“It finally got accepted!”, followed by “It’s finally out!” about a month later. I am certain this ‘finally’ feeling about their paper is very familiar to those well-acquainted with the peer review process, and it was no different for our recently published Resource article. The ‘biotagging paper’, as we call it within the Sauka-Spengler lab, is the culmination of several years’ of hard (and often frustrating) work that eventually paid off in more (unexpected) ways than one. Tatjana spearheaded the initial work for biotagging while still at Caltech, by transferring components and approaches she developed in the chicken system into the zebrafish. She worked together with Le and Tatiana, then postdoctoral fellows at Caltech, before the rest of us joined in for the lengthy optimisation, submission and review stage.
Part I: What is “biotagging”?
Biotagging is essentially an encompassing term for our Do-It-Yourself (DIY) in vivo biotinylation system for zebrafish researchers, which can be utilised in creative ways to suit specific biological needs. In vivo biotinylation was first employed in mouse (de Boer et al., 2003) by John Strouboulis when he was in Frank Grosveld’s lab and then applied for use in nuclei isolation from Arabidopsis thaliana by Roger Deal and Steven Henikoff (Deal and Henikoff, 2010). The technique was also applied to the nematode worm at around the same time (Ooi et al. 2009). The core of the technique lies in the ability of bacterial biotin ligase (BirA) to biotinylate an Avi-tagged protein-of-interest. In our binary biotagging system, the researcher decides where BirA will be expressed, which protein is Avi-tagged, and then generates transgenic lines that express these components. Crossing BirA-driver and Avi-effector heterozygous lines will give rise to ~25% of double-alleled offspring, where biotinylation of the Avi-tagged protein product only occurs in cells that also express BirA. The sky is the limit when it comes to the combinations of BirA/Avi that one can use. In the paper, we present a ‘starter’ toolkit consisting of multiple tissue-(neural crest, heart, blood) and cellular compartment-specific (ribosomes, nuclei) transgenic lines, as well as constructs to make your own lines.
Part II: Trials and Tribulations
The deconstruction (and reconstruction) of biotagging
The elegance of in vivo biotinylation means that we are not the only group to perform this method in vertebrates. For example, Michael Housley from Stainier lab (Housley et al. 2014) utilised in vivo biotinylation in zebrafish to apply the TRAP (Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification) method developed by Myriam Heiman and colleagues (Heiman et al., 2008). In vivo biotinylation experiments are not ‘difficult’ per se, but we found that obtaining a clear difference between nuclear and polyribosomal data required a remarkable amount of troubleshooting and optimisation. Our patience paid off, as this was rewarded by a wealth of information provided by a high resolution view into the migratory neural crest nascent (nuclear) and polyribosomal transcriptomes from ~200k cells.
In fact, the entire optimisation process came about by accident. In the paper, we described our surprising results when comparing the nuclear transcriptome of Sox10-positive cells at 16-18ss (migratory neural crest) to a ubiquitous control. By looking at both non-poly and polyadenylated transcripts (whole nuclear transcriptomes), our data did not yield any statistically significant neural crest-specific signature, which is what one would expect, as the enriched transcripts should be neural crest-specific. On the other hand, analysis of polyadenylated nuclear transcripts at 24hpf yielded a neural crest-specific signature. This led to further pain-staking deconstruction of our technique where, months later, we eventually came to the surprisingly simple but crucial element for the protocol to be as consistent as it is today – ensuring the complete lysis of cells (by using hypotonic buffer in excess) to release subcellular compartments into the lysate and minimise the presence of intact cell surface membranes. It is also worth noting, that a key element to the success of our protocol was the usage of an Avi-tagged chicken nuclear envelope protein, RanGAP, to label nuclei. Weirdly enough, chicken RanGAP expressed in zebrafish localised to the nuclei, but zebrafish RanGAP did not.
Having reconstructed the method, we were now eager to repeat the previous 16-18ss neural crest experiment. Imagine our initial dismay when the results were…strikingly similar. However, this was soon replaced by curiosity that drove us to carefully re-examine our results and try to figure out what IS actually going on…
Biotagging of migratory neural crest nuclei transcriptome reveals…what?
The brainstorming sessions were remarkably memorable. They were always long, often ‘lively’ as we picked at each other’s brains, and at times quite outrageous as frustrations ran high. It didn’t take us very long to notice that bidirectional transcription at non-coding regions was enriched in neural crest nuclei. However, it was a long journey after that, as we tried to quantify the phenomenon genome-wide, reproduce what we saw, believe in what we saw, and build our findings into a coherent story. Ultimately, we needed to drive home our main message – that bidirectional transcription at non-coding regions is tissue-specific, thus introducing a new method to detect active regulatory elements. These elements form the molecular signature of neural crest cells, which is traditionally based on the expression of protein-coding genes that are mainly transcription factors. We were also excited to find developmentally regulated long non-coding RNAs and transposable elements.
In short, we are proud of what we have managed to achieve with biotagging. The journey may have been long and arduous, but we have learned a lot from this project. We hope that we have provided a cool new system that includes a fully optimised tool (plasmids on Addgene) with clean protocols (available on the Resources page of our lab website), handy transgenic lines to get started with, as well as analysis pipelines tailored to biotagging datasets. Having worked out the technical intricacies of this system, this toolkit allows the zebrafish community (including us!) to study specific cellular populations in vivo on the systems level, tackling biological questions that could be important to development and disease.
The focus of training will be on construction and automation of image analysis workflows, using as examples more than one toolbox and different exercises. The schools will be held in Gothenburg 11-14th of September 2017, hosted by the Centre for Cellular Imaging – Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
NEUBIAS schools are an excellent opportunity to learn from many experts in bioimage analysis (we are expecting ~40 specialists at the event) and “….a great mix of intensive learning and community networking” (former trainee testimonial!).
applications for Gothenburg are now open (each school has 25 available seats and 10-12 trainers).
Within the COST framework, a few travel grants are offered to applicants who qualify.
Registration deadline: 26th of May, 2017 (must submit also “letter of motivation”).
Selection notification: 1st week of June 2017.
More information about schools (programme & trainers) and venue, travel & lodge available at our website (linked above).
On behalf of all NEUBIAS members, Julien Colombelli, Chair; Kota Miura, Vice-Chair Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez, Local organizer
Carolina Wählby, Jan Eglinger, Joakim Lindblad & Nuno P Martins, TS4&5 programme organizers
Gaby G Martins & Fabrice Cordelières, WG2-Training leaders
NEUBIAS is an European network of currently ~180 members and 35 countries, which aims to promote the communication between Life Scientists, Instrumentalists, Developers and BioImage Analysts and to establish and promote the role of Bioimage Analysts in Life Science. Our mission includes:
A training programme for 3 different target audiences:Early Career researcher, Facility Staff, Analyst (running until 2020 – expected 400 trainees and 15 training schools).
Promote different yearly events (NEUNIAS2020 Conference, workshops [training schools], Taggathons)
Online Resources: Repository of tools and workflows, Benchmarking and Sample datasets, Training material and Open Textbook.
A Short Term Scientific Mission mobility programme for Scientists to visit Host Labs and get in depth insights into cutting edge Image Analysis technology.
Our 20th instalment of this series comes from South Korea and features an investigation into the molecular basis of how temperature influences developmental transitions in Arabidopsis seedlings, recently published in Developmental Cell. We caught up with joint first authors Jun-Ho Ha and Hyo-Jun Lee, and their supervisor Chung-Mo Park, Professor in the Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University (SNU), to hear the story of the paper.
Jun-Ho, Hyo-Jun and Chung-Mo
Chung-Mo, can you give us your scientific biography – I understand you spent some years in the US before returning to South Korea?
CMP I am currently professor in the Department of Chemistry at SNU. I earned my Bachelor of Science in the Department of Science Education from Seoul National University in 1983 and my PhD in molecular virology from State University of New York at Buffalo in 1993 under the supervision of professor Jeremy Bruenn. The topic of my thesis work was identification of killer toxin genes in a double-stranded virus endogenously residing in Ustilago maydis, a corn smut fungus and functional and structural characterization of the killer toxin proteins. After completing my PhD, I worked as a postdoctoral researcher in the same university and the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute, Buffalo, until I joined the Kumho Life & Environmental Science Laboratory, Korea, as PI in 1996. In the Kumho Laboratory, I worked on the photochemical and photobiological characterization of phytochrome photoreceptors in higher plants and the cyanobacteria Synechocystis PCC6803 and their associated light signal transduction in photomorphogenic responses.
In 2002, I accepted an associate professor position in the Department of Chemistry, SNU, where I have been since that time. While at SNU, my research team has been working on diverse aspects of plant growth and developmental processes, such as seed germination, phase transition and flowering induction, and leaf senescence. I have also been working on plant responses to environmental stresses with emphasis on temperature extremes and drought stresses. In recent years, my research is focused on plant adaptation to high but nonstressful temperatures (warm temperatures) with emphasis on leaf hyponasty, heat dissipation from leaves, and autotrophic development.
And what is South Korea like as a place to do science?
CMP The Korean government and several biotech companies have been investing a huge amount of research fund during the last 30 years. While industrial research and development has been a priority as a potential driving force of economic growth, the Korean government is also spending heavily on basic research. In plant science, there is a national research supporting program, termed New-Generation Biogreen 21, which is organized and supported by the Korean Rural Development Administration. The Program supports various research on both model plants and crops. It is considered that although not sufficient, enthusiastic plant scientists are able to get enough research funds to perform both basic and applied researches in recent years.
fca mutant seedlings grown at different temperatures, from Figure 1, Ha, et al. 2017
Jun-Ho and Hyo-Jun – how did you come to join Chung-Mo’s lab?
JHH I earned my Bachelor of Science in chemistry. I was also interested in molecular biology with an expectation that combining chemical and biological principles would be exciting in understanding life. While I was looking for an appropriate lab for my graduate study, I met Chung-Mo Park, who is my current thesis advisor. I was greatly impressed by his passion for science and research. It was also impressive that his group is working on plant molecular biology in the Department of Chemistry. I therefore decided to join his laboratory for my graduate study.
HJL Since I was a high school student, I planned to be a scientist with an aim of discovering unknown principles of nature and living organisms. After I entered the Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, as an undergraduate student, I searched for potential labs in the Department appropriate for my research carrier. I realized that Chung-Mo’ lab is unique among the laboratories in that he is studying plant molecular biology and biochemistry. I thought that understanding molecular biological and biochemical mechanisms underlying plant performance would be helpful for me to find ways to sustain the Earth’s ecosystem. In particular, as a chemist, I thought that applying chemical tools to understanding biological systems would be interesting. I therefore decided to perform my graduate study in his lab.
Before your work, what was known about how plants respond to temperature changes during autotrophic development, and what was the key question you set out to answer?
CMP, JHH & HJL It is well known that extreme temperatures significantly affect plant performance, including autotrophic development. In addition, associated molecular events and signaling schemes are fairly well understood. In nature, the soil temperature is rapidly elevated under warm temperature conditions. Therefore, developing seedlings should cope with high temperatures while they pass through the heat-absorbing soil layer to obtain photosynthetic capacity required for autotrophic growth. However, it is almost unknown how the heat-labile shoot apical meristem tissues of developing seedlings handle the temperature constraints. It has recently been reported that warm temperatures, in a temperature range of 23 – 28oC in Arabidopsis, accelerate cell elongation during early seedling development. Thus, we were curious about whether and how warm temperatures influence chlorophyll biosynthesis during autotrophic development.
TEM images of cotyledons of 3-day-old seedlings, from Ha, et al. 2017.
Can you give us key results of the paper in a paragraph?
CMP, JHH & HJL We demonstrated that developing seedlings are capable of maintaining chlorophyll biosynthesis required for autotrophic development at warm temperature conditions. A group of photooxidoreductase (POR) enzymes is responsible for chlorophyll biosynthesis. Notably, they are susceptible to warm temperatures and thus rapidly inactivated in developing seedlings while they pass through the warm soil layer. We found that an RNA-binding protein FCA maintains the abundance of POR enzymes at warm temperatures in developing seedlings. Without FCA, plants fail to maintain the enzyme abundance, resulting in loss of chlorophyll and thus failure to achieve autotrophic growth. Our work provide a molecular basis for the acquisition of autotrophic growth under fluctuating temperature conditions in plants.
How do have any idea of what is upstream of FCA? How does it sense temperature changes?
CMP, JHH & HJL Our recent findings strongly support that the typical RNA-binding protein FCA plays a critical role through epigenetic control of target genes during high temperature responses and thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Our data also indicate that FCA sustains the thermos-stable expression of POR enzymes during autotrophic development at warm temperatures. Altogether, these observations suggest that FCA function is thermos-regulated. However, it is current unclear how FCA is activated by ambient temperatures. We found that gene transcription and protein stability of FCA are not altered by temperature changes. Its subcellular localization is also unaltered under fluctuating temperature conditions.
Our preliminary data suggest that warm temperatures activates FCA through post-translational modifications, such as protein phosphorylation. We are currently under way to examine if FCA is differentially phosphorylated or chemically modified in response to temperature changes by employing global-scale proteomics.
Singlet oxygen accumulation, from Figure 4, Ha, et al. 2017.
Do you think your work will have relevance to agriculture in a warming world?
CMP, JHH & HJL Global warming depicts the gradual elevation of the average temperature of the Earth’s climate system. It is widely documented that under high ambient temperature conditions, plants exhibit distinct morphological and developmental traits, such as accelerated hypocotyl growth, leaf hyponasty, reduction of stomatal density, and early flowering, which profoundly influence crop productivity and commercial values. Our findings on plant thermal responses are closely associated with global warming. We propose that the FCA-mediated thermal adaptation of autotrophic development allows developing seedlings to cope with the heat-absorbing soil surface layer under natural conditions. In particular, we found that a single gene mutation causes a total loss of chlorophyll biosynthesis and autotrophic development at warm temperatures, providing a way of enhancing plant adaptation to thermal fluctuations in crop agriculture.
When doing the research, did you have any particular result or eureka moment that has stuck with you?
HJL & JHH In the initial stage of the research, we germinated and grew the FCA-defective mutants at normal temperatures for 3 days before transferred to warm temperatures to see if the fca mutations affect seedling growth. However, we did not observe any phenotypic differences in seedling growth and greening patterns in the mutants. A few months later, we anticipated that the fca mutations might affect the earlier stages of seedling growth. To examine the hypothesis, we germinated and grew the mutant seedlings at 28oC. We were surprised at the albino phenotype of the mutants. This observation triggered the re-examination of the thermal phenotypes of the fca mutants, resulting in the completion of this paper.
At first, we could not figure out why the fca mutants exhibited albinism only when germinated and grown at warm temperatures. As a potential cause of the albino phenotype, we considered several possibilities, such as defects in chloroplast development, chlorophyll biosynthesis, or both. It was found that the expression of POR genes was disrupted in the fca mutants when grown at warm temperatures. Accordingly, the level of chlorophylls was extremely low in the mutants, showing that the thermo-sensitive albino phenotype of the mutants is caused primarily by defects in chlorophyll biosynthesis, consistent with the FCA-mediated stabilization of POR production.
fca seedlings grown in soil, from Figure S6, Ha, et al. 2017
And what about the flipside: any moments of frustration or despair?
HJL & JHH The FCA-defective mutants are well-known late flowering mutants. A set of transgenic fca plants expressing POR genes were required for this study. It needs a lot of time to generate the transgenic plants because it takes 3-4 months to obtain seeds from the transgenic plants. While we were generating transgenic plants, we realized that a wrong expression construct was accidentally used, spending at least 5 additional months to obtain correct transgenic plants.
We also remember the frustrating moment when temperature controllers in the culture room were out of order during last summer, when we experienced a rarely high temperature and thus unstable supply of electricity in Korea. We had to grow a full set of plants again after a period time for fixing the temperature controllers.
What are your career plans following this work?
HJL I am currently a postdoc in Chung-Mo Park’s lab. I will continue studying for a while on molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying plant thermomorphogenesis. I am interested in the as-yet unidentified regulator of POR abundance at warm temperatures. After finishing the experiments, I am planning to find an appropriate postdoc position to extend my research career in environmental control of plant proteomics.
JHH I hope to be able to finish my thesis study in a couple of years, after which I am planning to find postdoc positions in Korea or in USA to extend my research career in the field.
And what next for the Park lab?
CMP We have a well-organized research system with a variety of molecular and biochemical tools, personnel, and facilities. We are specialized in gene regulatory mechanisms with emphasis on induction and activation mechanisms of transcription factors. Using these research tools and system, we will further extend our researches on plant thermomorphogenesis, which is emerging as a hot issue in the field because of the growing concern about global warming. In particular, we are focused on the functional linkage between photomorphogenic responses and growth hormones. We are also preparing a long-term project for engineering crop plants to enhance their adaptation capacity to changing temperature environment.
Location: The Francis Crick Institute, Midland Road, London
Contract: Fixed-term (3 years), Full time
Salary: Competitive with benefits, subject to skills and experience
Vacancy ID: 5003
SHORT INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
We seek a talented and motivated postdoc to join a Research Group led by Victor Tybulewicz at the Francis Crick Institute. The Group currently consists of 12 scientists, including 6 postdocs and 4 PhD students. One of the two main research interests of the Group is the study of the genetics underlying Down Syndrome. The Group has previously generated a series of mouse models of Down Syndrome that can be used to map the location of dosage-sensitive genes that cause Down Syndrome phenotypes (Lana-Elola et al, eLife 2016).
PROJECT SCOPE/ DESCRIPTION
The postdoc will study the genetics and developmental biology underlying congenital heart defects in Down Syndrome. The overall aim is to understand how increased dosage of genes on human chromosome 21 leads to heart defects. Specifically, the project aims to identify the dosage-sensitive genes that cause heart defects when present in three copies and to elucidate the mechanism by which the genes cause pathology. The work will involve use of genetic, developmental biology and biochemical techniques including microscopy, image analysis, and RNAseq, and will be supported by the excellent core facilities of the Institute. The work is funded by the Wellcome Trust.
The Francis Crick Institute is a biomedical discovery institute dedicated to understanding the fundamental biology underlying health and disease. Its work is helping to understand why disease develops and to translate discoveries into new ways to prevent, diagnose and treat illnesses such as cancer, heart disease, stroke, infections, and neurodegenerative diseases.
An independent organisation, its founding partners are the Medical Research Council (MRC), Cancer Research UK, Wellcome, UCL (University College London), Imperial College London and King’s College London.
The Crick was formed in 2015, and in 2016 it moved into a brand new state-of-the-art building in central London which brings together 1500 scientists and support staff working collaboratively across disciplines, making it the biggest biomedical research facility under a single roof in Europe.
The Francis Crick Institute will be world-class with a strong national role. Its distinctive vision for excellence includes commitments to collaboration; to developing emerging talent and exporting it the rest of the UK; to public engagement; and to helping turn discoveries into treatments as quickly as possible to improve lives and strengthen the economy.
If you are interested in applying for this role, please apply via our website https://goo.gl/IaFC2r
The closing date for applications is 10 June at 23:30 pm.
Please note: all offers of employment are subject to successful security screening and continuous eligibility to work in the United Kingdom.
We are pleased to announce the Center for Dental, Oral, Craniofacial Tissue and Organ Regeneration (C-DOCTOR – www.c-doctor.org) RFP that will award funding to promising dental, oral and craniofacial tissue engineering and regenerative medicine technologies and help them advance toward human clinical trials through customized product development advice and core resources. Please see the full RFP below the cut or here for details – deadline June 9, 2017. We ask that you kindly distribute this RFP widely to investigators who may be interested.
Our latest monthly trawl for developmental biology (and other cool) preprints. See June’s introductory post for background, and let us know if we missed anything
And a good month for bioRxiv was also a good month for developmental biology (and related) preprints. This month we found 115 preprints covering coral regeneration, spider development, a root-on-a-chip, a lot of discussion about publishing in our ‘Research Practise’ section, and a range of stem cell and cell biology, hosted on bioRxiv, F1000Research, PeerJ and arXiv.
Auxin depletion and gene expression, from Caggiano, et al’s preprint
Cell type boundaries organize plant development. Monica Pia Caggiano, Xiulian Yu, Neha Bhatia, André Larsson, Hasthi Ram, Carolyn K Ohno, Pia Sappl, Elliot M Meyerowitz, Henrik Jönsson, Marcus G Heisler
Microtubule structures in tubulin mutant worms from Zheng, et al’s manuscript
Genetical genomics reveals Ras/MAPK modifier loci. Mark G. Sterken, Linda Van Bemmelen van der Plaat, Joost A.G. Riksen, Miriam Rodriguez, Tobias Schmid, Alex Hajnal, Jan E. Kammenga, Basten L. Snoek
Post-transcriptional regulation of adult CNS axonal regeneration by Cpeb1. Wilson Pak-Kin Lou, Alvaros Mateos, Marta Koch, Stefan Klussmann, Chao Yang, Na Lu, Stefanie Limpert, Manuel Göpferich, Marlen Zschaetzsch, Carlos Maillo, Elena Senis, Dirk Grimm, Raúl Méndez, Kai Liu, Bassem A Hassan, Ana Martin-Villalba
Some stressed out coral from Boness, et al’s preprint
Disabling Cas9 by an anti-CRISPR DNA mimic. Jiyung Shing, Fuguo Jiang, Jun-Jie Liu, Nicholas L Bray, Benjamin J Rauch, Seung Hyun Baik, Eva Nogales, Joseph Bondy-Denomy, Jacob E Corn, Jennifer A Doudna
Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Miten Jain, Sergey Koren, Josh Quick, Arthur C Rand, Thomas A Sasani, John R Tyson, Andrew D Beggs, Alexander T Dilthey, Ian T Fiddes, Sunir Malla, Hannah Marriott, Karen H Miga, Tom Nieto, Justin O’Grady, Hugh E Olsen, Brent S Pedersen, Arang Rhie, Hollian Richardson, Aaron Quinlan, Terrance P Snutch, Louise Tee, Benedict Paten, Adam M. Phillippy, Jared T Simpson, Nicholas James Loman, Matthew Loose
Improved maize reference genome with single molecule technologies. Yinping Jiao, Paul Peluso, Jinghua Shi, Tiffany Liang, Michelle C Stitzer, Bo Wang, Michael Campbell, Joshua C Stein, Xuehong Wei, Chen-Shan Chin, Katherine Guill, Michael Regulski, Sunita Kumari, Andrew Olson, Jonathan Gent, Kevin L Schneider, Thomas K Wolfgruber, Michael R May, Nathan M Springer, Eric Antoniou, Richard McCombie, Gernot G Presting, Michael McMullen, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra, R. Kelly Dawe, Alex Hastie, David R Rank, Doreen Ware
The Drosophila ventral nervous system from Court, et al’s preprint
A Systematic Nomenclature for the Drosophila Ventral Nervous System. Robert Christopher Court, James Douglas Armstrong, Jana Borner, Gwyneth Card, Marta Costa, Michael Dickinson, Carsten Duch, Wyatt Korff, Richard Mann, David Merritt, Rod Murphey, Shigehiro Namiki, Andrew Seeds, David Shepherd, Troy Shirangi, Julie Simpson, James Truman, John Tuthill, Darren Williams
CiliaCarta: An Integrated And Validated Compendium Of Ciliary Genes. Teunis J. P. van Dam, Julie Kennedy, Robin van der Lee, Erik de Vrieze, Kirsten A. Wunderlich, Suzanne Rix, Gerard W. Dougherty, Nils J. Lambacher, Chunmei Li, Victor L. Jensen, Michael R. Leroux, Rim Hjeij, Nicola Horn, Yves Texier, Yasmin Wissinger, Jeroen van Reeuwijk, Gabrielle Wheway, Barbara Knapp, Jan F. Scheel, Brunella Franco, Dorus A. Mans, Erwin van Wijk, François Képès, Gisela G. Slaats, Grischa Toedt, Hannie Kremer, Heymut Omran, Katarzyna Szymanska, Konstantinos Koutroumpas, Marius Ueffing, Thanh-Minh T. Nguyen, Stef J. F. Letteboer, Machteld M. Oud, Sylvia E. C. van Beersum, Miriam Schmidts, Philip L. Beales, Qianhao Lu, Rachel H. Giles, Radek Szklarczyk, Robert B. Russell, Toby J. Gibson, Colin A. Johnson, Oliver E. Blacque, Uwe Wolfrum, Karsten Boldt, Ronald Roepman, Victor Hernandez-Hernandez, Martijn A. Huynen
TOWARDS COORDINATED INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT OF CORE DATA RESOURCES FOR THE LIFE SCIENCES. Warwick Anderson, Rolf Apweiler, Alex Bateman, Guntram A Bauer, Helen Berman, Judith A Blake, Niklas Blomberg, Stephen K Burley, Guy Cochrane, Valentina Di Francesco, Tim Donohue, Christine Durinx, Alfred Game, Eric Green, Takashi Gojobori, Peter Goodhand, Ada Hamosh, Henning Hermjakob, Minoru Kanehisa, Robert Kiley, Johanna McEntyre, Rowan McKibbin, Satoru Miyano, Barbara Pauly, Norbert Perrimon, Mark A Ragan, Geoffrey Richards, Yik-Ying Teo, Monte Westerfield, Eric Westhof, Paul F Lasko
A postdoctoral position is immediately available to pursue cutting-edge musculoskeletal stem cell research in the laboratory of Kathryn Wagner, MD, PhD at the Center for Genetic Muscle Disorders, Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,
The Wagner laboratory is a moderate-size laboratory that focuses on translational science to develop novel therapies for muscle disorders. Approaches include small molecules, biologics, stem cells and gene therapy. The laboratory is part of a Senator Paul Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Center and has extensive collaboration both within Johns Hopkins and across institutions. https://www.thewagnerlab.org.
The ideal applicant will have a PhD in molecular or cell biology. Experience in skeletal muscle is a positive but not a requirement. This is a fully funded position to study transplantation of iPSC-derived myogenic progenitors in models of muscular dystrophy and volumetric muscle loss.
Interested applicants should send a cover letter and CV to Dr. Wagner at wagnerk@kennedykrieger.org
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, Sweden.
How cells are generated in proper numbers in order to form specific structures in an organism has been a subject of interest for many years. This issue is particularly intriguing in in the central nervous system (CNS), where the number of neurons of each type plays a crucial role in neural circuitry and cognitive capabilities in different species across evolution1. An intriguing feature of the CNS is that different regions have different cell numbers, and the number of neurons along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis seems to be organized in a wedge-like appearance: the anterior part contains more neurons than the posterior part. This overall feature of CNS organization holds true for many vertebrate and invertebrate species. So how is the generation of proper number of neurons determined in the different regions of the central nervous system? This was, and still is, one of the questions around when I joined Stefan Thor’s lab in Linkoping, and the one which we try to shed light on in this post.
The total number of cells generated in a certain region is determined by several factors: the initial number of progenitors, the number of divisions that those progenitors go through, the proliferative behavior of the daughter cells produced by progenitors, and programmed cell death (PCD) present within the lineage. Drosophila CNS is subdivided into the brain, and the ventral nerve cord (VNC), equivalent to the mammalian and spinal cord respectively. Recent studies in the Drosophila VNC have provided an essential framework for addressing how the proper number of cells are generated in each segment. First, the recent meticulous mapping of the number of neural progenitors or neuroblasts (NBs) in each of the 13 segments of the VNC 2–6; second, our previous discovery of different daughter proliferation modes in NB lineages, where NBs initially bud off daughters that divide once, to generate two neurons/glia, denoted Type I, and subsequently switch to generating daughters that do not divide, instead directly differentiating, denoted Type 0 7; third, the identification of mutants that lack PCD in embryonic stages8. These findings gave us the opportunity to make a global and systematic study of proliferation in the VNC.
With this set up, our first challenge was to establish just how different the anterior segments are from the posterior ones, and that was one of the most exciting parts in the project. The 13 segments of the VNC are generated by a similar number of progenitors, about 64 per segment, in each segment. Our cell number analysis at the end of neurogenesis revealed that these 64 NBs generate different numbers of cells in different segments, with more cells in anterior segments than posterior ones. Based upon this finding we postulated two main processes that could contribute to this wedge-like appearance: removal of excess cells, by PCD, in posterior segments, and/or increased proliferation in anterior segments. Looking at PCD mutants, the A-P differences in numbers were still noticeable, suggesting PCD could not explain the difference. In contrast, we observed increased proliferation, of both NBs and daughters, in anterior segments, which pointed to proliferation as the main contributor to the A-P differences. To further address this notion, we analyzed proliferation in specific NB lineages, serially presented in all VNC segments. Whereas in anterior segments, NBs undergo more rounds of division and display a late or absent Type I->0 daughter proliferation switch, in the posterior segments NBs undergo fewer rounds of divisions and display an earlier Type I->0 switch. The combination of cell number analysis with global and single-lineage proliferation analysis allowed us to extract an average lineage behavior for thoracic segments versus posterior segments.
Anterior-posterior differences in proliferation behavior. Anterior thoracic segment show a higher number of dividing neuroblasts (NBs) and dividing daughter cells than the posterior abdominal ones.
The next goal was to begin identifying some of the players controlling this gradient in proliferation behavior. The A-P axis differences obviously pointed to homeotic domains, and our previous work has identified the Hox gene Antennapedia (Antp) as one of the main triggers of the Type I->0 daughter proliferation switch in the thoracic segments7. Therefore, we analyzed the role of the more posteriorly acting Hox genes of the Bithorax-Complex (BX-C); Ultrabithorax (Ubx), abdominal-A (abd-A), and Abdominal-B (Abd-B). Strikingly, we indeed observed that BX-C genes were important for the earlier Type I->0 daughter proliferation switch and NB proliferation exit observed in posterior segments. However, the triggering of the Type I->0 switch during later stages of lineage progression implied that the action of BX-C was gated in a temporal manner. Our previous studies of Antp had revealed that its expression in thoracic NBs commences during later stages. Studying this, we found that although Hox genes are indeed expressed in an A-P manner during early embryonic stages, early NBs display little if any BX-C protein expression. As NBs lineage progression proceeds, we observed onset of Hox protein expression, establishing the characteristic overlapping domains along the A-P axis, and this late onset in NBs then promotes the Type I->0 daughter proliferation switch. Based upon these findings we propose a model where at early stages NBs progress in a Hox-free “ground state”, allowing for high proliferative modes, whereas at later stages, the onset of Hox expression in NBs promotes the Type I->0 daughter proliferation switch, and eventually NBs stop dividing. This action of Hox genes establishes a gradient in NB lineage size, and results in the A-P wedge appearance.
Hox-Mediated Proliferation Control along the A-P Axis in the VNC
The hypothesis of the ground state is not new in Drosophila, and has been proposed by Fernando Casares and Richard Mann for appendages9. This idea proposes a “default” program, that we believe applies also to NB proliferation behavior, in thoracic segments, which is modified along the A-P axis by the same cues that determine the body plan. This program allows for homologous NBs in different segments to modify their proliferation behavior to generate the proper number of cells needed for that specific segment.
Since Hox genes are evolutionary conserved, establishing the body plan of invertebrates and vertebrates equally, it is reasonable to envision that they may have a conserved function in proliferation control in the nervous system. Indeed, several studies have identified Hoxc6, Hoxb9 and Hoxb13 related to suppression of proliferation in the vertebrate CNS10,11. Most intriguingly, while our current study was focused on the VNC, the most obvious wedge-like appearance in nervous systems is brain size when compared to nerve cord. Given that we have shown that Hox expression suppresses neural progenitor and daughter proliferation, and that the brain is a Hox free region, it seems reasonable to think that Hox genes could be one of the motors of the evolutionary expansion of the brain.
We are now very enthusiastic about the open possibilities of what is happening in the brain. The work is now focused on addressing how proliferation is controlled in the brain, and to what extent could alternate neural progenitor and daughter cell proliferation modes be a common feature, using similar or homologous tools, to establish A-P differences across different species.
We are looking for a motivated, ambitious and collegial person interested in joining us as a postdoc to pursue projects centered around host-pathogen interaction in human stem cell derived macrophages. Prior exprience with stem cells or high throughput microscopy is required. Please contact Eva directly with your CV or with queries if you are interested.
eva.frickel@crick.ac.uk
frickellab.com
This project will dive into regulation of host immunity to infection or infectious stimuli using macrophages derived from human stem cells. More emphasis will be put on deciphering molecular signaling or cellular response pathways than the actual stimuli/infection under study. This will require efficient gene editing approaches for stem cell derived macrophages (CRISPR, siRNA) and the ability to work with high throughput analysis (image based) as well as handling large datasets (RNASeq, proteomic or metabolomic analysis). Thus I believe a person with an interest in using human stem cells to study intracellular mechanisms is best suited for this post.
Please consider visiting us in Sheffield for this exciting symposium this September (register at lifecourse.group.shef.ac.uk). The symposium is being organised by Marysia Placzek, Stephen Renshaw and David Strutt on behalf of the Bateson Centre at the University of Sheffield (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/bateson). There is an array of outstanding external speakers already confirmed and the opportunity to present your own work (abstract deadline is 15th June). Sign up by 28th July! We look forward to welcoming you to Sheffield!