The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

POSITION FOR POSTDOCTORAL SCIENTIST IN TUMOR IMMUNOLOGY

Posted by , on 14 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

POSTDOCTORAL POSITION

 

Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL) offers a postdoctoral contract to join the Transformation and Metastasis group led by Dr. Eva González-Suárez within the Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC) http://www.idibell.cat/modul/area-6-programa-depigenetica-i-biologia-del-cancer/ca &  http://pebc.cat/

The laboratory of Dr Gonzalez Suarez is funded by the Susan G Komen Foundation and a European Research Council ERC-Consolidator grant. The candidate will join a project focused on understanding tumor-immune crosstalk in epithelial tumors.

 

The primary goal of Dr. Eva González-Suárez´s laboratory is to understand the signaling pathways implicated in epithelial stem cell fate, their alterations during cancer and metastasis, and the interactions between tumor cells and microenvironment. We have a multidisciplinary approach using mouse models, cell cultures, clinical samples and molecular and cell biology techniques to translate basic research into clinically relevant results.

 

REQUIREMENTS

 

We are looking for motivated postdoctoral scientists holding a PhD in a relevant discipline with interest in cancer biology. Candidates must have:

– An outstanding publication record in peer review journals

– Experience working with mouse models of cancer and patient derived xenografts.

– Strong technical skills in tumor immunology, molecular biology and lineage tracing.

 

WE OFFER

 

  • The opportunity to contribute to cutting-edge research projects and work closely with an international team of scientists and work in one of the leading labs in Europe.
  • A 3-year full time contract, immediate start. Renewal based on performance.

 

APPLICATION

 

  • Applications must include a CV with a cover letter and contacts for 2 references

Please apply by email to: egsuarez@idibell.cat. Please, clearly state in the subject of your email “Postdoc Position” and a link to your most outstanding publication

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Jobs

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

A Bioimage Analysis Community Meeting, NEUBIAS2020

Posted by , on 14 November 2016

 

Learn and Communicate Bioimage Analysis

NEUBIAS2020 conference is a new annual meeting of the BioImage Analysis community. We are very glad to invite you to the first conference in Lisbon (Portugal) on 12-17th of February 2017, hosted and co-organized by the Gulbenkian Institute of Science.

The conference aims to promote knowledge- and technological- transfer between all the players of the BioImage Analysis Community: Life scientists, Image Analysis and Software Developers, Microscopists, BioImaging Facility staff, and most importantly: Biomage Analysts, a new profession in Life Science that NEUBIAS aims to support and promote.

In brief, the event articulates in four parts:

All are now open to registration.

The symposium

The Symposium aims to offer a broad view over the latest developments and updates in Bioimage analysis and can be attended independent of registration to training schools. It includes

  • A Showcase giving exposure to open source software packages and tools updates
  • Company’s products
  • Community round tables
  • Career path debates
  • Community progress report

Bioimage Analysis will be covered as a broad field of Research, Technology-development and Service-for-Data-Producers (i.e. researchers in Life Science) in the context of many types of BioImage data: Optical Microscopy, Electron Microscopy, Medical Imaging, among others.

 

More About NEUBIAS, Mobility Grants, Careers, Action

The Network

NEUBIAS is a network Action funded by COST (www.cost.eu), aiming to maximize the impact of advances in imaging technology on the Life Sciences, and to boost the productivity of bioimaging-based research projects in Europe. The Action intends to provide a stronger identity to Bioimage Analysts by organising a new type of meeting fostering interactions between all stakeholders (i.e. NEUBIAS 2020).

Please visit our webpage for more information.

www.neubias.org

Mobility Grants

NEUBIAS also provides mobility funds for scientists willing to expand their knowledge in Bioimage Analysis and/or to develop Image Analysis capabilities for their research project.
Check the next Call for Short Term Scientific Missions, closing on November 15th, 2016.

http://eubias.org/NEUBIAS/mobility-grants/

Career Actions: Our Request

NEUBIAS also needs the input from the whole community to devise best-practice guidelines for the career path of BioImage Analysis, a new profession still not fully recognized in the field. If your work activity embraces Bioimage Analysis to support Life Science (as a service, collaboration etc…), please take 5 minutes to fill our new “Career Consultation”:

http://eubias.org/NEUBIAS/careers/


We are looking forward to see you in February!

On behalf of all NEUBIAS members

Gaby Martins (Event Host, co-organizer)
Sebastian Munck and Arne Seitz (Event Co-organizers)
Jean-Yves Tinevez (Training School co-Organizer)
Fabrice Cordelières and Paulo Aguiar (Training School Organizers)
Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux, Chong Zhang, Sébastien Tosi and Graeme Ball (Taggathon Organizers)
Julia Fernandez Rodriguez (STSMs coordinator)
Kota Miura (Vice Chair, Training School co organizer)
Julien Colombelli (Chair)

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Categories: News

Forgotten classics: Rosa Beddington’s chimeras

Posted by , on 11 November 2016

R. S. P. Beddington (1981). An autoradiographic analysis of the potency of embryonic ectoderm in the 8th day postimplantation mouse embryo. Journal of Experimental Embryology and Morphology. 64: 87-10. Open Access
R. S. P. Beddington (1982). An autoradiographic analysis of tissue potency in different regions of the embryonic ectoderm during gastrulation in the mouse. Journal of Experimental Embryology and Morphology. 69: 265-285. Open Access

Recommended by Patrick Tam, University of Sydney


 

The original chimera was a beast made out of different beasts, with “the head of a lion and the tail of a serpent, while her body was that of a goat, and she breathed forth flames of fire”. Today’s biomedical definition is not too far from Homer’s, a chimera being an organism made up of cells from more than one zygote. As an experimental technique, chimeras have been used for decades to define the developmental potential of cells and the influence of the environment cells find themselves in (does a cell stick to its original fate if transplanted to a different location? Does the environment override an initial choice?). Even today, one stringent test for pluripotency is the ability of transplanted cells to give rise to all cell types in the chimeric organism.

The first mouse chimeras (1, 2) were made by aggregating two pre-implantation (cleavage stage) embryos together: the resultant embryos, twice the normal size, gave rise to normal sized chimeric pups. Subsequent techniques involved injecting exogenous cells into blastocysts. But what about the decisions that happen in later stages? Post-implantation mouse chimeras were pioneered by Rosa Beddington, and her two single author papers describing the work, published in 1981 and 1982 in the Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology (the forerunner of Development), are the subject of this Forgotten Classics highlight.

 

embryo-pic
From Figure 3 in the 1981 paper. An 8th day mouse embryo.

 

The two papers should be read together, the second being a continuation and expansion of the first. The question that drove the project concerned the patterning of the epiblast (which was then referred to as the embryonic ectoderm), the tissue that gives rise to the embryo proper.  The problem was articulated by Beddington as follows:

 

“During gastrulation the single epithelial sheet of embryonic ectoderm is converted into a highly complicated form, made up of a variety of tissue types and embodying the basic design of the foetus. This means that the key to foetal organization must lie in the orderly allocation of tissue primordia within the embryonic ectoderm”

 

The problem was the inaccessibility of the mouse embryo for experimental manipulation. In Beddington’s time, while rats could be cultured ex utero until the end of gastrulation, mouse culturing techniques did not achieve comparable successes. Her papers describe a technique by which embryos are dissected from the uterus at day 8, at the late-primitive-streak stage, and then cultured for 36 hours in rat serum. These 36 hours are “a time of intensive cell division and differentiation and also marked by substantial morphogenetic activity”. The culture produced early-somite-stage embryos that look normal when compared to in utero counterparts, with some minor differences (they were more translucent, and had expanded yolk sacs). The work was a technical feat: dissecting early mouse embryos is not easy, yet Beddington was blessed with legendary dissecting skills.

 

embryo
Figure 1 from the 1982 paper. Beddington’s drawing of a sagittal section through an 8th day embryo, showing cell types and transplantation sites

 

This technique allowed the assessment of epiblast cell lineage in the intact embryo. As encountered in the last Forgotten Classic, cell lineage analysis requires a marker, and Beddington chose 3H-thymidine (3H-T), a radiolabelled nucleoside you can visualise with autoradiography. In many ways 3H-T is not the ideal marker: unlike genetic markers it dilutes with cell divisions; subsequent work indicated it can inhibit DNA synthesis and be cytotoxic (although this does not seem to have been a problem with Beddington’s work); and, perhaps most annoyingly, once you have your stained and sectioned embryos, you have to cover them with autoradiographic stripping film for three weeks before processing and analysing the film. Three weeks! And even then, after this intricate and demanding procedure, defective processing meant Beddington had  to discard whole batches of slides.

The method was to bathe day 8 embryos in 3H-T, remove cells from different regions of the epiblast, inject them into unstained, synchronous hosts, and see where the labelled cells ended up after 36 hours in culture. An elegant aspect of the work is the controls: controls that hadn’t been labelled; controls that had been bathed in 3H-T and cultured without dissection; controls that had been fixed before culturing. All of these experiments, diagrammed with characteristic artistry in the figure, were also carried out with reference to in utero development.

 

beddingotn
Figure 1 from the 1981 paper, showing the general strategy of the experiments.

 

With the method established – labelled controls looked pretty much the same as unlabelled controls, and the labelled cells could colonise host tissues and did not form structures you would not expect to see – the stage was set to address her main questions. Was cell fate spatially patterned in the epiblast? In other words, could you draw a fate map? And how plastic was this fate?

Beddington performed two types of injection. Orthotopic injections involved like-for-like injections, with labelled epiblast from a particular donor region injected into the same region in the host. These injections showed that different regions of the epiblast gave rise to different parts of the post-gastrulation embryo: for instance, distal epiblast could contribute to somites and notochord, but anterior epiblast could not. As Beddington acknowledged, this may not have been particularly surprising given results in the chick, but it was important to demonstrate that there was a consistent regionalised pattern of tissue allocation during gastrulation. You could begin to map the post-gastrulation embryo back to the epiblast.

 

technique
Figure 2 from the 1981 paper, showing the transplantation technique. The embryo was held in place with a holding pipette, and donor cells inserted into the tissue with an injection pipette.

 

What orthotopic transplantation cannot reveal is whether this regionalisation reflects an inherent cell fate, or the consequence of epiblast cells perceiving extrinsic cues. Heterotopic transplantation, putting donor cells in a location in the host that is different from where they came from, allowed Beddington to get at this. She found no evidence for rigid cell fate in the epiblast: when transplanted to a different location, cells readily contributed structures other than those they form normally (although there were some ‘propensities’ of certain cells to contribute to one structure or another, suggesting some degree of cell fate restriction). Thus, cell fate at the epiblast stage is ‘plastic’, and could be readily influenced by the environment the cells find themselves in. So the story is a mix: you can draw a fate map on the epiblast, but the cells are happy, if we labour the metaphor a bit, to learn a new language when transplanted into another country.

These papers represent a landmark of mouse embryology. In the following decades, many of the molecular players in epiblast patterning have been identified, as well as the mechanisms that maintain epiblast cell potency, supporting and expanding Beddington’s work. The recent BSDB meeting celebrating the present and future of chimeric research shows that chimeras still have as much to tell us about development as they taught Rosa Beddington in the early 1980s.

 


Thoughts from the field

Patrick Tam, University of Sydney

“The findings of these works have revealed the regionalisation of cell fates in the germ layers of the gastrulating mouse embryo, pointing to the establishment of a basic body plan.  These studies also outlined an experimental paradigm for the analysis of cell fate and potency in a mammalian embryo using innovative techniques of micromanipulation, lineage tracking and whole mouse embryo culture.     

Recently, there is heightened interest in the application of these techniques to generate post-implantation chimeras for assessing the differentiation potential of stem cells, such as mouse epiblast stem cells and human pluripotent stem cells1 . It is therefore timely and newsworthy to highlight Rosa’s papers.”

1:  Tam PPL (2016) Human stem cells can differentiate in post-implantation mouse embryos. Cell Stem Cell 18: 3-4.  PMID 26748747   DOI:10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.010

 

Virginia Papaioannou, Columbia University Medical Center

It is hard to remember a time before the fate map of the mammalian embryo had experimental backing, but in the late 70s, as mammalian embryo culture and manipulation techniques were just beginning to make great strides, it was the chick fate map that guided us and provided a template for investigation.  These two papers by Rosa Beddington were remarkable in adapting newly devised rat embryo culture methods to allow investigation of mouse postimplantation embryos ex utero and, for the first time, developing methods for making experimental postimplantation mouse chimeras.  Rosa used these techniques to approach two related aspects of embryonic cells: fate and potential, fate being the normal differentiation outcome of a cell in undisturbed development and potential being what that cell is capable of doing in altered circumstances, such as being placed heterotopically in a different position in the embryo. 

These two papers comprise the bulk of Rosa’s thesis work for her D.Phil. from Oxford University in 1981.  I was privileged to serve as her supervisor for this work and rereading the papers brought back the sheer gutsiness of this brilliant young student as she pioneered a new methodology for mouse embryology.  It also sent me searching for my copy of her dissertation, typewritten, with original photos taped onto the pages, where I marvelled anew at the camera lucida drawings of serial sections with labelled cells marked in pen, and hand drawn embryos with color-coded fate maps in coloured pencil. 

In the thesis, the work was divided into a chapter on cell fate (orthotopic tissue transplants in synchronous embryos) and a separate chapter on cell potency (heterotopic transplants in synchronous embryos).  In the subsequent publications this fate vs. potential distinction is not highlighted and both papers refer to “potency” in the title. Although I don’t remember why this was done, I imagine it was because of Rosa’s exactitude in the definition of the terms, as even synchronous orthotopic tissue transplantation is a disruption and might be subtly altering ‘normal’ cell fate.  As we understand more about altering cell states in the age of induced pluripotent stem cells, this assiduous attention to terminology and methodological detail is more relevant than ever.  Rosa’s papers, nonetheless, ushered in an era of rapid advances in understanding cell fate and potential in the postimplantation mammalian embryo.”

 


Aidan Maartens

This post is part of a series on forgotten classics of developmental biology. You can read the introduction to the series here and read other posts in this series here. We also welcome suggestions for future Forgotten Classics.

 

 

Thumbs up (8 votes)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Research

This month on the Node

Posted by , on 11 November 2016

A roundup of the Node’s highlights from October 2016. 

 

preprints

 

October’s most discussed post came from Development’s Executive Editor Katherine Brown, who reported from a workshop on preprints in Cambridge and gave a journal’s perspective on the promises and challenges of preprinting. The comments section is worth reading, as is this recent post from the organiser of the workshop, Alfonso Martinez-Arias.

 

michaux-et-al-fig-1c

We also continued our regular round up of preprints in developmental biology: September featured cell mechanics, cell divisions, and mesoderm development.

 

ImageJ=1.45b

We  heard from the DMDD about their latest screen into the genetics of neonatal death in mice, and from the IRB about the 18th Barcelona Biomedical Conference focussing on the insights developmental biology can give into pathology. Development’s sister journal Disease Models & Mechanisms announced a Special Collection all about rats.

 

img_1179

I reported from Development’s meeting on human development and stem cells (and included jittering scientists and some optical heritage), and the BSDB reported from their Autumn Meeting on the use of chimeras in developmental biology.

 

joe-matt

Finally, we heard from Matthew Towers and Joseph Pickering, authors of a recent Development paper on digit patterning in the chick.

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Highlights

Physical Biology of Stem Cells MRC 4-Year PhD Programme in Stem Cell Biology & Medicine

Posted by , on 10 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

stem-cells-logo

Is this you?:

  • Physical Sciences, Mathematical Sciences or Computational Sciences background?
  • Interested in applying your training to aspects of Stem Cell Biology?
  • Passion for scientific research & hold (or expect to) a relevant 1st degree at the highest level?

 

If so, the Cambridge Stem Cell Institute would like to hear from you.

 

To find out more and apply, please visit:
http://www.stemcells.cam.ac.uk/study/physical-biology

Application Deadline: 6 February 2017 

wellcome-logo-black        mrc-logo       university-of-cambridge-logo

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

From our sister journals – October 2016

Posted by , on 10 November 2016

Here we highlight some developmental biology related content from other journals published by The Company of Biologists.


 

Journal typography

roque

Helio Roque and colleagues describe that flies lacking MKS, a component of the transition zone in cilia, show abnormalities during development, but not in the adult.

 

liu

Hua Liu and  Ken-Ichi Nonomura describe large scale chromatin remodelling in meiosis I of rice mediated by the Argonaute protein MEL1

 

devos

In their Commentary, Damien Devos and colleagues explore changing concepts in the emergence of eukaryotic cells, and in his Editorial, Editor-in-Chief Michael Way announces a forthcoming special issue on plants

 

CoB_DisModMech_AW_RGB

DMM025874*009-11*cov.sugg

Gabrielle Kardon and colleagues show that TBX3 is responsible for specifying a subset of forelimb muscles, and their attachment to tendons.

 

spot

Nicholas Pilon and colleagues describe how a mouse line found in a screen for genes involved in neural crest development provides a model for Waardenburg syndrome type 4.

 

bingle

Colin Bingle and colleagues develop an in vitro model of the murine middle ear epithelium, recapitulating cell populations and protein production.

 

cagan

In his Editorial, Senior Editor Ross Cagan gives some tips for those wanting to conduct drug screening in model systems

 

CoB_BioOpen_AW

rooij

Johan de Rooij and colleagues disrupted αE-catenin function in developing zebrafish, and found that specifically disrupting αE-catenin mechnotransduction leads to defective convergence and extension.

 

volk

Elly Ordan and Talila Volk describe how Amontillado, the Drosophila homologue of pheremone convertase 2, cleaves Slit to promote muscle patterning.

 

stress

Ernesto Maldonado and colleagues show that zebrafish mutants lacking stress granules have developmental abnormalities and respond poorly to stress.

 

Journal typography

Manfred Schartl and colleagues explore how the fish genome adapts to abrupt ploidy change by allele silencing.

 

Karl Gotthard and colleagues explore how butterflies regulate energy and lipid metabolism during diapause.

 

 

 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Highlights

Intern for Disease Models & Mechanisms

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

cob_dismodmech_aw_rgb

 

DMM is looking for an enthusiastic intern who wishes to gain experience in science publishing, including writing press releases, contributing to our social media activities, and supporting our Reviews Editor with commissioned articles. The internship is envisaged to last for 9 months at a salary of £20,000 per annum pro rata.

Our interns have a great track record of continuing on into important publishing roles.

Joining an experienced and successful team, the internship offers an ideal opportunity to gain in-depth experience on a growing Open Access journal in the exciting and fast-moving field of translational research. DMM publishes primary research articles and a well-regarded front section, including commissioned reviews and poster articles, thought-provoking editorials and interviews with leaders in the field. We also have an active social media presence and will be growing our press release programme. The intern will work alongside an established publishing team in our Cambridge offices.

Because the journal serves both basic biomedical researchers and clinicians, applicants will have a PhD or MD, ideally with some relevant research experience, and a broad knowledge of model organisms and disease issues.

Is the role for you? You would be expected to…

Support our Reviews Editor:
• Identify and commission topical front-section content from top-ranking scientists, see articles through peer review and work closely with authors to finalise articles for publication.
• Travel to international scientific conferences and research institutes, representing the journal, keeping abreast of the latest research and making contacts in the DMM community.

Develop your own areas of activity:
• Spot newsworthy articles, write informative press releases and handle any media enquiries.
• Interview high-profile scientists in the biomedical arena.
• Contribute to our social media output.
• Be creative – contribute other ideas for the journal’s development and promotion.

Essential requirements for the job are enthusiasm, commitment, judgement and integrity. Candidates should have excellent interpersonal skills and confidence, excellent oral and written communication skills, and a broad interest in research and the research community. They should also be willing to travel. Previous editorial experience is not required, but we would expect candidates to be able to demonstrate an interest in scientific communication.

For details on how to apply, go to: http://www.biologists.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/DMM-Intern.pdf

DEADLINE FOR APPLICATIONS: 30TH NOVEMBER 2016

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Jobs

Embryogenesis Explained

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Gordon, N.K. & R. Gordon (2016). Embryogenesis Explained. Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Company. xxiii+759pp., 431 illustrationlogowordss. http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/8152
https://www.amazon.com/Embryogenesis-Explained-Natalie-K-Gordon/dp/9814350486/ref=mt_hardcover?_encoding=UTF8&me=

Here’s the Table of Contents:

Chapter 1: How Embryogenesis Began in Evolution
Chapter 2: Developmental Anatomy of the Axolotl
Chapter 3: Developmental Genetics: A Flying Tour
Chapter 4: Epigenetics: Higher Order Gene
Control
Chapter 5: The Cytoskeleton
Chapter 6: The Cell State Splitter and Differentiation Waves
Chapter 7: The Differentiation Tree and the Fate Map of the Axolotl
Chapter 8: Signal Transduction from the Cell State Splitter to the Nuclear State Splitter
Chapter 9: The Nuclear State Splitter
Chapter 10: Irritable Protoplasm: Forerunners to Differentiation Waves
Chapter 11: Why Evolution is Progressive
Chapter 12: Wholeness and the Implicate Embryo: Embryogenesis as Self-Construction of the Observer
Index

Contact: DickGordonCan@gmail.com

Yes, this is a book announcement, not a review. Please contact me with the venue if you would like to publish a proper, arm’s length book review.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Book Reviews, News

A Day in the Life of a Coral Lab

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Hi, I’m Yuuri Yasuoka, a postdoc in the Marine Genomics Unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST). Okinawa is a subtropical Japanese island surrounded by beautiful coral reefs (Figure 1). Why do we study coral here? OIST is the best place in Japan to study coral, with the good access to wild coral reefs and advanced research facilities for molecular biology.

 

Figure 1

Figure 1. Beautiful coral reefs in Okinawa. (A) An ocean view from OIST. (B) Acropora community at Ishigaki Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan (Photo: Yuna Zayasu).

 

How important is it to study corals?

Coral reefs are one of the most biodiverse ecosystems in the world, and are believed to support roughly 25% of all marine species (Knowlton et al., 2010). In addition, they are also important for the local Okinawan economy, as fisheries and tourist attractions. Therefore, our unit, led by Prof. Noriyuki Satoh, has been studying coral genetics to understand coral ecosystems at the molecular level. In 2011, our group reported the first draft genome of a stony coral, Acropora digitifera (Shinzato et al., 2011). This species is very common in Okinawa (Figure 2A). Using the genome database, we can now address many biological questions concerning corals that were impossible to answer previously.

 

Corals occupy an important phylogenetic position when it comes to understanding evolution of metazoan body plans. Corals belong to the Phylum Cnidaria, which also includes sea anemones, hydras, and jellyfishes. It forms a sister group to the Bilateria. Although most cnidarians are marine organisms, the most widely used experimental model cnidarians, Hydra and Nematostella, are very tiny freshwater and brackish water animals. While corals are a primitive clade of cnidarians that diverged from sea anemones ~500 Mya, they are one of the most successful cnidarian groups (Shinzato et al., 2011). Thus, coral studies tell us much about conserved ancestral features of cnidarian body plans. Recently, we published a research paper analyzing molecular functions of the brachyury gene in coral embryos (Yasuoka et al., 2016). Because cnidarians lack mesoderm and because brachyury functions as a mesoderm-forming gene in vertebrates, this study sheds light on evolutionary origins of vertebrate mesoderm.

Next, I will discuss the most exciting day in a coral lab. That occurs when corals spawn.

 

Coral spawning

It is generally believed that corals spawn once per year under a full moon; however, in reality it is not that simple in Okinawa. First, spawning is totally unpredictable. It ranges from one week before a full moon to two weeks after. For spawning experiments, we collect 5-10 wild coral colonies about two weeks before experiments and keep them in seaside aquaria. Every night, we check them to see whether they show signs of spawning. This is called “bundle setting,” as corals produce red or orange bundles of gametes near the mouths of their polyps (Figure 2B). In Acropora digitifera, this occurs at approximately 8 pm, and the colony starts to spawn at around 10 pm (Figure 2C). Interestingly, another Acropora species, A. tenuis starts to spawn at around 8 pm. The spawning time differs between species, but it is very precise.

 

Figure 2

Figure 2. Coral spawning. (A) Acropora digitifera colonies in shallow water at Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan. (B) “Bundle setting” of Acropora tenuis (Photo: Yuna Zayasu). (C) Acropora digitifera colonies that are spawning.

 

Second, the spawning day is highly variable, depending on location and local conditions. Acropora species spawn during May and June. Usually, corals in the Yaeyama Islands, which are located in southwestern Okinawa Prefecture, spawn one month earlier than at Okinawa Island. Even around the same island, the spawning day differs between locations. In fact, among our colonies in aquaria, collected at the same location, not all colonies spawned on the same night. Furthermore, we have observed that some colonies spawn twice in one season. Thus, there are many challenges in obtaining coral gametes, but with considerable experience, we have become quite successful.

Movie 1. Spawning of Acropora digitifera.

 

Microinjection of coral eggs

If we were not coral researchers, we would be satisfied just to be able to observe the beautiful and mysterious spawning of corals (Movie1). However, after spawning occurs we have to do our experiments. Acropora corals spawn bundles that contain both eggs and sperm. After bundles float to the water surface, the surrounding membrane ruptures to release eggs and sperm. Because they do not self-fertilize, we collect bundles from different individuals separately to perform in vitro fertilization (Figure 3A). After collecting bundles from seaside aquaria, we bring them to the lab at OIST by car; it takes ~15 min. When they arrive at the lab, the collecting tubes include an orange egg layer on the surface and white sperm solution (Figure 3B,C). To fertilize the eggs, we mix eggs and sperm from different individuals. In our experience, Acropora gametes can actively fertilize at least as much as 5 hours after spawning. Thus, we can obtain synchronously developing embryos at 30 min ~ 1 hour intervals.

 

Figure 3

Figure 3. Gamete bundles of Acropora. (A) Collection of gamete bundles from each spawning individual separated in buckets at Sesoko Marine Station of the University of Ryukus, 2012. (B) Eggs and sperm separated in a collecting tube. (C) Magnified image of bundles containing both eggs and sperm.

 

We start microinjections 30 min after fertilization. Because Acropora eggs are very yolky and float on sea water, we had to develop a method to immobilize them (Figure 4). First, fertilized Acropora eggs are positioned between glass capillaries attached to a glass slide. Next, sea water is removed as much as possible, resulting in deformation of embryos due to the surface tension of the remaining water. Then, we inject antisense morpholinos into immobilized embryos to inhibit functions of specific genes. After microinjection, embryos are returned to sea water where they develop normally. Usually, I inject 100-200 embryos from a single batch for each type of morpholino; this takes 30-45 min. When I finish an experiment for several kinds of morpholino, it is usually 3:00-4:00 am. After microinjection experiments, I drive home with tired eyes. Injected embryos are sorted based upon fluorescence of injected materials and used for further experiments.

 

After numerous trials and errors, I developed this method and completed the first analysis of gene functions during coral development (Yasuoka et al., 2016). Because we can do experiments using coral embryos only once per year, it took five years to publish the paper.

 

Figure 4

Figure 4. Microinjection experiments of coral eggs. (A) Equipment for coral egg microinjection. (B) Schematic of our microinjection method. (C) Acropora embryos aligned between glass capillaries. (D) A photo seen with a stereomicroscope, showing embryos are deformed and retained by the surface tension.

 

Future perspective of coral studies

One of the biggest concerns about coral reef ecosystems is “coral-bleaching.” Inside their cells, corals possess symbiotic algae (Symbiodinium), on which they depend for photosynthetic products. If corals suffer severe stresses, such as high temperature, acidification, or oxidation, the symbiotic relationship collapses and corals bleach and die. Coral bleaching is an increasingly serious problem around the world, due to global climate change. However, the genetic basis of this symbiosis is largely unknown. In 2013, our lab also decoded the genome of a species of Symbiodinium (Shoguchi et al., 2013). Using the microinjection technique, now we are trying to determine the molecular mechanisms underlying coral-bleaching.

 

References

Knowlton, N., Brainard, R. E., Fisher, R., Moews, M., Plaisance, L., & Caley, M. J. (2010). Coral reef biodiversity. Life in the World’s Oceans: Diversity Distribution and Abundance, 65-74.

Shinzato, C., Shoguchi, E., Kawashima, T., Hamada, M., Hisata, K., Tanaka, M., Fujie, M., Fujiwara, M., Koyanagi, R., Ikuta, T., Fujiyama, A., Miller, D. J., & Satoh, N. (2011). Using the Acropora digitifera genome to understand coral responses to environmental change. Nature, 476(7360), 320-323.

Shoguchi, E., Shinzato, C., Kawashima, T., Gyoja, F., Mungpakdee, S., Koyanagi, R., Takeuchi, T., Hisata, K., Tanaka, M., Fujiwara, M., Hamada, M., Seidi, A., Fujie, M., Usami, T., Goto, H., Yamasaki, S., Arakaki, N., Suzuki, Y., Sugano, S., Toyoda, A., Kuroki, Y., Fujiyama, A., Medina, M., Coffroth, M. A., Bhattacharya, D., & Satoh, N. (2013). Draft assembly of the Symbiodinium minutum nuclear genome reveals dinoflagellate gene structure. Current Biology, 23(15), 1399-1408.

Yasuoka, Y., Shinzato, C., & Satoh, N. (2016). The mesoderm-forming gene, Brachyury, regulates ectoderm-endoderm demarcation in the coral, Acropora digitifera. Current Biology, 26(21), 2885-2892.

Thumbs up (7 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , ,
Categories: Lab Life, Research

Postdoctoral position-Mansour Laboratory-University of Utah

Posted by , on 8 November 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

My laboratory in the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Utah has an open position for a postdoctoral fellow to work on NIH-funded projects involving FGF signaling in auditory sensory and supporting cell differentiation in the mouse. The ideal candidate should have at least two years of graduate or postdoctoral research experience in perinatal/postnatal inner ear development, including anatomic, molecular and functional analyses, with strong publications (can be pending) in these areas, but I also welcome applicants with strong experience in other developing sensory systems. Stipend will follow NIH guidelines and the fellow will be mentored through the process of applying for individual support (stipend and/or newly developed project) as appropriate. In addition, presentation and networking opportunities include participation in the weekly Human Genetics Research in Progress series and the monthly Inner Ear Research Group, which comprises multiple labs with diverse interests.

 

E-mailed inquiries to Suzanne Mansour (suzi.mansour@genetics.utah.edu) should include a brief (<1 page) current research description, a Biosketch, and the names and contact information of two individuals (current PI and one other), who can be contacted to comment on your suitability for this position. The ideal candidate would be able to start in early 2017.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs