happy to be left alone for a while and can be easily manipulated in a molecular lab. To collect filamentous tissue for phenotyping or transformation, moss can be homogenized or blended (click in the photo below for a bigger image).

Moss is a useful model to understand how plant development has evolved over the last few hundred million years and the basic mechanisms underlining some growth forms such as polar tip growth could be better understood. Moss also has its uses in better understanding processes common to all plants. Animal researchers have used multiple, evolutionarily distant model organisms for years, which has helped better understanding in many processes as different models have their own advantages and disadvantages. Moss has many advantages over the flowering plant model Arabidopsis thaliana, such as easy to generate gene knockouts and easy of propagation of tissue. Studying moss can reveal insights about basic pathways (such as RNA decay) in plants that were not apparent from studying A. thaliana alone. Sometimes what is true for moss is true of rice, but not of A. thaliana.

How to homogenise moss by Dr Andrew Cuming University of Leeds

Thanks to Dr Barry Causier for proof reading and Dr Andrew Cuming for moss homogenising photo.

This post is part of a series on a day in the life of developmental biology labs working on different model organisms. You can read the introduction to the series here and read other posts in this series here.

The Pluripotent Stem Cell Platform (PSCP) is a hub in the UK Regenerative Medicine Platform, a joint research council programme to tackle the critical challenges in developing new regenerative treatments (www.ukrmp.org.uk). PSCP is a multi-disciplinary collaboration focussed on the quality controlled manufacturing and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells suitable for clinical applications (http://www.ukrmp.org.uk/hubs/cell-behaviour-differentiation-and-manufacturing/).

Two post-doctoral positions are available in a programme headed by Austin Smith and Ludovic Vallier at the Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (www.stemcells.cam). The research is centred on optimising the generation and expansion of human iPS cells and derivative foregut endoderm and neural progenitor stem cells. The main objective is to harness the basic biology of these progenitor cells for the development of new cell based therapy approaches.

Candidates should have at least 3 years experience with culture and characterisation of pluripotent stem cells and/or their differentiation products.

Applications are encouraged from candidates with an appreciation of cell production for clinical use and/or Good Manufacturing Practice are encouraged

Technical support will be available and access to a range of flow cytometry, imaging and qPCR instrumentation.

Posts are funded for two years.

Salary: £27,854 – £36,298

Once an offer of employment has been accepted, the successful candidate will be required to undergo a health assessment.

To apply, please visit our vacancies webpage: http://www.stemcells.cam.ac.uk/careers-study/vacancies/

Informal enquiries are also welcome via email to: cscrjobs@cscr.cam.ac.uk

Applications must be submitted by 17:00 on the closing date of Thursday 12^th December 2013.

Interviews will be held towards the end of week commencing 16^th December 2013.If you have not been invited for interview by 16^th December 2013., you have not been successful on this occasion.

Please quote reference PS02164 on your application and in any correspondence about this vacancy.

The University values diversity and is committed to equality of opportunity.

Cosy Science is a non profit organisation formed in 2012 at Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, by a group of young scientists: Olga Martins de Brito, Kinga Bercsenyi and Nathalie Schmieg. After few months the team expanded with the additions of Mario Ruiz, Alessandra Audia, Michael Parkinson and Mariana Campos.

Our main objective is to get the public more involved in science, with an emphasis on asking questions and discussing rather than sitting and quietly listening for an hour in a lecture theatre. What makes this different from other science cafés is that it is set in the friendly, comfortable environment of a pub to attract people from all backgrounds and to encourage them to ask questions.

Our first speaker was Nobel Prize laureate Sir Tim Hunt, who speaks at the Exmouth Arms, our first venue, about winning his Nobel Prize. The night was a huge success thanks to a large turnout of fellow scientists and friends but having a Nobel Prize winner as a first speaker also helped.

After this triumph, the Cosy Science team set about inviting leading scientists from a broad range of disciplines/scientific backgrounds such as Professor David Nutt on drug policy and the Professor Steve Miller on the chemical cosmos. Our Science café has now become a hugely popular regular event, held on the last Tuesday of every month.

With publicity from The Londonist and TimeOut, we have seen our numbers swell to 300 followers on Twitter, 500 likes on Facebook and more than 400 contact on our emailing lists. From such a large network, we generally struggle to fit everyone into our larger venue and the Cittie of Yorke (just round the corner on High Holborn) but we still see people coming back for more – regulars and newcomers alike.

Our speakers are invited to give a brief talk of around 30 minutes to introduce their field of research highlighting interesting facts and key aims of their research. Afterwards there is a little break in which the audience can play a game specially designed by us for the topic of the talk. During this pause we collect donations from the audience to allow us to continue our project. Later we open the discussion to the floor and that, in some cases, can last for over an hour.

The Company of Biologists and EMBO both liked the idea of the science café to attract the public to scientific talks and thanks to that we have sourced funding for several events and we were able to provide free food and drinks. This initiative helped us to attract more people to our events – not bad for an organization with humble beginnings from London Research Institute.

Our invited speakers are scientists who, frequently in their careers, speak to a very specific audience. However, Cosy Science aims to communicate science to a lay audience. Our main challenge is to make sure that our speakers are able to keep a clear and simple language, avoiding too much jargon.  In this way our audience can understand the talk, be captivated and curious about the subject. To ensure that this is the case we often meet with the speakers beforehand and keep in touch with them throughout their preparation to provide them with guidance when they need it. Imagine a group of PhD students helping a group leader with designing a talk and selling their topic to an audience without the use of any visual aids!

As PhD students we spend most of our day in the lab, doing experiments at the bench, surrounded by scientists that share our love for science. Cosy Science gives us the platform to share this passion with everyone who is open minded enough to take it! We believe that explaining one’s research to an audience that is not from that specific field makes it easier to step back from the day-to-day problems and see the bigger picture, question basic assumptions we might not even think of, and at last but not at least to think outside the box. Furthermore, as the general public funds our research, we strongly believe that they should be aware and understand the outcomes of their investment in us.

Our next event will take place on the 26^th of November at 7pm and will be ‘Unlocking the Secrets Behind Regenerative Medicine’. The evening is funded by the British Council and will include free food and drinks. We invite you to come over: it’s going to be a very fascinating night in which a panel of scientists will help us to understand the immense potential of a stem cell research.

As a non-profit organisation we recently received a fellowship for outreach activities sponsored by EMBO. We are therefore planning to expand our activities and organise a kids’ version of the science café – a science club! Kids will have the opportunity to listen, see and touch science done by real scientist in a relaxed environment not called ‘School’. We aim to foster their interest in science, their creativity and their critical thinking.

And who knows? Maybe there is even more room to expand: a larger venue, renowned speakers or more frequent talks, not even talking about the idea of doing our own version of Science Show Off with PhD students, so if you have any suggestions, fell free to get in touch with us at cosciuk@gmail.com.

Alessandra Audia & Mariana Campos

This post is part of a series on science outreach. You can read the introduction to the series here and read other posts in this series here.

Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Developmental Neurobiology Excellent Opportunity for an experienced Postdoctoral Research Fellow to work in a world class Research Institute.

Queensland Brain Institute The Queensland Brain Institute (QBI) was established as a research institute of the University of Queensland in 2003. The Institute is now operating out of a new state-of-the-art facility and houses 31 Principal Investigators with strong international reputations. The QBI is one of the largest neuroscience institutes in the world dedicated to understanding the mechanisms underlying brain function.

Details of the current QBI interdisciplinary research programs can be found at http://www.qbi.uq.edu.au.

An exciting opportunity exists for an experienced Postdoctoral Research Fellow/ Research Fellow to join the Neural Migration Laboratory at the Queensland Brain Institute. The successful applicant will be responsible for conducting research into the role of guidance receptors in the development of the vertebrate brain using the mouse as the development model.

The person Applicants must possess a PhD in a relevant field and have a strong background in molecular and/or cell biology. Demonstrated ability to bring research to publication and the ability to collaborate successfully with international researchers will be highly regarded.

Remuneration This is a full-time, fixed term appointment for an initial period of up to 3 years (renewal subject to funding and performance) at Research Academic level A or B. The remuneration package will be in the range $72,443 – $77,764 p.a. (Level A), or $81,857 – $97,205 p.a (Level B), plus employer superannuation contributions of up to 17%. Level of appointment will be commensurate with qualifications, experience and academic achievements.

Enquiries Contact A/Prof Helen Cooper on h.cooper@uq.edu.au To submit an application got to http://www.seek.com.au/job/25540987. All applicants must supply the following documents: Cover Letter and Resume. Application closing date Sunday 9 December 2013 11:55pm E. Australia Standard Time

Dear colleague,

We are pleased to announce the 1st joint meeting of the French Society for Developmental Biology (SFBD) and the network for Functional Studies on Model Organisms (EFOR), to be held at the FIAP Jean Monnet center, 75014 Paris, Feb. 10-12, 2014.

This symposium, which also stands as the annual meeting of the SFBD society and of the EFOR network, will bring together distinguished speakers around  two key developmental topics: « Cell plasticity and tissue homeostasis » and « Laterality »
 
The following speakers have confirmed their participation:

Cell Plasticity and Tissue Homeostasis:

   Andrea Brand (Univ. of Cambridge UK)

   Isabel Farinas (Univ. de Valencia, Spain)

   Uri Frank (Univ. of Ireland, Galway, Ireland)

   Cayetano Gonzalez (IRB Barcelona, Spain)

   Thomas Graf (CGR Barcelona, Spain)

   Maarten van Lohuizen (NKI Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

   Shahragim Tajbakhsh (Pasteur Institute, Paris)
 

Laterality:

   Christelle Jozet-Alves (UCBN Caen, France)

   Oliver Hobert (Columbia U., NYC, USA)

   Thierry Lepage (CNRS UPMC Villefranche sur Mer, France)

   Stéphane Noselli (IBV Nice, France)

   Frédérique Peronnet (LBD Paris, France)

   Myriam Roussigné (CBD Toulouse, France)

A significant time will be allocated to short talks selected from the submitted abstracts, and to poster sessions.

The number of participants will be limited to 200.

Organizing committee: Laure Bally-Cuif (CNRS Gif-sur-Yvette), Angela Giangrande (IGBMC Illkirch) and Myriam Roussigné (CBD Toulouse)

Information and registration: http://www.sfbd.fr/meeting2014/