The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

This month on the Node

Posted by , on 11 November 2016

A roundup of the Node’s highlights from October 2016. 

 

preprints

 

October’s most discussed post came from Development’s Executive Editor Katherine Brown, who reported from a workshop on preprints in Cambridge and gave a journal’s perspective on the promises and challenges of preprinting. The comments section is worth reading, as is this recent post from the organiser of the workshop, Alfonso Martinez-Arias.

 

michaux-et-al-fig-1c

We also continued our regular round up of preprints in developmental biology: September featured cell mechanics, cell divisions, and mesoderm development.

 

ImageJ=1.45b

We  heard from the DMDD about their latest screen into the genetics of neonatal death in mice, and from the IRB about the 18th Barcelona Biomedical Conference focussing on the insights developmental biology can give into pathology. Development’s sister journal Disease Models & Mechanisms announced a Special Collection all about rats.

 

img_1179

I reported from Development’s meeting on human development and stem cells (and included jittering scientists and some optical heritage), and the BSDB reported from their Autumn Meeting on the use of chimeras in developmental biology.

 

joe-matt

Finally, we heard from Matthew Towers and Joseph Pickering, authors of a recent Development paper on digit patterning in the chick.

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Highlights

Navigate the archive

Here you can filter posts by date, category or popular tags.  You can also use the search box.

Search Posts

Filter by date

Filter by category

Physical Biology of Stem Cells MRC 4-Year PhD Programme in Stem Cell Biology & Medicine

Posted by , on 10 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

stem-cells-logo

Is this you?:

  • Physical Sciences, Mathematical Sciences or Computational Sciences background?
  • Interested in applying your training to aspects of Stem Cell Biology?
  • Passion for scientific research & hold (or expect to) a relevant 1st degree at the highest level?

 

If so, the Cambridge Stem Cell Institute would like to hear from you.

 

To find out more and apply, please visit:
http://www.stemcells.cam.ac.uk/study/physical-biology

Application Deadline: 6 February 2017 

wellcome-logo-black        mrc-logo       university-of-cambridge-logo

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

From our sister journals – October 2016

Posted by , on 10 November 2016

Here we highlight some developmental biology related content from other journals published by The Company of Biologists.


 

Journal typography

roque

Helio Roque and colleagues describe that flies lacking MKS, a component of the transition zone in cilia, show abnormalities during development, but not in the adult.

 

liu

Hua Liu and  Ken-Ichi Nonomura describe large scale chromatin remodelling in meiosis I of rice mediated by the Argonaute protein MEL1

 

devos

In their Commentary, Damien Devos and colleagues explore changing concepts in the emergence of eukaryotic cells, and in his Editorial, Editor-in-Chief Michael Way announces a forthcoming special issue on plants

 

CoB_DisModMech_AW_RGB

DMM025874*009-11*cov.sugg

Gabrielle Kardon and colleagues show that TBX3 is responsible for specifying a subset of forelimb muscles, and their attachment to tendons.

 

spot

Nicholas Pilon and colleagues describe how a mouse line found in a screen for genes involved in neural crest development provides a model for Waardenburg syndrome type 4.

 

bingle

Colin Bingle and colleagues develop an in vitro model of the murine middle ear epithelium, recapitulating cell populations and protein production.

 

cagan

In his Editorial, Senior Editor Ross Cagan gives some tips for those wanting to conduct drug screening in model systems

 

CoB_BioOpen_AW

rooij

Johan de Rooij and colleagues disrupted αE-catenin function in developing zebrafish, and found that specifically disrupting αE-catenin mechnotransduction leads to defective convergence and extension.

 

volk

Elly Ordan and Talila Volk describe how Amontillado, the Drosophila homologue of pheremone convertase 2, cleaves Slit to promote muscle patterning.

 

stress

Ernesto Maldonado and colleagues show that zebrafish mutants lacking stress granules have developmental abnormalities and respond poorly to stress.

 

Journal typography

Manfred Schartl and colleagues explore how the fish genome adapts to abrupt ploidy change by allele silencing.

 

Karl Gotthard and colleagues explore how butterflies regulate energy and lipid metabolism during diapause.

 

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Highlights

Intern for Disease Models & Mechanisms

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

cob_dismodmech_aw_rgb

 

DMM is looking for an enthusiastic intern who wishes to gain experience in science publishing, including writing press releases, contributing to our social media activities, and supporting our Reviews Editor with commissioned articles. The internship is envisaged to last for 9 months at a salary of £20,000 per annum pro rata.

Our interns have a great track record of continuing on into important publishing roles.

Joining an experienced and successful team, the internship offers an ideal opportunity to gain in-depth experience on a growing Open Access journal in the exciting and fast-moving field of translational research. DMM publishes primary research articles and a well-regarded front section, including commissioned reviews and poster articles, thought-provoking editorials and interviews with leaders in the field. We also have an active social media presence and will be growing our press release programme. The intern will work alongside an established publishing team in our Cambridge offices.

Because the journal serves both basic biomedical researchers and clinicians, applicants will have a PhD or MD, ideally with some relevant research experience, and a broad knowledge of model organisms and disease issues.

Is the role for you? You would be expected to…

Support our Reviews Editor:
• Identify and commission topical front-section content from top-ranking scientists, see articles through peer review and work closely with authors to finalise articles for publication.
• Travel to international scientific conferences and research institutes, representing the journal, keeping abreast of the latest research and making contacts in the DMM community.

Develop your own areas of activity:
• Spot newsworthy articles, write informative press releases and handle any media enquiries.
• Interview high-profile scientists in the biomedical arena.
• Contribute to our social media output.
• Be creative – contribute other ideas for the journal’s development and promotion.

Essential requirements for the job are enthusiasm, commitment, judgement and integrity. Candidates should have excellent interpersonal skills and confidence, excellent oral and written communication skills, and a broad interest in research and the research community. They should also be willing to travel. Previous editorial experience is not required, but we would expect candidates to be able to demonstrate an interest in scientific communication.

For details on how to apply, go to: http://www.biologists.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/DMM-Intern.pdf

DEADLINE FOR APPLICATIONS: 30TH NOVEMBER 2016

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Jobs

Embryogenesis Explained

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Gordon, N.K. & R. Gordon (2016). Embryogenesis Explained. Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Company. xxiii+759pp., 431 illustrationlogowordss. http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/8152
https://www.amazon.com/Embryogenesis-Explained-Natalie-K-Gordon/dp/9814350486/ref=mt_hardcover?_encoding=UTF8&me=

Here’s the Table of Contents:

Chapter 1: How Embryogenesis Began in Evolution
Chapter 2: Developmental Anatomy of the Axolotl
Chapter 3: Developmental Genetics: A Flying Tour
Chapter 4: Epigenetics: Higher Order Gene
Control
Chapter 5: The Cytoskeleton
Chapter 6: The Cell State Splitter and Differentiation Waves
Chapter 7: The Differentiation Tree and the Fate Map of the Axolotl
Chapter 8: Signal Transduction from the Cell State Splitter to the Nuclear State Splitter
Chapter 9: The Nuclear State Splitter
Chapter 10: Irritable Protoplasm: Forerunners to Differentiation Waves
Chapter 11: Why Evolution is Progressive
Chapter 12: Wholeness and the Implicate Embryo: Embryogenesis as Self-Construction of the Observer
Index

Contact: DickGordonCan@gmail.com

Yes, this is a book announcement, not a review. Please contact me with the venue if you would like to publish a proper, arm’s length book review.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Book Reviews, News

A Day in the Life of a Coral Lab

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Hi, I’m Yuuri Yasuoka, a postdoc in the Marine Genomics Unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST). Okinawa is a subtropical Japanese island surrounded by beautiful coral reefs (Figure 1). Why do we study coral here? OIST is the best place in Japan to study coral, with the good access to wild coral reefs and advanced research facilities for molecular biology.

 

Figure 1

Figure 1. Beautiful coral reefs in Okinawa. (A) An ocean view from OIST. (B) Acropora community at Ishigaki Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan (Photo: Yuna Zayasu).

 

How important is it to study corals?

Coral reefs are one of the most biodiverse ecosystems in the world, and are believed to support roughly 25% of all marine species (Knowlton et al., 2010). In addition, they are also important for the local Okinawan economy, as fisheries and tourist attractions. Therefore, our unit, led by Prof. Noriyuki Satoh, has been studying coral genetics to understand coral ecosystems at the molecular level. In 2011, our group reported the first draft genome of a stony coral, Acropora digitifera (Shinzato et al., 2011). This species is very common in Okinawa (Figure 2A). Using the genome database, we can now address many biological questions concerning corals that were impossible to answer previously.

 

Corals occupy an important phylogenetic position when it comes to understanding evolution of metazoan body plans. Corals belong to the Phylum Cnidaria, which also includes sea anemones, hydras, and jellyfishes. It forms a sister group to the Bilateria. Although most cnidarians are marine organisms, the most widely used experimental model cnidarians, Hydra and Nematostella, are very tiny freshwater and brackish water animals. While corals are a primitive clade of cnidarians that diverged from sea anemones ~500 Mya, they are one of the most successful cnidarian groups (Shinzato et al., 2011). Thus, coral studies tell us much about conserved ancestral features of cnidarian body plans. Recently, we published a research paper analyzing molecular functions of the brachyury gene in coral embryos (Yasuoka et al., 2016). Because cnidarians lack mesoderm and because brachyury functions as a mesoderm-forming gene in vertebrates, this study sheds light on evolutionary origins of vertebrate mesoderm.

Next, I will discuss the most exciting day in a coral lab. That occurs when corals spawn.

 

Coral spawning

It is generally believed that corals spawn once per year under a full moon; however, in reality it is not that simple in Okinawa. First, spawning is totally unpredictable. It ranges from one week before a full moon to two weeks after. For spawning experiments, we collect 5-10 wild coral colonies about two weeks before experiments and keep them in seaside aquaria. Every night, we check them to see whether they show signs of spawning. This is called “bundle setting,” as corals produce red or orange bundles of gametes near the mouths of their polyps (Figure 2B). In Acropora digitifera, this occurs at approximately 8 pm, and the colony starts to spawn at around 10 pm (Figure 2C). Interestingly, another Acropora species, A. tenuis starts to spawn at around 8 pm. The spawning time differs between species, but it is very precise.

 

Figure 2

Figure 2. Coral spawning. (A) Acropora digitifera colonies in shallow water at Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan. (B) “Bundle setting” of Acropora tenuis (Photo: Yuna Zayasu). (C) Acropora digitifera colonies that are spawning.

 

Second, the spawning day is highly variable, depending on location and local conditions. Acropora species spawn during May and June. Usually, corals in the Yaeyama Islands, which are located in southwestern Okinawa Prefecture, spawn one month earlier than at Okinawa Island. Even around the same island, the spawning day differs between locations. In fact, among our colonies in aquaria, collected at the same location, not all colonies spawned on the same night. Furthermore, we have observed that some colonies spawn twice in one season. Thus, there are many challenges in obtaining coral gametes, but with considerable experience, we have become quite successful.

Movie 1. Spawning of Acropora digitifera.

 

Microinjection of coral eggs

If we were not coral researchers, we would be satisfied just to be able to observe the beautiful and mysterious spawning of corals (Movie1). However, after spawning occurs we have to do our experiments. Acropora corals spawn bundles that contain both eggs and sperm. After bundles float to the water surface, the surrounding membrane ruptures to release eggs and sperm. Because they do not self-fertilize, we collect bundles from different individuals separately to perform in vitro fertilization (Figure 3A). After collecting bundles from seaside aquaria, we bring them to the lab at OIST by car; it takes ~15 min. When they arrive at the lab, the collecting tubes include an orange egg layer on the surface and white sperm solution (Figure 3B,C). To fertilize the eggs, we mix eggs and sperm from different individuals. In our experience, Acropora gametes can actively fertilize at least as much as 5 hours after spawning. Thus, we can obtain synchronously developing embryos at 30 min ~ 1 hour intervals.

 

Figure 3

Figure 3. Gamete bundles of Acropora. (A) Collection of gamete bundles from each spawning individual separated in buckets at Sesoko Marine Station of the University of Ryukus, 2012. (B) Eggs and sperm separated in a collecting tube. (C) Magnified image of bundles containing both eggs and sperm.

 

We start microinjections 30 min after fertilization. Because Acropora eggs are very yolky and float on sea water, we had to develop a method to immobilize them (Figure 4). First, fertilized Acropora eggs are positioned between glass capillaries attached to a glass slide. Next, sea water is removed as much as possible, resulting in deformation of embryos due to the surface tension of the remaining water. Then, we inject antisense morpholinos into immobilized embryos to inhibit functions of specific genes. After microinjection, embryos are returned to sea water where they develop normally. Usually, I inject 100-200 embryos from a single batch for each type of morpholino; this takes 30-45 min. When I finish an experiment for several kinds of morpholino, it is usually 3:00-4:00 am. After microinjection experiments, I drive home with tired eyes. Injected embryos are sorted based upon fluorescence of injected materials and used for further experiments.

 

After numerous trials and errors, I developed this method and completed the first analysis of gene functions during coral development (Yasuoka et al., 2016). Because we can do experiments using coral embryos only once per year, it took five years to publish the paper.

 

Figure 4

Figure 4. Microinjection experiments of coral eggs. (A) Equipment for coral egg microinjection. (B) Schematic of our microinjection method. (C) Acropora embryos aligned between glass capillaries. (D) A photo seen with a stereomicroscope, showing embryos are deformed and retained by the surface tension.

 

Future perspective of coral studies

One of the biggest concerns about coral reef ecosystems is “coral-bleaching.” Inside their cells, corals possess symbiotic algae (Symbiodinium), on which they depend for photosynthetic products. If corals suffer severe stresses, such as high temperature, acidification, or oxidation, the symbiotic relationship collapses and corals bleach and die. Coral bleaching is an increasingly serious problem around the world, due to global climate change. However, the genetic basis of this symbiosis is largely unknown. In 2013, our lab also decoded the genome of a species of Symbiodinium (Shoguchi et al., 2013). Using the microinjection technique, now we are trying to determine the molecular mechanisms underlying coral-bleaching.

 

References

Knowlton, N., Brainard, R. E., Fisher, R., Moews, M., Plaisance, L., & Caley, M. J. (2010). Coral reef biodiversity. Life in the World’s Oceans: Diversity Distribution and Abundance, 65-74.

Shinzato, C., Shoguchi, E., Kawashima, T., Hamada, M., Hisata, K., Tanaka, M., Fujie, M., Fujiwara, M., Koyanagi, R., Ikuta, T., Fujiyama, A., Miller, D. J., & Satoh, N. (2011). Using the Acropora digitifera genome to understand coral responses to environmental change. Nature, 476(7360), 320-323.

Shoguchi, E., Shinzato, C., Kawashima, T., Gyoja, F., Mungpakdee, S., Koyanagi, R., Takeuchi, T., Hisata, K., Tanaka, M., Fujiwara, M., Hamada, M., Seidi, A., Fujie, M., Usami, T., Goto, H., Yamasaki, S., Arakaki, N., Suzuki, Y., Sugano, S., Toyoda, A., Kuroki, Y., Fujiyama, A., Medina, M., Coffroth, M. A., Bhattacharya, D., & Satoh, N. (2013). Draft assembly of the Symbiodinium minutum nuclear genome reveals dinoflagellate gene structure. Current Biology, 23(15), 1399-1408.

Yasuoka, Y., Shinzato, C., & Satoh, N. (2016). The mesoderm-forming gene, Brachyury, regulates ectoderm-endoderm demarcation in the coral, Acropora digitifera. Current Biology, 26(21), 2885-2892.

Thumbs up (7 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , ,
Categories: Lab Life, Research

Postdoctoral position-Mansour Laboratory-University of Utah

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

My laboratory in the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Utah has an open position for a postdoctoral fellow to work on NIH-funded projects involving FGF signaling in auditory sensory and supporting cell differentiation in the mouse. The ideal candidate should have at least two years of graduate or postdoctoral research experience in perinatal/postnatal inner ear development, including anatomic, molecular and functional analyses, with strong publications (can be pending) in these areas, but I also welcome applicants with strong experience in other developing sensory systems. Stipend will follow NIH guidelines and the fellow will be mentored through the process of applying for individual support (stipend and/or newly developed project) as appropriate. In addition, presentation and networking opportunities include participation in the weekly Human Genetics Research in Progress series and the monthly Inner Ear Research Group, which comprises multiple labs with diverse interests.

 

E-mailed inquiries to Suzanne Mansour (suzi.mansour@genetics.utah.edu) should include a brief (<1 page) current research description, a Biosketch, and the names and contact information of two individuals (current PI and one other), who can be contacted to comment on your suitability for this position. The ideal candidate would be able to start in early 2017.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Journal Website Content Manager

Posted by , on 7 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

cob_logo_aw_rgb

 

 

 

 

 

Journal Website Content Manager

Based in Cambridge, UK

 

We are creating an exciting new role to enhance the community content on our journal websites.

 

We publish five important journals that serve the biological research community. All have effective publishing platforms and a good social media presence. We now seek to extend our community engagement, raise awareness of our charitable activities and build connections with early career scientists.

 

We are looking for an enthusiastic and motivated team player to support us in this initiative, which is initially planned as a 2—3 year project to determine future directions. Working with experienced editorial teams, you will have the opportunity to develop content for the journal websites that appeals to our communities. We are open to new creative ideas.

 

Core responsibilities include:

  • Engaging the scientific community through the journal websites.
  • Generating more dynamic content, including writing short pieces to draw in a broad audience.
  • Measuring usage and online behaviours to assess and guide strategies.
  • Working with the journal teams on other community engagement content such as social media and video interviews.
  • Seeking opportunities to actively engage early career scientists.
  • Identifying opportunities within an evolving engagement strategy.
  • Diplomatic and collaborative liaison with multiple teams, balancing their needs as we develop cross-title projects.

 

The successful applicant will have:

  • Research experience in the biological sciences, ideally a PhD in a field relevant to one or more of our journals.
  • Experience with community engagement such as blogging, social media or outreach.
  • A strong understanding of the opportunities presented by the online environment.
  • Excellent and proven writing skills.
  • Web skills would be an advantage (creating and editing webpages, CMS).

 

With an attractive salary, this is an exciting opportunity to work on prominent and highly successful journals within a well-established publishing company. The role is based in our attractive modern offices on the outskirts of Cambridge, UK.

 

The Company of Biologists (biologists.com) exists to support biologists and inspire advances in biology. At the heart of what we do are our five specialist journals – Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology, Disease Models & Mechanisms and Biology Open – two of them fully open access. All are edited by expert researchers in the field, and all articles are subjected to rigorous peer review. We take great pride in the experience of our editorial team and the quality of the work we publish. We believe that the profits from publishing the hard work of biologists should support scientific discovery and help develop future scientists. Our grants help support societies, meetings and individuals. Our workshops and meetings give the opportunity to network and collaborate.

 

To apply, please send your CV by email to recruitment[at]biologists.com along with a covering letter that states your current salary, summarises your relevant experience and explains why you are enthusiastic about this opportunity. You must be able to demonstrate your entitlement to work in the UK.

 

Applications should be made as soon as possible and by 4th December (late applicants may be considered)

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

From biology to art

Posted by , on 4 November 2016

At the BSDB’s  Autumn Meeting on chimeras, scientist and artist Mia Buehr exhibited some of her art inspired by developmental biology. Here, she introduces her pieces. You can keep up with her work at theaccidentalembroiderer.typepad.com


 

I was born into a family of artists, and painting and drawing were always second nature to me. However I was also deeply interested in animals and eventually did an undergraduate degree in zoology followed by a post-graduate degree in genetics and development. When I first arrived in the UK from America, I was lucky enough to meet Anne McLaren, and then worked in her lab for some 22 years, at first in Edinburgh and later in London. When she retired I moved to the lab of Austin Smith in Edinburgh, where I stayed until he took over the directorship of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research in Cambridge.

Throughout my career in science I sketched as a hobby, and when I began to work less in the lab I began to draw and paint more. However it wasn’t until recently, at the suggestion of Dr Jenny Nichols, that I began to think of using themes and ideas from biology in art. Jenny arranged for some of my work to be shown at the autumn meeting of the BSDB, in Edinburgh, where it was well received, and this encouraged me to devote more time and effort to working with biological images. Here are a few of the first things that I did. They are all made with computerised machine embroidery, a technique usually used commercially for such things as embroidering logos on hats and sweatshirts. However I find that it’s also an intriguing medium to use for more interesting subjects.

I continue to interpret images from biology in drawing, painting and fabric art, and would welcome suggestions from other members of the community for suitable subjects. Biology is an intensely visual science and fascinating images, which could be so effective as subjects for art, are abundant in all fields of biological research.

 

 

Germline

A chimaera, an animal made up of cells of more than one genetic origin, is represented in this picture by the grey mouse, presumably developed from cells of white and black mouse strains. But the cells of the chimaera maintain their own genetic identity and may appear again in its progeny. In this case the young white and black mice illustrate that the cells of both white and black strains can still give rise to living animals. This shows that the grey mouse is a germline chimaera, something that all those of us who work with chimaeras would recognise as a successful result

 

Chimaera

This is simply a stylised representation of how a chimaera is formed from a combination of two (or more) different cell types: the yellow and brown mice “merge” in the form of a chimaera.

 

Conceptual chimaera

This somewhat allegorical version of a lab rat may not be immediately recognisable as a chimaera, but he was inspired by the idea of chimaeras. As a chimaera is made up of cells from more than one genetic origin, so this rat is made up of different patterns that come together to make a whole.

 

Strains

There are hundreds of different strains of mice, and the variation in coat colour and pattern between them is fascinating. Here are just a few of them: you may recognise C57/Bl6, CBA, 129, DBA, W, JF1/Mg and BALB/c

 

Pre-implantation

This series of images is inspired by the earliest stages in the development of the mouse embryo, from the 8-cell stage, through compaction to the morula and finally the blastocyst. They were interesting designs to create, because they’re all basically round balls of cells – that is, three-dimensional structures – and it was an intriguing challenge to use different densities of embroidery to give this three-dimensional effect. You may notice that the blastocyst has the addition of several alien cells (in red) which suggest that it’s an injection chimaera

 

Culture

Here are some cells as they might appear in culture. It’s true that they seem to be plant rather than animal cells, but of course botanical material has just as much visual appeal as cells from an animal. The red and blue colour scheme reflects conventional haematoxylin and eosin staining but it also makes for a cheerful and colourful image. The green cells suggests that not all cells in a culture may be identical – maybe these are cells derived from a chimaeric organism

 

Purkinje

And while we’re on the subject of cells, here are some Purkinje cells of the brain. Not only do they have a fascinating structure, but they can sometimes take on wonderful colours when tissue sections are stained for the microscope. These colours are of course not a part of the cells or their function but they’re still beautiful to look at. And I love the beautiful branching, tree-like patterns the cells make

 

Young chick

As a mouse embryologist I’m more familiar with the mouse than with any other animal. But other animals have also contributed hugely to understanding of genetics and embryology. One of these is the chick, a fascinating organism, and here is a young chick developing in the egg, perched on top of the yolk…

 

Egg

…and here it is when a little bit older

 

Zebrafish

Another important research organism with which I have no practical experience is the zebrafish, but after reading some papers on zebrafish genetics it proved impossible to resist responding to the huge variety of colours and patterns produced by various crossing experiments. Here are a few of the many different colour and pattern variation of zebrafish that I’ve seen

 

Embryo fish

And while we’re on the subject of fish, here’s a very young, embryonic fish

 

Newts

As my PhD thesis was about amphibian germ cells I had to include an amphibian image in the collection somewhere. I particularly liked this piece because it shows how subtle the machine embroidery technique can be. You can’t see it from the scan, but the eggs and embryos are made up of four separate layers of thin embroidery. They look different depending on how the light hits the embroidery – sometimes you can see the embryos clearly, and sometimes they’re hardly visible at all.

 

Doe and fawn

Of course deer aren’t usually used as subjects in genetics and embryology (although I did once start a project about stem cells in deer antlers) But I like deer, and we have so many where I live in Aberdeenshire that I had to put one in. This is just a doe with her as-yet-unborn fawn

 

Structural Bird / Structural Deer.

The visual relationship between the skeleton and the soft tissues of the body is such a complicated one that I’ve never really managed to capture it in a visual image. So these are simple compromises doing no more than suggesting the importance of the skeletal structure that underlies the entire shape and form of the living animal

 

Independent assortment

And finally a childishly simple visual interpretation of the phenomenon of independent assortment, visualising how the alleles governing various blue and silver phenotypes might be re-distributed in the progeny of the fish. It’s far from what you could call a scientific presentation, but it’s effective as an image, and it was fun to do

 

All images Copyright Mia Buehr, 2016

 

Thumbs up (13 votes)
Loading...

Tags: ,
Categories: Images, Research, Science Art

An interview with Paola Arlotta

Posted by , on 3 November 2016

This interview by Catarina Vicente first featured in Development.

 

Paola Arlotta is a neurodevelopmental biologist based at the Harvard Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology in Boston, MA, USA. Her lab studies the birth, differentiation and assembly of neuronal circuits in the cerebral cortex with the aim of developing novel therapies for degenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. Paola has recently become an editor for Development, and we asked her about her research and career, and her recent efforts to support women in science.

 

arlotta

 

When did you first become interested in biology?

I can’t remember a time when I was not interested in biology. My parents tell me that even as a child I was very curious about nature, and would spend hours in the garden digging up worms and looking at ants. I became seriously interested in biology in high school. I had an incredible science teacher who was very inspirational. He made us think deeply about how nature works, we did experiments, it was always very exciting. I knew that I had to study biology at university, and that is what I did.

 

Your lab studies the birth, differentiation and circuitry assembly of neurons in the cerebral cortex. Why does this topic interest you?

The cerebral cortex interests me because it is really the part of the brain that makes us human and controls the most complex functions that human beings are capable of, such as language – we are having this very conversation thanks to our neocortex. The neuronal cell types that underlie those complex behaviours have fascinated neuroscientists for centuries. Now, due to technological advances, we can really examine these cells. We can begin to understand mechanistically how this outstanding numbers of neuron types is made, how they choose their partners in order to make the circuits that underlie cerebral cortical functioning, and so on. Looking at this system is fascinating. I am intrigued by complex systems; they’re really hard to study, but it’s very rewarding.

 

What are the questions that your lab is currently tackling?

The central focus of our work has been to understand cortical development, and the mechanisms of fate specification and maintenance of neuron identity. But lately we have started to address fascinating new questions, some more fundamental while others more applied. For example, we are very interested in understanding how the diversity and function of cerebral cortex neurons, in particular the excitatory pyramidal neurons, affects the behaviour of other cells. We are particularly interested in their interaction with oligodendrocytes, the cells that myelinate the axons. Starting from this fundamental question – whether there is a special type of communication between neurons and oligodendrocytes – we made a very interesting discovery. It was previously thought that myelin was deposited along the axons of all neurons using the same mechanism. We discovered that this is not in fact true for all neurons. We are realising that the interactions are more complex and involve many different classes of cells. We are following the idea that there might be node-type cells, in this case pyramidal neurons, that can influence the behaviour of other cell types, and this system can evolve and change really quickly, guaranteeing the more complex functions of the cortex.

Another fundamental question that may have translational impact relates to the stability of neuronal identity. All neurons in the mammalian cerebral cortex, including our own, are made during embryonic development. We live and die with the cells that were made when we were embryos, so a human neuron can last 100 years. The dogma in the field is that neurons cannot change. Once they have a certain identity they keep it for the life of the organism. We are beginning to challenge that, although this is a very new field and there is much that we don’t understand. It seems that within the first couple of weeks postnatally, the young neurons of the mouse brain can actually change their identity if you challenge them with a powerful enough transcription factor. This suggests that neurons have the ability to change. My lab is building on this initial work. This is a very important question from a fundamental point of view because it can tell us whether neurons stay the same during the life of the organism or not. But it is also interesting from a therapeutic point of view because it might be an alternative way to achieve neuron replacement in vivo. Many neurodegenerative diseases affect only certain classes of neurons. Perhaps it might be possible to turn some of the spared neurons into those that the disease affects.

 

You recently started using brain organoids to study development and disease. Can you tell us about this technology and why it’s useful to you?

I have become very interested in complex neurodevelopmental diseases like autism-spectrum disorder and neuropsychiatric diseases. We know so little about these diseases; in some cases we don’t even know which neurons or circuits are targeted, although we do know that the cerebral cortex is affected in most cases. We also know that these are diseases of the human brain that fundamentally affect core human capacities, so they are very hard to model in mice. We (like others) are using what we know about the normal development of the cerebral cortex to attempt to induce the formation not just of neurons or glia, but of actual brain tissue, including the cerebral cortex, in a dish. This is what I call ‘next-generation’ 3D organoids. They are very complex tissue-like structures that start from human pluripotent stem cells, then form embryoid bodies, and later form primitive ventricles and vesicles, a process which, at least morphologically, resembles early brain development. We have built on the protocol that was developed by Juergen Knoblich and others, and we have tried to extend the developmental window of these organoids as much as we can to be able to look at circuits. To achieve this, organoids have to grow and develop for a very long time so that they attain cellular diversity and then form a meaningful set of circuits that we can study. I am very excited about this project because it is the first time that we have been able to build on our knowledge of development to attempt to model a meaningful replica of what we see in vivo. And because we are using human cells, these 3D organoids could be incredible screening platforms to understand how disease mutations affect human circuits, and for clinical and drug screening.

 

Do you think there are ethical issues with ‘growing a brain in a dish’?

I think we need to be confident but careful with this type of work. There is a lot of misconception out there regarding what these models really are. I don’t like it when people call them ‘mini-brains’. They are only a very oversimplified replica of what you find in vivo. We are still trying to understand how to make them develop, even on a micro scale, and attain the cellular diversity and circuits that we know exist in the human brain. So, calling them ‘mini-brains’ is just making a headline. Yes, we need to be careful not to cross ethical boundaries, but at the same time these models could be extremely powerful to understand devastating human diseases about which we know nothing. We should keep this in mind when we think about what should and should not be done.

 

Your work is at the crossroads between the neural development and stem cell fields. How do you think the relationship between these two fields is evolving?

When I was interviewing for a lab head position, I had to make a choice about the kind of department that would be ideal for my work – either a neurobiology department or a stem cell department. At the Harvard Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology I can have both, because I am also surrounded by an incredible community of neuroscientists. What I have learned from being at the interface between neuroscience and stem cell biology is that if you are trying to model complex tissue and organ physiology, you really need both expertises. You need a stem cell biologist to understand the starting point and the potential, and to really push the technological boundaries. But you also need to have a deep understanding of the type of tissue and cells that you are trying to model. If you are working on a disease of the brain, chances are you need a neuroscience background, or to collaborate closely with a neurobiologist. I think this interface is growing. When I first started there was not as much participation by neuroscientists as I see today. It was necessary for people to appreciate the limitations of the neuron differentiation protocols to allow the field to develop. Now the cream of neuroscience is really embracing the idea that you can make meaningful neurons, and now even meaningful tissue, in the dish that resembles what they are used to seeing in vivo. I think that’s wonderful because we do need neuroscientists working with stem cell biologists to push this field to the next level. The more this interface is fostered via funding and meetings that bring people together the better it will be.

 

You have recently become an editor for Development. How do you hope to contribute to the journal?

I was very excited to join. I grew up as a scientist reading the journal and I really respect the other editors. I think my contribution is related to this interface between stem cell biology and neurobiology. My roots, and the majority of the work done in my lab, is on neurodevelopment, but I am a faculty member in a department submerged in stem cell biology. I can see from the colleagues around me where the field is going and where the excitement is. I think I can bring this unique perspective. I would really like to see more high-level papers in Development that bring together neurobiology and stem cell biology, regenerative biology and disease modelling.

 

Recently you and other prominent scientists proposed a list of seven actionable strategies for advancing gender equality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Why did you think it was important to write this document and what do you hope to get out of it?

It was very important for me to write this document. As a woman in science I always felt respected and valued. I never felt that because I was a woman I couldn’t get the faculty position I wanted, for example. However, even in an ideal situation like mine, I still feel that there were times in my life when I really had to make very difficult choices between being the mother and the scientist that I really wanted to be. I probably had my children at the worst possible times. I had my daughter in the last two years of my postdoc, when you do most of your work and interviews, and my son during the first year of my lab. But it turned out ok and I am of the firm belief, which I try to tell to all the young women that train in my lab, that you should do things for your personal life when you think is the right time for your personal life, and not when people think it is a good time for your career. You will then find a way to make it work. That said, I feel that certain practical things that can be addressed with money could have made the process much easier, especially in the first year after my children were born. I would have liked to have been able to spend a little more time with them, or stay at home a little longer on maternity leave, without fearing that my lab would not progress as fast as it should. It is important to raise awareness of this issue. There are not many women that choose to go onto a faculty position after their postdoc that will lead them to leadership in their field, and this is true both for academia and industry. This is because it requires you to invest so much of your personal time when you also have to invest so much effort and love in your own family – if you have one.

I am a practical person and I think there are practical solutions that can be implemented at an institutional level. I and others at the New York Stem Cell Foundation started with this first but, I hope, meaningful step. With these first seven points we tried to highlight the issues in the field, and we suggested ways to address them. Since the publication of this article we have met twice more as a group and have expanded our score card to include many other detailed points, but we wanted to start with a simple strategy so that the idea could take ground. We would like to make the leaders of major institutions accountable for the number of women they recruit and retain, in order to receive certain funding. Many funding agencies are becoming sensitive to this issue, and are considering ways to raise awareness and implement changes. This is by no means our own original idea, and we were inspired by what the Athena SWAN project is doing in the UK. Our project aims to find real solutions that are practical, doable and implementable, and that can change the situation for women in science. And these changes will benefit male scientists as well. I want my postdocs to know that this is the most beautiful job that they could have. It doesn’t have to be done with difficult decisions that neglect some of their fundamental needs.

 

What is your advice for young scientists?

I think that they should follow their dreams, and I really mean it. If they have a great idea, if they have a certain vision, they need to be brave from day one to implement it. Be brave, be bold, don’t be conservative! Then science becomes fun, and all the other things we have to deal with, like politics, don’t matter.

 

What would people be surprised to find out about you?

I was a figure skater for many years, with all of the costumes and jumps that come with it! I am also a pretty hard-core skier. I’ve skied since I was 2 and skated since I was 5 (although I stopped in college). I grew up in Northern Italy and my mum is from the Alps, so it runs in the family. My mum was a climber and a very good skier. She could probably still beat us on the slopes at 72!

 

Catarina Vicente

 

© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Interview