The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

An interview with Patrick Tam

Posted by , on 25 November 2010

(This interview by Kathryn Senior originally appeared in Development on November 23, 2010)

Patrick Tam’s research is focused on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of body patterning during mouse development. He agreed to be interviewed by Development to talk about his interest in mouse development, new concepts in gastrulation, X-linked diseases and his dream of an African safari.

Did you always intend to have a career in developmental biology?

I was lured into science at high school as I listened to my biology teacher reminiscing about his romance with plant biochemistry during his university days. It was really no surprise that I chose biology over medicine as my degree and then headed onto postgraduate research without a second thought. It might sound incredible but there was not a proper course on developmental biology (or embryology, as it was known) in the entire Bachelor of Science curriculum of my university in those days. To fill this gap in my education, I made a definite decision to study rodent embryo development – first in Hong Kong, and later in London with Michael Snow. This was a time when research in mouse development was taking off in a big way in the UK and so the rest, as they say, is history.

What has influenced your decisions about institutions and locations?

Before I finished my PhD, I had already accepted a faculty position in the newly founded Medical School at the Chinese University in Hong Kong. Luckily, I did manage to squeeze in one year of postdoctoral training at the University of Texas at Austin. This proved to be critical for broadening my research experience and I learned a great deal more before taking on the job back home.

Joining a young institute happened to be a good decision: there were ample start-up resources and also the flexibility that I needed to be able to run the laboratory the way I wanted it. The academic appointment offered relatively stable support for my research during this formative phase of my career. The downside was coping with the demand of teaching commitments, and being the only laboratory working on mouse development made it quite hard to maintain research momentum. My next move to a research institute in Australia was a very positive one as it allowed me to develop further in a research-intensive and intellectually stimulating environment. Having access to first-rate facilities and interacting and networking with a larger community of developmental biologists enabled me to focus and move forwards much faster.

You have been a great pioneer in applying micromanipulation and embryo culture research for investigating early mouse development: how did you get into this originally?

My PhD project was to characterise the developmental fate of an active multiplying population of cells in the epiblast of the gastrulating mouse embryo. I had little idea how challenging this would turn out to be! Initially, we focused our efforts on developing a reliable whole-embryo culture method by tweaking the protocol established by Dennis New for culturing rat embryos. We then tried to apply the conventional `slash and burn’ and `cut and paste’ techniques to study cell fate and tissue differentiation. I owe Rosa Beddington an enormous debt of gratitude for introducing me to the art of embryo manipulation during my sabbatical at Oxford University in the mid 80s: my collaboration with her has had a lasting impact on my career. Ultimately, my postgraduate project evolved into a consuming exercise of fate-mapping all three germ layers and their immediate derivatives. The work took three decades but realizing that I had completed my original objective to the best of my ability was a very satisfying moment in my scientific career. (more…)

Thumbs up (4 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , ,
Categories: Interview

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

In Development this week (Vol. 137, Issue 24)

Posted by , on 23 November 2010

Pak1-ing a punch in lumen formation

The generation and maintenance of correct lumen size and shape is essential for the function of tubular organs. Now, Monn Monn Myat and co-workers report that p21-activated kinase (Pak1) plays a novel role during lumen formation in Drosophila embryonic salivary glands (see p. 4177). The researchers show that Pak1 regulates the size and elongation of the apical domain of individual epithelial cells in the developing gland by decreasing and increasing E-cadherin levels at adherens junctions and basolateral membranes, respectively. Pak1 mediates these effects, they report, through Rab5- and Dynamin-dependent endocytosis of E-cadherin. Moreover, constitutively active Pak1 induces the formation of multiple intercellular lumens in the gland, an effect that is dependent on Rab5 and Dynamin, and on the Pak1 substrate Merlin. Together, these results identify a crucial role for Pak1 and E-cadherin endocytosis in lumen size and shape determination in fly salivary glands, and highlight a mechanism for multiple lumen formation, a process that occurs in pathological conditions such as breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Shh signalling out-Foxed by cilia

Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling controls cellular differentiation in the neural tube by regulating a poorly defined gene regulatory network. To better understand this network, James Briscoe and colleagues have undertaken a genome-wide expression screen in chick neural tube and, on p. 4271, they identify the forkhead transcription factor Foxj1 as an Shh target gene in this tissue. Foxj1, they report, is expressed in the chick and mouse neural tube in cells that constitute the floor plate (FP), a neural tube organising centre. Foxj1 expression is associated with the formation of long motile cilia in several cell types and, consistent with this, the authors show that chick and mouse FP cells produce primary cilia longer than those produced elsewhere in the neural tube. Finally, they show that Foxj1 expression in the neural tube attenuates Shh signal transduction by altering cilia structure and modifying the intracellular localisation of the Gli proteins that mediate Shh signalling. Together, these data reveal a novel cilia-dependent mechanism that modulates cellular responses to Shh signalling.

Leaves send mobile signals for size

Organ size in plants and animals is tightly controlled, and partly determined, by cell size and number. Plant leaves, for example, exhibit compensation, in which defective cell proliferation triggers increased postmitotic cell expansion. Now, Hirokazu Tsukaya and colleagues (p. 4221) identify two novel pathways coordinating cell proliferation and expansion in Arabidopsis leaves. Two Arabidopsis mutants, the loss-of-function ANGUSTIFOLIA3 (AN3, a transcriptional co-activator) mutant and the overexpressor KIP-RELATED PROTEIN2 (KRP2, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) mutant show compensation: in an3 mutant leaves, cell numbers decrease by ~70%, whereas cell size increases by 50%. Using the Cre/lox system, the authors generated leaves chimeric for AN3 and KRP2 expression, and investigated whether compensation occurs in a cell-autonomous or non-cell-autonomous manner. An3-dependent compensation, they report, is indeed non-cell-autonomous and occurs via an intercellular signal restricted to one half of leaves. Conversely, compensation caused by KRP2 overexpression occurs cell-autonomously, possibly via a mitotic cell cycling defect. Future work should shed more light on these events and identify the transmitted signal.

Ongoing Phox2 locks in neuronal differentiation

During neuronal differentiation, expression of the transcription factors that determine neuronal identity often continues after their downstream genetic program has been launched. Is this continued expression required for neuronal differentiation? On p. 4211, Jean-François Brunet and colleagues address this question by inactivating the paired-like homeobox genes Phox2a and Phox2b, which specify several classes of visceral neurons, after the developmental timepoint at which they act to initiate visceral neuron differentiation. They report that ongoing Phox2b expression is required in branchiomotor and visceromotor neuronal precursors after their initial specification to maintain their molecular signature, migration pattern and cellular differentiation. Similarly, maintenance of noradrenergic neuron differentiation during embryogenesis requires the ongoing expression of Phox2b in sympathetic ganglia and of Phox2a in the main noradrenergic centre of the developing brain. Thus, neuronal differentiation does not always unfold as a transcriptional ‘cascade’ in which downstream events are irreversibly triggered by an upstream regulator. Instead, as seen here, it sometimes requires continuous input from so-called ‘terminal selector genes’.

Hippo links growth control to tissue homeostasis

Both tissue repair and tissue homeostasis require stem cells that proliferate to replenish lost cells, but the way in which adult stem cells respond to damage and switch between homeostatic and rapid proliferative states is not well understood. In the Drosophila midgut, intestinal stem cells (ISCs) maintain homeostasis, and, in response to damage, can proliferate rapidly following activation of the Jak/Stat pathway. In this issue, two papers demonstrate that Drosophila ISC proliferation, and hence intestinal regeneration, are regulated by the Hippo (Hpo) tumour suppressor pathway, providing an exciting new link between growth control and stem cell proliferation.

On p. 4147, Nicolas Tapon and colleagues examine the effects of Hpo pathway inactivation in the midgut by overexpressing Yorkie (Yki), a progrowth target that is usually repressed by the Hpo pathway. They report that Yki overexpression in differentiated cells increases ISC proliferation non-cell-autonomously without affecting differentiation, and induces the expression of the Jak/Stat pathway ligand Unpaired. The authors also observe that Yki target genes are induced by bacterial infection, and suggest that the Hpo pathway acts to sense cellular stress within the midgut. Finally, using RNAi, they show that Yki is also required within ISCs to drive proliferation in response to bacterial-induced tissue stress. Based on their findings, they propose that the Hpo pathway is a mediator of the Drosophila midgut regenerative response.

In a second, related paper, Norbert Perrimon and co-workers (p. 4135) demonstrate that Yki overexpression in ISCs induces proliferation cell-autonomously, whereas Yki loss has no effect on ISCs during normal homeostasis. They also show that Yki activity is required in ISCs to mediate the proliferative response to tissue damage, and propose that this effect is elicited by downstream targets that are involved in proliferation and survival. Importantly, they report that, prior to tissue damage, Yki is also repressed by the atypical cadherins Fat and Dachsous, which are upstream components of the Hpo pathway. From their findings, the researchers propose that Yki is inactive under normal homeostasis but becomes activated to induce ISC proliferation when cell-contact cues, and thus Hpo signal transduction, are disrupted by tissue injury.

Also…

Germline segregation in metazoans can occur during or after embryogenesis and often involves a common set of genes. Juliano, Swartz and Wessel now propose that this gene set represents a conserved germline multipotency programme operating in germ cells and multipotent progenitors.

See the Hypothesis article on p. 4113

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Research

V International Meeting of the LASDB

Posted by , on 20 November 2010

Being at the end of the planet Earth and organizing an international meeting is not easy. Even harder is to prepare and hold a course intended for an international audience. But the organizing committee of the Fifth International Meeting of the Latin American Society for Developmental Biology, together with the Society for Developmental Biology, managed to make both events possible, with an outstanding response from students and researchers.

First, it was developed the short course entitled “Concepts and Model Organisms in Regenerative Biology”, in Santiago, Chile. The course was composed by theoretical and practical sessions, focused on the regenerative abilities of model organisms, and expert  researchers were invited as speakers and to show to the students about the techniques used in the model organisms of their expertise area. Some invited scientist were Brigitte Galliot, Richard Behringer, Panagiotis Tsonis, Katia del Rio-Tsonis, Alejandro Sánchez-Alvarado, José García-Arrarás and others. The enormous effort and patience of these researchers, together with the incredible amount of work of the local organizing committee (specially Juan Larraín, Miguel Concha and Miguel Allende) made possible the success of this experience.

The course was followed by the meeting in Santa Cruz, a small town in a part of Chile located in the center of the country, known by its vineyards, wine and the nice climate. The reception opening consisted in a walk by the local museum, which has interesting collections, including one of the biggest amber collection with animal and vegetal fossils preserved inside them, and fossils from the ancient fauna in Chile. After the visit to the Museum, a cocktail with chilean wine was waiting for all the students and researchers. The following was simply a success: five days of excellent talks and poster sessions. We enjoyed the presence and talks of Janet Rossant, Allan Spradling, Claudio Stern, Edward de Robertis, Carl Phillip Heisenberg, Roberto Mayor, John Wallingford, Joachim Wittbrodt, Kenneth Poss, Jonathan Slack, the speakers invited to the course and many more. The poster sessions were very exciting; the wine made easy to share and talk with the authors. Personally, the meeting was a complete success, considering that almost eight months ago, the fifth most powerful earthquake in recorded history happened in Chile (actually, Santa Cruz is located in one of the regions of Chile most affected by the earthquake, remembered also by Cristian Undurraga here at The Node, in this post), and also considering the long distance travelled by many of the attendees and the almost two weeks that some of the invited speakers (participating in the short course) stayed in Chile.

I uploaded some pictures of the meeting. It is necessary to mention that all of this success was possible with the outstanding work of many people, including Ida Chow from the SDB.  Please enjoy the pictures, and those of you that attended the meeting and/or the course, please fell free to comment and share your experience.

Thumbs up (3 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Events, News

A win for Developmental Biology in Japan

Posted by , on 19 November 2010

Science is held pretty highly in Japan. The country has produced 15 Nobel Prize winners in the science disciplines, including two in the field of chemistry this year. But perhaps a little less in the international press’ limelight is Dr. Yoshiki Sasai, winner of the Osaka Science Prize. This honor is like the Japanese version of a science-biased Oscar for local scientists and is awarded each year to a person who has made a major contribution to physical science, engineering, agriculture, biology, medicine, pharmacology or information science by helping to advance scientific understanding and developing new technology. And this year the prestigious honor has been awarded to a developmental biologist.

Yoshiki Sasai
Yoshiki Sasai, winner of the Osaka Science Prize

Sasai is a Group Director in the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, a visiting professor at the National Institute of Physiological Sciences and an affiliated professor at Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine. Adding to this impressive resume, Sasai was also a visiting professor at Lund University Faculty of Medicine and a research fellow at UCLA School of Medicine.

He was awarded with the Osaka Science Prize for his work in the analysis of organizational principles in brain development. His particular interest of research lies in understanding how the complexity of the fully-formed brain arises from a nondescript clump of cells in the embryo by studying very early neurogenesis and the mechanisms of neuronal differentiation.

It is heartening to know that developmental biologists are being recognized worldwide. It can, of course, only be a good thing.

Thumbs up (6 votes)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: News

3rd Latin America Course in ES cells and Development

Posted by , on 19 November 2010

The 3rd Latin America Course on ES cells and Development will be in Cuernavaca, Mexico. It provides extensive hands-on experience and an incredible line-up of speakers. The course can take up to 8 UK PhD students, post-docs, or young investigators, and it is fully funded. Please visit:

http://www.escellslatinamerica.org/

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: ,
Categories: Events

SDB at the USA Science and Engineering Festival

Posted by , on 18 November 2010

The Society for Developmental Biology participated in the first USA Science and Engineering Festival held October 10-24, 2010 in Washington, DC.  SDB sponsored four separate events throughout the festival in an effort to share the field of developmental biology with the community.  This included a teacher workshop based on the BioEYES K-12 science education program, Nifty Fifty speaker Marnie Halpern who spoke at a Maryland high school, a public lecture featuring Nobel laureates Eric Wieschaus and Martin Chalfie with Alexandra Joyner and Mary Dickinson at the Carnegie Institution, and a 2-day Expo on the National Mall in Washington, DC.

Visitors to the SDB expo booth were able to observe live developing frog and zebrafish embryos, color masks of their favorite model organisms, and participate in the Evolution Thought Trail exercise on the homology of the vertebrate forelimb.  There was an overwhelming excitement from students, parents, teachers, and scientists to participate in future science festivals.

Thumbs up (2 votes)
Loading...

Tags: ,
Categories: Events, News, Outreach

2010 Gairdner Awards

Posted by , on 17 November 2010

The Gairdner Awards is Canada’s foremost international award, recognizing medical researchers for their work which has contributed significantly to improving quality of life.  There are five awardees each year and 76 of the 298 Gairdner awardees to date have gone on to win the Nobel Prize.

Lectures celebrating scientific excellence in medical research take place across Canada during the third week of October and culminate in Toronto with the Gairdner Awards lectures.  This year in Toronto, the Gairdner lectures kicked off on October 27 with an afternoon of lectures focusing on the eradication of malaria.  On the final day of the lectures, October 29, the Gairdner Symposium was held, highlighting research in epigenetics and genome function.

On October 28, sandwiched between the two outstanding sets of seminars was the main event – the annual Minds that Matter symposium with lectures by the 2010 Gairdner Awards recipients. The 2010 Gairdner International Laureates are:
Dr. William Catterall for the discovery of the voltage-gated sodium channel and calcium channel proteins and the elucidation of their function and regulation
Dr. Pierre Chambon for the elucidation of fundamental mechanisms of transcription in animal cells and the discovery of the nuclear receptor superfamily
Dr. William Kaelin, Dr. Peter Ratcliffe, and Dr. Greg Semenza each for his work in the identification of molecular mechanisms of oxygen sensing in the cell

Also giving lectures were the Wightman and Global Health Laureates.  Dr. Calvin Stiller is the 2010 Canada Gairdner Wightman Laureate, being recognized as a pioneer in organ transplant and diabetes research as well as an innovator in the Canadian biotech industry.  Dr. Nicholas White is the 2010 Canada Global Health Laureate for his research in the effectiveness of artemesinins in the treatment of malaria and elucidating the basis for the use of ACT to prevent resistance.

This year’s lectures covered topics from molecular biology to epidemiology, highlighting the importance of medical research in all fields of biology and health care.  The Gairdners will, no doubt, continue to bring to the forefront significant advances in medical research.

Thumbs up (2 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , ,
Categories: Research

Rock Stars of Science

Posted by , on 17 November 2010

Glamour, fame, red carpets, flashing lights. It’s not what you usually get as a top scientist, but why not? Why should overnight reality TV stars get more attention than people who spent years researching how the world works? This lack of attention to the important role of scientists was a driving force behind the second annual “Rock Stars of Science” campaign. Men’s glossy magazine GQ is giving 17 researchers the glamour treatment: designer fashion, meeting rock stars, and a multi-page spread in their December 2010 issue.

Posing on the first page of the feature (shown above) are TGF-β scientist Joan Massagué, cancer researcher Craig B. Thompson, and 2009 Lasker winner Charles Sawyers. Dressed to the nines, and giving the camera an ice-cold glare, they’re accompanied by Debbie Harry of Blondie fame. A few pages further is another memorable sight: Nobel Laureates Phil Sharp (sporting a leather jacket) and Liz Blackburn (almost unrecognizable without glasses), together with Anne and Nancy Wilson of Heart:

Other musicians who were happy to pose with scientists in the GQ photo spread are Timbaland, Keri Hilson, Bret Michaels, B.o.B, and Jay Sean, who himself once studied medicine in London: “I was halfway through my degree; it’s when my first record deal presented itself… But I’ll always be a fan of science.”

With surveys showing that many people in the US are unable to name a single living scientists, GQ and the philanthropic Geoffrey Beene foundation hope that the Rock Stars of Science campaign will improve the image of science by profiling its stars. There is no attempt to explain any of the research – just like a photo spread of an actor or musician wouldn’t try to analyze their work. It’s just scientists being shown as, and with, rock stars, to make them look cool and hopefully get people interested in the researchers and the work they do.

The campaign is also supported by a website with profiles of the scientists. Elsewhere online, science writer Chris Mooney, who was involved with the campaign, looks back at the first installment of the photo spread last year. He reveals what happened to the scientists who participated in 2009, and why posing with rock stars may just be the only way for researchers to get through to the public.

The full list of scientists featured in the 2010 Rock Stars of Science campaign:
Stephen B. Baylin, Elizabeth H. Blackburn, Susan J. Blumenthal, Geraldine Dawson, Frank L. Douglas, Bernard A. Harris, Catriona Jamieson, Emil Kakkis, Frank M. Longo, Joan Massagué, Mehmet Oz, Eric M. Reiman, Phillip A. Sharp, Charles L. Sawyers, Craig B. Thompson, Mehmet Toner, Michael W. Weiner

Jealous? Keep up the research, and maybe one day it will be you rubbing shoulders with musicians in a glossy photo shoot.

(Image credit: Kurt Iswarienko)

Thumbs up (6 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , ,
Categories: Images, News

Cell death – the video

Posted by , on 12 November 2010

Cold Spring Harbor has just published a new book on cell death by Doug Green, a larger-than-life character who will be familiar to anyone who’s ever been to an apoptosis conference. In this video, Doug talks about the apoptosis machinery and explains why cell death is critical during development.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Video

Student associations

Posted by , on 11 November 2010

I’m Nish, a 3rd year PhD student in Kate Storey’s lab at the University of Dundee. Over the past year, I’ve been involved in running PiCLS, the PhD association here at the College of Life Sciences in Dundee. Unfortunate acronyms aside, it has the most interesting year of my PhD so far. I thought I’d write a bit about my experiences with PiCLS, hopefully to encourage other students to be part of something similar and maybe even getting other academics thinking about supporting students taking part as well.

To give you a bit of background about PiCLS, it was started in late 2008 by a group of students who had been organising various student events like retreats and decided to form an official organisation for students with support from the college. The aim of this organisation was to help students from different fields network. Dundee may be a small place, but with students working in the lab late hours and sometimes in unsociable labs, it can be difficult to meet other students and socialise with them.

Also, more importantly, it gave students a voice in important decisions made by the College. As PhD students aren’t contracted employees but are often treated as such, it is important that we are heard.

I joined the PiCLS board in its 2nd year. The previous board had established PiCLS in the College of Life Sciences quite well, organising workshops, seminars, a ceilidh (a Scottish dance – some of you may remember the one at this year’s BSDB/BSCB meeting in Warwick) and retreats and we wanted to take this further. As well as academic seminars, we organised career seminars, more social events like pub nights and sports competitions between departments. We even put together a symposium where we invited students from across the country and some big names from different fields to give talks like Matthias Mann, Susan Gasser and Seth Grant.

I learnt a lot in my year on the PiCLS board. I found out a lot about how institutes like the College of Life Sciences are run; especially the logic behind some of the decisions made that at first don’t seem right. I also appreciate how hard it is to organise a symposium/conference. We were very lucky in that we had the expertise of many people who had organised conferences in Dundee at our disposal.

Above all, I had a great lot of fun being part of this society. I got to do some really interesting things that most PhDs haven’t done and I got to know a lot of new people in the process, not just students and academics. It also helped build contacts that may be useful later in my career. These contacts are also useful if you want to consider forging a career outside of science, something that a lot of us students should consider, especially in these testing time. If anyone gets the chance to start up or join a PhD society, I would strongly recommend they take it.

I may have some bias in this statement, being part of PiCLS, but when I think about the things we achieved and the feedback we’ve been given, I hope that every institute thinks about supporting a PhD student society.

In the spirit of social networking, here is a link to our Facebook page with photos and details of events – http://tinyurl.com/38uj5ko.

Thumbs up (4 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Careers, Education, Lab Life