The community site for and by
developmental and stem cell biologists

Questions of the Month – After the Referendum

Posted by , on 30 June 2016

On the 23rd of June the United Kingdom held a referendum on whether to remain a member of the European Union or to leave. Prior to the vote, Nature reported that 83% of nearly 2000 polled scientists favoured remaining, Picture4and letters from Royal Society members and Nobel Prize winners urged the public to vote to remain in the interests of British research. The result was called early on Friday morning: the UK had voted to leave the EU, by 51.9% to 48.1% (around 17 million to 16 million voters). We’re now faced with the question of what this might mean for UK science, and, given how interconnected science is, also how it might influence science in the EU and the rest of the world.

 

So we’ve got two Questions of the Month for June, one personal and one more global:

 

What does the Referendum result mean for you, scientifically and career-wise?

 

Are there practical steps we as a community can do to ensure a bright future for UK and EU science?

 

We’re hoping to hear from as broad a selection of people as possible: UK and EU nationals working here in the UK, elsewhere in the EU or in the wider world; students, postdocs, PIs, and people who have left the lab bench!

Considering this is a fast moving topic, we’ve also created a page with various links to ‘Science After the Referendum’ content. We will try to keep this page updated, and welcome suggestions for pieces we’ve missed.

We recognise what an emotive subject this is, and would like to try to keep this discussion to the referendum’s impact on science and careers. Let us know what you think in the Comment boxes below, or via social media (we’ll also be collating these answers via Storify).

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Discussion

Navigate the archive

Use our Advanced Search tool to search and filter posts by date, category, tags and authors.

After the Referendum: Links

Posted by , on 30 June 2016

To complement our Questions of the Month, we’ve brought together some post-referendum science links

 

Picture4

News and Comment

Nature reported on science’s reaction to the news, on post-ref limbo, bemoaned the lack of a leaving plan in an Editorial, and assessed the mood seven days later.

Science  documented the immediate reaction, ran an interview with Anne Glover, former EU science adviser, and discussed the role of science in future negotiations in an Editorial.

Times Higher Education has collated all of its post-ref content in one place, and recently documented the emerging worries of UK acadmics

Buzzfeed documented the worries of young scientists, and reported on the government’s attempts to reassure us about the future

The Royal Society of Biology reported from their annual Parliamentary Links Day, where the President of the Royal society delivered a speech

The BBC interviewed Paul Nurse, Director of the Francis Crick Institute, and Jo Johnson, Science Minister. Pallab Gosh, BBC science correspondent, reported on the consequences for science.

Jeremy Farrar, Director of the Wellcome Trust, gave his thoughts in an interview

A view from Australia from The Conversation

 

Opinion

Mike Galsworthy (Scientists For EU) wrote in the New Scientist about scientists’ anger and future strategy

James Briscoe (Crick Institute) shared his thoughts

Helen Rippon (Worldwide Cancer Research) addressed what the result meant for collaboration in The Huffington Post

Phill Jones (Digital Science) explored what the result meant for the UK’s knowledge economy from The Scholarly Kitchen

Athene Donald (Cavendish Laboratory) encourages UK scientists to continue applying for ERC funding

 

Statements from organisations and institutions 

The UK Minister of State for Universities and Science  

The Royal Society

The Biochemical Society

EMBL-EBI (and from the EMBL blog)

Universities UK

The European Commission

Campaign for Science and Engineering

 

Surveys

Scientists for EU is monitoring the impact on science, and is seeking examples of direct effects on career plans, investments, and roles in consortia.

The Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee is seeking written submissions addressing science and the referendum for an inquiry in July (Nicola Blackwood, Chair of the Committee, outlined why here)

 

Please let us know if you find any additional useful material.

 

 

Thumbs up (1 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Discussion

YEN does it again

Posted by , on 29 June 2016

Last month saw the return of the Young Embryologist Network annual meeting held this year at the UCL Institute of Child Health. To settle into the long weekend, a number of us from the Briscoe Lab at the Crick Mill Hill site headed on down to central London to spend the day being inspired by talks from PhD students, Postdocs and several invited guest speakers. We were met with an impressive array of speakers, highly interactive poster sessions and an atmosphere buzzing with young embryologists demonstrating their clear passion for cell and developmental biology. With such excellent organisation and enthusiasm, we are happy to write about our thoughts of the meeting, and greatly anticipate the next event.

 

DSC_0092
Poster session (photo provided by Ruben Perez).

 

To kick off the day, our newest lab member, Teresa Rayon, opened the “Cell Fate Determination” session. Presenting her PhD project, Teresa demonstrated the importance of enhancer usage and developmental pathways that direct tissue-specific expression of Cdx2 in the early mouse blastocyst. Following this tour de force, the opening session only continued to satisfy our appetite for developmental biology, concluding with the two prize-winning talks of the day. Sarah Bowling (Rodriguez Lab), presented an elegant story on the role of mTOR signalling, a main component involved in cell competition in early embryos. Her studies showed the link between developmental signalling, metabolism and cell survival, for which she received the Sammy Lee Memorial Medal. This award recognises an early stage career embryologist, who not only carries out inspiring work but also has the ability to communicate their science in a personable manner, a skill that Sammy Lee was well known for. Following this, the session concluded with Sarah Harrison (Zernicka-Goetz lab), who was awarded a second place prize for her work on organoids, and how asymmetry occurs in the early embryo. At this point we were left with a clear feeling of excitement that in vitro systems such as stem cells have afforded developmental biologists, as more and more becomes possible at the tissue and organ level….

 

The second session of the day concentrated on polarity and asymmetry with the best place to focus being the zebrafish brain. The talks up until this point all had one thing in common: stunning imagery, which gave a natural build up into the first external speaker of the day, Dale Moulding from UCL Institute of Child Health. His talk covered new and emerging technologies in microscopy, covering a range of approaches from micro-CT, to OPT, SPIM and light-sheet imaging – a veritable repertoire of optical imaging solutions, which are continually pushing the boundaries of image resolution and depth of field.

 

After the lunch break the second guest session was filled with inspiring presentations on early embryonic development from Kathy Niakan (Francis Crick Institute) and Shankar Srinivas (University of Oxford). Kathy discussed mouse and human blastocyst development, focusing on the key transcriptional regulators involved in early lineage commitment. Shankar then followed with an examination of the cellular mechanisms involved in driving early AP patterning in the mouse, and in establishing a beating heart. Echoing earlier sentiments of the day, he demonstrated how light-sheet microscopy can be exploited to reveal impressive cellular-level detail in the context of whole organisms as they develop in real time. The generation of this type of live imaging data now poses new challenges to the developmental biology field, in how best to reconstruct individual cells and extrapolate the intricate details of developing organs. Such a feat will undoubtedly rely on the continued collaboration between biologists and physicists alike to develop the best possible data analysis solutions.

 

The final session, “Morphogenesis, Repair and Regeneration” had talks on cell matrix adhesions during contact inhibition of locomotion as well as cell movement in distal neuropore closure. To complete the session, Tapan Papilia (Hughes lab) gave an insight into Pax7 stem cells in muscles and their roles in regeneration and repair.

 

YEN awards ceremony (photo provided by Ruben Perez).

Closing the talks for the day, we welcomed Professor Paul Martin (University of Bristol), invited to give The Sammy Lee Memorial Lecture. Capturing the essence of YEN, Paul’s talk reminded us that it’s not only important to work hard, but to enjoy the work that you’re doing – an important aspect that can drive discovery. His captivating presentation highlighted that no matter what area of development you may find yourself in, the basic underpinnings of biology can have far reaching implications. Some of these are being realised in the field of tumour biology, where studies that began in fly have transitioned to vertebrate models of wound healing that are informing cancer treatments. Never knowing exactly where one will end up is definitely an attraction for many developmental biologists, and a motivation that drives us to work long (and sometimes tedious) hours at the bench or desk.

 

YEN2016 meeting participants. From left to right: Lorena Garcia-Perez, Vicki Metzis, Marta Moris Sanz, Ruben Perez, Teresa Rayon, Katherine Exelby, Neda Mousavy.
YEN meeting participants. From left to right: Lorena Garcia-Perez, Vicki Metzis, Marta Moris Sanz, Ruben Perez, Teresa Rayon, Katherine Exelby, Neda Mousavy (photo provided by Teresa Rayon).

 

From cells to embryos, the YEN meeting makes a compelling case that the UK harbours many talented young scientists. Importantly, these individuals come from across the globe and are fuelled by a potent combination of excellent research leaders, high quality facilities and resources – a tradition that we are proud to be a part of now and into the future. An important conclusion that we take away from this meeting is that a successful “young embryologist” is in our view not only a creative, open-minded, cross-disciplinary individual, but also an excellent communicator, both to the public and to scientists alike. Events such as these are important to promote these aspirations. For this, we would like to thank the organising committee and sponsors who enabled this excellent meeting. We look forward to continuing our participation in future events organised by the young embryologists network and strongly encourage you to do the same.

Katherine Exelby & Vicki Metzis

 


For another view on YEN 2016, read Thomas’ report

Thumbs up (7 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , , , , ,
Categories: Events, Research

From our sister journals – June 2016

Posted by , on 29 June 2016

Here is some developmental biology related content from other journals published by The Company of Biologists.


Journal typography

 

Cartilage development downstream of Notch

inline-graphic-1 cartNotch signalling regulates various aspects of vertebrate cartilage development, and Hilton and colleagues now investigate the role of the Notch effectors HES1 and HES5. These transcription factors suppress chondrogenesis and promote chondrocyte hypertrophy, with some overlapping and some distinct functions.

 

Scribble promotes proliferation

The scaffolding Capture_Muthuswamyprotein Scribble is critical in establishing apical-basal polarity during epithelial development. Muthuswamy and coworkers now show that during pregnancy, Scribble has an unexpected role in promoting cell proliferation during alveologenesis, potentially via keeping the prolactin receptor at the cell surface.

 

A molecular pathway to haptotaxis

inline-graphic-1Haptotaxis is directional cell migration in response to a gradient of substrate-bound cues. Bear and colleagues investigate the cellular and molecular basis of haptotaxis using microfluidic chambers, and show that differential actin and lamellipodial dynamics, regulated by Arp2/3 and its upstream regulators, contribute to the process.

 


CoB_BioOpen_AW

 

A new way to generate photoreceptor-like cells

Capture_sekoDe novo generation of photoreceptor cells is therapeutically promising for patients with retinal degenerative diseases. Seko and colleagues describe efforts to directly reprogram blood cells into photoreceptor-like cells using the CRX transcription factor. This method may provide a cost-effective alternative to induced pluripotent stem cells for personalised drug screening and disease modelling [OA].

 

Polyamines in pigmentation

Zebrafish Capture_Zfish2pigmentation is an established model system for developmental patterning. Irion and colleagues now identify a new player in pigmentation: the polyamine spermidine. Mutations in the spermidine synthase gene leads to loss or interruption of the dark stripes of the flanks and fins [OA].

 


CoB_DisModMech_AW_RGB

 

Picking the right model

In his Editorial, Leonard Zon explores how complementing his lab’s primary model organism – the zebrafish – with other model systems helped in the translation of research to the clinic , and the importance of collaboration and infrastructure [OA].

 

 

Distinct cellular contributions to muscle repair

Hughes and colleagues Capture_Hughesidentify stem cell diversity in the wound healing response of zebrafish muscle, and propose that pax7a-expressing cells initiate de novo fibre formation, while pax7b-expressing cells promote fibre growth [OA].

 

 

Linking neural crest cell migration to craniofacial disorders

Capture_PeraPera and co-workers use Xenopus to model Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, which is caused by mutations in dermatan sulfate enzymes. The craniofacial abnormalities associated with the disorder may arise from defective migration, rather than specification, of neural crest cells [OA].

 

 

 

 

Thumbs up (2 votes)
Loading...

Categories: Research

Novel optogenetic probe for in vivo optogenetic control

Posted by , on 28 June 2016

Optogenetics has been widely used in the study of neural activity and behavior. By using genetic tools to target light-sensitive proteins to one or populations of neurons in specific region of brain, we can active those neurons by optical stimulation.

The foundation of neuron interaction bases on the ion transmission through the neuron membrane. The positively charged ions and negatively charged ions flow across the membrane via the transmission proteins and the balance of these ions in both inside and outside of the neurons contribute to the neurons trigger action potential. The action potentials, as known as spikes, are the key points in neural communication. Therefore, if we control the transmission proteins by genetic methods, then we can control the transmission of ions flow, which means that we can control the neurons communication.

Recently, the conventional way to achieve optogenetics is introducing light via optical fibers. However, light delivered by optical fibers is not at high spatial resolution in the brain because of light absorption and scattering. Therefore, Robert et al., show a novel optogenetic probe that achieves cell-type-specific perturbation precisely at high spatial resolution. The probe presented in the paper integrates micro-LEDs so that the light source is brought into the deep brain which allows high-spatial stimulation. Also the dimension of probe is small enough to minimize insertion damage. Unlike other similar approaches, the micro-LEDs are fabricated on silicon substrate, not on sapphire substrate. Sapphire-based LEDs cannot be thinned beyond 100 mm but silicon substrate can be thinned to a proper size that suitable for the probe. Therefore, the probe is able to reach the deep region of brain without unnecessary damage. I think this novel probe offers a good opportunity to study the neuron communication.

Further reading:

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep28381

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags: ,
Categories: Highlights

A day in the cleanroom

Posted by , on 28 June 2016

Hello guys, I am a PhD student from University of Strathclyde, UK. My PhD career has two parts: microfabrication and neural recordings. With the help of novel semiconductor fabrication techniques, I can make micro-level devices for neuroscience applications such as neural recordings and optogenetics.

The whole fabrication process is done in the cleanroom which can block any tiny particles in the air and make all the fabrication steps are done in micro- or even nano-scale precisely. In order to keep the good fabrication environment of cleanroom, everyone who wants to enter into the cleanroom will be required to wear this specific suit.

 

 

It will cover your whole body from head to feet; even your eyes are protected by goggles. Thanks to my poor eyesight, I have to wear two glasses! (PS: It really reminds me the nightmare of watching IMAX 3D movie. Every time I go to cinema to watch IMAX 3D movie, the 3D glasses is always unsuitable to my own glasses! T_T)

Well, let’s go back to the story. The device I design for neural recording has multi-layer structure. So Mask Aligner can help me to transfer the designed patterns to the sample layer by layer. I also need to work on these benches to do some chemical works which I call “Magic”! Haha!

 

 

When the work is done here, some big guys are waiting for me in the white room. Neurons communicate with each other via electrical signals which are called Spikes and the amplitude of spikes is about microvolt. Therefore, metal with low resistance is required.

 

 

Yes! Gold! It is you! See the big guy there? His name is Sputter and he will deposit a uniform thin layer of gold on the sample. Then RIE (reactive ion etching) will draw a picture on the gold layer to form patterns that I want to have.

 

 

See! Great job!! Well done!!!

The device is used to record signals in vitro. The tissues will be cultured on the top of the array and the spikes will be recorded by these electrodes and transmitted to the outer electronic system. The fabrication work is a little bit tricky because it requires time to practise and optimize. Sometimes it is annoying to be honest but I have already drawn into it.

Good luck to my device! GOOOOOD luck to my PhD!

Thumbs up (2 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , ,
Categories: Careers, Lab Life

Post Doctoral Position in Cell and Developmental Biology

Posted by , on 27 June 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

Post doctoral position available to study the genetic and epigenetic control of stem cell attributes and pluripotency, focusing on the neural crest gene regulatory network (NC-GRN). Neural crest cells are stem cell-like progenitors that migrate extensively and whose genesis was central to the evolution of vertebrates. Misregulation of components of the NC-GRN underlies numerous human diseases and congenital disorders. Studies involve post-translational regulation of known network components, and use of proteomics and next generation sequencing to identify novel components. 

Highly motivated applicants with a PhD and strong background in cell and molecular biology and/or developmental biology are encourage to apply. Please send a CV, brief description of research interests, and the names of three references to:

Carole LaBonne, PhD (clabonne@northwestern.edu)
Department of Molecular Biosciences
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 602028

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

PhD position available at UCL from September 2016 to work on eye development in zebrafish

Posted by , on 27 June 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

The Fight for Sight charity have provided a three year studentship to Stephen Wilson and Gaia Gestri to support a student to work on the role of the Yap/Taz pathway in the morphogenesis of the eye. The project will use zebrafish as a model and will involve a combination of imaging and molecular genetic approaches to resolve the cell behaviours that regulate eye formation in health and disease.

 

We are looking for a talented, motivated and enthusiastic student to work in a team of scientists studying various aspects of brain and eye development (www.ucl.ac.uk/zebrafish-group/). Candidates will have suitable MSc and/or BSC qualifications and ideally experience and expertise in imaging and image analysis and in working with zebrafish as a model system.

 

Please send a CV and letter of interest to Gaia (g.gestri@ucl.ac.uk) and/or Steve (s.wilson@ucl.ac.uk) before the11th July.

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Tags:
Categories: Jobs

Postdoctoral Training Fellow in Human Embryology and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory

Posted by , on 27 June 2016

Closing Date: 15 March 2021

CONTEXT

 

We are seeking a highly motivated and collaborative postdoc in the area of human embryology and stem cell biology to join Dr. Kathy Niakan’s laboratory.

 

We have identified several transcription factors and components of key signaling pathways that are highly expressed in pluripotent epiblast cells of the developing human embryo. The pluripotent epiblast has the unique potential to give rise to the entire fetus in vivo and can self-renew indefinitely as embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in vitro. Understanding the molecular basis of lineage specification in the early human embryo is of fundamental biological importance and has significant clinical implications for infertility treatment as well as the use of hESCs to treat various diseases. Importantly, the genes we identified as enriched in human embryos are not expressed in mouse embryos at the equivalent developmental stage, further suggesting differences in pluripotency mechanisms between these species.

 

The aim of the project is to characterise putative regulators of human pluripotency and embryogenesis using currently the most efficient and precise genome editing technique (CRISPR/Cas9) in human embryos and stem cells. This will provide fundamental insights into human biology and facilitate the development of conditions for the establishment of novel human stem cells. We also seek to establish novel human embryonic stem cells by modulating signaling pathways that we have identified as specific enriched and functional in the development of the pluripotent human epiblast.

 

The successful candidate is likely to be an energetic, focused, and productive individual with a desire to work in a congenial, dynamic, and collaborative research environment. Good organisational, analytical, and communication skills are essential.

 

ORGANISATION

 

Dr Niakan’s laboratory focuses on understanding the mechanisms of lineage specification in human embryos and the derivation of novel human stem cells. Details of research projects currently being undertaken can be seen at:  http://www.crick.ac.uk/kathy-niakan

Research techniques used in the laboratory include: molecular biology, advanced microscopy and image quantification, human and mouse preimplantation embryo culture and micromanipulation, genome modification, genome-wide techniques including single-cell RNA-sequencing, human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell derivation.

 

OBJECTIVES

In this project, some of the specific objectives could include, but not be limited to:

  • Stem cell derivation from embryos
  • Reprogramming using induced pluripotent stem cell approaches
  • Genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9
  • Genomic profiling of early human embryos and microdissected cells
  • Ensuring the design and implementation of the project
  • Liaising with collaborators within the Crick, the UK and abroad
  • Writing and contributing to the preparation of scientific manuscripts, reports, presentations and records of experimental plans and results
  • Working closely with the Group Leader and other team members to report on the results via publications
  • Supervising and providing technical advice to more junior members of the team when appropriate

 

ABOUT US

 

The Francis Crick Institute has a distinctive vision of how biomedical research is conducted. It is one of the most significant projects in UK biomedical science for a generation. The institute’s labs have an international reputation for cutting edge research into basic biology and are committed to training the next generation of research scientists.

 

On 1 April 2015, staff from the London Research Institute (CRUK) and National Institute for Medical Research (MRC) transferred to the Crick to form a fully functional research institute on four sites. In 2016, the Crick will move to a single new, purpose built research centre in St. Pancras which will house some 1,500 staff.

 

PERSON SPECIFICATION

The post holder should embody and demonstrate our core Crick values: Bold, Imaginative, Open, Dynamic and Collegial, in addition to the following:

Essential

  • PhD in the areas of Developmental Biology, Stem Cells, Molecular Biology or similar (or in the final stages of PhD submission)
  • Good knowledge and experience in molecular biology and microscopy
  • Technical expertise in embryo and/or cell culture
  • Proven track record of research (i.e. publication record)
  • Excellent communication skills required – both oral and written presentation
  • Ability to communicate ideas and results effectively and interact fluidly with computational biologists
  • Ability to work independently and organise own workload
  • Ability to design experiments, report on research progress and outcomes openly and review methodologies in response to feedback
  • Highly motivated, organized and analytical
  • Ability to update knowledge in the specialist area and implement relevant technologies to advance the project

 

Desirable

  • Experience in preimplantation mouse or human embryo culture
  • Experience in human and mouse pluripotent stem cell culture
  • Experience in preparing samples for advanced sequencing
  • Experience in genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 technology
  • Experience in lentivirus production and transduction

 

Postdoctoral Training Fellows are expected to lead their own projects, contribute to other projects on a collaborative basis (both in the lab and with external collaborators) and guide PhD students in their research. The ability to work in a team is essential.

If you are interested in applying for this role please apply through our online system:

Jobs.crick.ac.uk 

Thumbs up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Categories: Jobs

Plant “Velcro” holds it all together

Posted by , on 27 June 2016

False colour SEM image of cotton trichomes from different overlapping petals act like Velcro to hold petals in place as they grow.
False colour SEM image of cotton trichomes from different overlapping petals that act like Velcro to hold petals in place as they grow.

 

Plant hairs or trichomes mean little to most people until they bite into a furry skinned peach or prick their finger on a rose bush thorn, but in the plant kingdom these versatile epidermal structures perform many essential functions that are attributable to their physical shape, location, density and sometimes chemical composition. Next time you pop on a cotton T-shirt think about where the fibres for that textile come from – it’s made from a plant trichome.

For the last 20 years or more our lab has been concerned with understanding the molecular basis for the differentiation of the long hairs or seed trichomes that develop on the seeds of the cotton plant, Gossypium hirsutum L.. These fibres can become very long, reaching up to 5 cm or more in some cotton species, so could be some of the longest cells in the plant kingdom. They are single cells of the cotton ovule epidermis that elongate and fill with a thick secondary cell wall layer that is almost pure cellulose which imparts the special feel and fabric properties of cotton textiles. Using cDNA microarrays we were able to compare the genome wide expression in cotton ovules just initiating the production of fibres and with the gene expression in ovules from a mutant plant that didn’t make any fibres (Wu et al., 2006). This identified members of two specialised classes of plant-specific transcription factors: MIXTA-like MYB genes and homeodomain-leucine zipper IV (HD-zip) genes that were reduced in expression in the fibreless mutant. These two families of genes appear to have evolved diverse functions in regulating epidermal cell differentiation in plants, including plant trichomes.

 

Cotton seed fibres
Cotton seed fibres are long single cells, tens of thousands of which grow on the surface of each seed within the cotton fruit or boll.

 

Detailed functional analysis of our three candidate genes in transgenic cotton plants using over-expression and gene silencing strategies indicated that the transcription factors MYB25, MYB25-like and HD-1 all played essential roles in cotton fibre development and MYB25 and HD-1 were also key components in the development of other hairs that covered the leaves and stems of the cotton plant (Machado et al., 2009, Walford et al., 2011 and 2012).   The sequencing of the cotton genome (Paterson et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2015) a few years ago (cotton is a polyploid species with two genomes A and D derived from the hybridisation of two ancestral Gossypium diploid species a couple of million years ago) enabled us to look more closely at a whole genome level at all the potential members of these specialised classes of genes. We have focussed mainly on understanding the MIXTA-MYBs.  Cotton has ten (including MYB25 and MYB25-like) of these types of genes (twenty if you count both sub-genomes) – seven more than the model plant species Arabidopsis, so there has been an expansion of this gene type in cotton presumably to cope with the large variety of epidermal cell types in cotton, including the seed fibres that are a special feature found in only some plant species!

Over the last few years we have been working our way through the cotton MIXTA-MYB family trying to define their functions using the same approach of characterising their tissue and developmental gene expression patterns and silencing and over-expressing them in transgenic cotton plants. All of them except perhaps MYBML10 (MYB MIXTA-Like gene 10) appeared to be expressed predominantly in cotton ovules during the stages of early fibre development (Bedon et al., 2014). Some of the other genes appear to be part of the regulatory cascade controlling fibre development and are downstream of MYB25-like, but they may also be shared components of development pathways for other types of trichomes. That is another story, but this blog is mainly about MYBML10 that was found to be the master regulator for a very special type of trichome present on the petals of the cotton flower. These trichomes have an interesting evolutionary function and their analysis formed the basis for our recent Letter to Nature Plants (Tan et al., 2016).

In a phylogeny of the cotton MIXTA-MYB protein sequences, MYBML10 clustered together with MYB25 and MYB25-like, so we expected it to be part of the fibre development pathway, however it was very lowly expressed in whole cotton ovules and in the outer integument layer of the ovule (a 3-4 cell layer that includes the epidermis layer where the fibres initiate and which we can painstakingly dissect away from the rest of the ovule for fine gene expression analysis (Bedon et al., 2013)). When we silenced this gene using RNAi there didn’t appear to be any effect on cotton fibre production, but the sharp eyes of postdoc, Jiafu Tan, noticed that the flower buds of the most silenced lines were abnormal and the seed set on those plants was reduced, mainly because the petals did not cover the anthers and stigma properly when they were very young and parts of these tissues dried out and died. He embarked on a detailed microscopic and molecular analysis to understand why this might be the case and in doing so stumbled on a new type of trichome in cotton that had a pretty important function of holding together the petals of the developing cotton bud to protect the immature reproductive tissues until they were ready to be exposed to the outside environment. Both the outside and inside faces of the cotton petals had trichomes with those on the outside being mostly four-celled stellate or star-shaped trichomes and those on the inside being single celled trichomes. When the petals are folded around each other, as they are in the young flower bud, the outer and inner faces overlap and the two types of trichomes become juxtaposed and entangled just like ‘Velcro’ to lock the petal edges together (false colour picture at top and black and white image below).

 

SEM picture of a cross-section of a small cotton flower bud (looking up towards the tip) showing how the petals are folded over one another and their trichomes entangled.
SEM picture of a cross-section of a small cotton flower bud (looking up towards the tip) showing how the petals are folded over one another and their trichomes entangled.

 

Silencing the transcription factor MYBML10 inhibited the development of the trichomes on both faces of the petal and this allowed the petals to slide past one another as they expanded inside the bud causing the bud to twist and expose the young anthers and stigma to the air. As these reproductive tissue were damaged and cotton is a self-pollinating plant, then few seeds were set, so these trichomes were a critical evolutionary development in cotton. By collaborating with a materials science engineer at a neighbouring university’s Engineering Department we were able to take a couple of these petals that were linked together by their trichomes and actuially measure the force needed to pull them apart in a specially designed tension meter – it was a wopping 1 N per petal edge, so these trichomes can withstand amazing forces that must be being generated within the flower bud as the petals expand inside. No wonder the flowers are twisted and abnormal when they don’t have petal trichomes.

Are these petal trichomes something unique to cotton? When we started looking, the answer was a resounding no. Visiting a local nursery (fortunately it was summer), we were able to find a selection of flowering plants to look at. Petal trichomes were by no means found in every flower we looked at, but they were certainly prevalent in the Malvaceae, the plant family that includes cotton and its Hibiscus relatives, but they were also present in a number of other plant families and it wasn’t just on the petals, but also the next outer layer of the flower, the sepals and even the next layer, the bracts.

 

SEM image of the top of the flower bud of Hibiscus syriacus showing interleaved trichomes from different sepals.
SEM image of the top of the flower bud of Hibiscus syriacus showing interleaved trichomes from different sepals that hold the bud together as it grows.

 

Petal trichomes have therefore been an important development during plant evolution, particularly in species, like those in the Malvaceae whose large flowers expand rapidly before the reproductive organs are fully adapted to drier environments. Trichomes have also been found in some other species like tomato to hold together separate anthers into  something like a salt shaker (anther cone) to allow the pollen to all be released at one time when an insect visits a flower (Glover et al., 2004) so trichomes are one form of Nature’s glue to effectively bind organs together to create the diversity of structures we appreciate as flowers, and while we didn’t find a new gene that we could manipulate to improve cotton fibre production we did unearth some fascinating biology that illustrates the simple beauty of Nature’s engineering.

 

References

Bedon F, Ziolkowski L, Osabe K, Venebles I, Machado A and Llewellyn D (2013) Separation of integument and nucellar tissues from cotton ovules (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for both high- and low-throughput molecular applications. BioTechniques   54, 44-46.

Bedon F, Ziolkowski L, Walford S-A, Dennis ES and Llewellyn DJ (2014) Members of the MYBMIXTA-like transcription factors may orchestrate the initiation of fibre development in cotton seeds. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, e179 doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00179

Glover BJ, Bunnewell S and Martin C (2004) Convergent evolution within the genus Solanum: the specialised anther cone develops through alternative pathways. Gene 331, 1-7.

Machado A, Wu Y, Yang Y, Llewellyn D and Dennis ES (2009). The MYB transcription factor GhMYB25 regulates early fibre and trichome development. The Plant Journal 59, 52-62.

Paterson AH, Wendel JF, Gundlach H, Guo H, Jenkins J, Jin D, Llewellyn D, Showmaker KC, Shu S, Udall J, Yoo M-J, Byers R, Chen W, Doron-Faigenboim A, Duke MV, Gong L, Grimwood J, Grover C, Grupp K, Hu G, Lee T-H, Li J, Lin L, Liu T, Marler BS, Page JT, Roberts AW, Romanel E, Sanders WS, Szadkowski E, Tan X, Tang H, Xu C, Wang J, Wang Z, Zhang D, Zhang L, Ashfari H, Bedon F, Bowers JE, Brubaker CL, Chee PW, Das S, Gingle AR, Haigler CH, Harker D, Hoffmann LV, Hovav R, Jones DC, Lemke C, Mansoor S, ur Rahman M, Rainville LN, Rambani A, Reddy UK, Rong J-K, Saranga Y, Scheffler BE, Scheffler JA, Stelly DM, Triplett BA, Van Deynze A, Vaslin MFS, Waghmare VN, Walford S-A, Wright RJ, Zaki EA, Zhang T, Dennis ES, Mayer KFX, Peterson DG, Rokhsar DS, Wang X and Schmutz J (2012) Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable fibers. Nature 492, 423–427.

Tan J, Walford S-A, Dennis ES and Llewellyn DJ (2016) Trichomes control flower bud shape by linking young petals together. Nature Plants 2, Article number: 16093. Published online June 20 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.93

Walford SA, Wu YR, Llewellyn DJ and Dennis ES (2012) Epidermal cell differentiation in cotton mediated by the homeodomain leucine zipper gene, GhHD-1. Plant Journal 71, 464-478.

Walford S, Wu Y, Llewellyn DJ and Dennis ES (2011) GhMYB25-like: a key factor in early cotton fibre development. The Plant Journal 5, 785-797.

Wu Y, Machado A, White RG, Llewellyn DJ and Dennis ES (2006). Expression profiling identifies genes expressed during early lint fibre initiation in cotton. Plant and Cell Physiology 47, 107-127.

Zhang T, Hu Y, Jiang W, Fang L, Guan X, Chen J, Zhang J, Saski C, Scheffler BE, Stelly DM, Hulse-Kemp AM, Wan Q, Liu B, Liu C, Wang S, Pan M, Wang Y, Wang D, Ye W, Chang L, Zhang W, Song Q, Kirkbride R, Chen X, Dennis E, Llewellyn DJ, Peterson DG, Thaxton P, Jones DC, Wang Q, Xu X, Zhang H, Wu H, Zhou L, Mei G, Chen S, Tian Y, Xiang D, Li X, Ding J, Zuo Q, Tao L, Liu Y, Li J, Lin Y, Hui Y, Cao Z, Cai C, Zhu X, Jiang Z, Zhou B, Guo W, Li R, and Chen ZJ (2015). Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fibre improvement. Nature Biotechnology 33, 531–537 doi:10.1038/nbt.3207

Thumbs up (6 votes)
Loading...

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Research